Field-Scale Modelling of Hybrid Steam and Combustion In-Situ Recovery Process for Oil Sands using Dynamic Gridding
- Min Yang (University of Calgary) | Thomas G. Harding (Nexen Energy ULC) | Zhangxin Chen (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, 13-14 March, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 5.8 Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs, 5.2.2 Fluid Modeling, Equations of State, 5.2 Fluid Characterization, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation
- Hybrid Steam and Combustion, Dynamic Gridding, Thermal Recovery, Field-Scale Modelling, Oil Sands
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 167 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Hybrid steam and in-situ combustion recovery processes have shown advantages over pure steam injection for recovery of oil sands resources, particularly with respect to reducing costs and lowering requirement for water and natural gas. However, it has been very challenging to predict field performance of hybrid steam and combustion processes with a reasonable degree of confidence. Usually, a combustion front has a thickness of only a few inches and high resolution grids are required to capture the steep temperature, saturation and fluid composition gradients in the vicinity of the combustion front. Using high resolution, fine grids to improve accuracy of simulation requires excessive computation time and, therefore, may be impractical for field scale modelling. It is important to have a robust simulation tool to accurately predict reservoir performance without compromising the computational efficiency.
In this work, numerical modeling of a hybrid steam and combustion recovery process was performed in a typical Athabasca oil sands reservoir. A comprehensive new reaction kinetics model derived from laboratory results was incorporated to represent the complex chemical reactions in the combustion process. The hybrid recovery process utilized oxygen enriched air co-injection after several years of SAGD operation. In the numerical model, safe limits were set on producing well temperature and oxygen content of produced fluids. The initial grid size in the numerical model was at the centimeter scale resulting in large run time, and thus, in order to improve the computational efficiency, a dynamic gridding feature was applied. Parameters for controlling the creation of a dynamic grid and subsequently reverting back to the coarse grid have been examined in order to properly trigger the dynamic gridding feature in the model. Once the optimized dynamic gridding parameters were determined, several different well configurations were investigated. Comparisons were made between SAGD and hybrid steam/combustion processes in terms of cumulative water (steam) injection, cumulative oil production, and a steam-oil ratio.
By comparing the simulation results from the fine grid model and the dynamic gridding model, it has been found that the temperature gradient is the best criterion to use for controlling dynamic gridding compared to fluid saturation and/or composition criteria. The threshold value for the temperature criterion was determined to be 35°C. The model locates the fine grids in close proximity to the combustion front where the temperature and fluid saturation gradients are the steepest and it places the coarse grid blocks elsewhere in the model. Comparisons are made between the computation time and the accuracy of the simulation and these demonstrate that dynamic grid amalgamation reduces the computation time significantly while maintaining reasonable computation accuracy of simulation. Compared with SAGD, the hybrid steam/in-situ combustion process reduced cumulative water usage (steam injection) by 20% to 27%, while the cumulative oil production remained the same.
This paper provides a workflow for modelling of hybrid steam and combustion processes. Also, it is expected that this work will provide insights for field design of these hybrid thermal recovery processes.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||19|
Belgrave, J.D.M., Nzekwu, B., and Chhina, H.S. SAGD Optimization with Air Injection. Paper SPE 106901, presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Argentina, April 15-18, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2118/106901-MS.
Card, C.C.H., Kumar, A., Close, J.C., Kjosavik, A., Agustsson, H., and Picone, M.M.P. 2014. A New and Practical Workflow for Large Multipad SAGD Simulation - An Oil-Sands Case Study. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 53(1), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.2118/165511-PA.
Chen, X., Chen, Z., Moore, R.G., Mehta, S.A., Ursenbach, M.G., and Harding, T.G. 2014. Kinetic Modeling of the In Situ Combustion Process for Athabasca Oil Sands. Presented at the SPE Heavy Oil Conference, Calgary, 10-12 June. SPE-170150-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/170150-MS.
Christensen, J.R., Darche, G., Dechelette, B., Ma, H., and Sammon, P.H. 2004. Application of Dynamic Gridding to Thermal Simulations. Paper SPE 86969, presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium and Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, CA, March 16-18. https://doi.org/10.2118/86969-MS.
Freitag, N.P., and Exelby, D.R. 1998. Heavy Oil Production by In Situ Combustion - Distinguishing the Effects of the Steam and Fire Fronts. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 37(4), 25-32. PETSOC-98-04-02. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/98-04-02.
Hoteit, H., and Chawathe, A. 2016. Making Field-Scale Chemical Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Simulations a Practical Reality with Dynamic Gridding. SPE Journal, 21(6), 2220-2237. https://doi.org/10.2118/169688-PA.
Hogue, B., Gutierrez, D., Hong, C., Steiner, J., and Freeman, L. 2015. Oil Recovery from Gas Over Bitumen (GOB) Reservoirs - Results from the AIDROH Pilot Project in Alberta. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 54(6), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.2118/174455-PA.
Ivory, J., Rocco, M., and Paradis, N. 1992. Investigation of the Mechanisms Involved in the Steam-Air Injection Process. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 31(2), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.2118/92-02-04.
Oskouei, J.P., Moore, R.G., Maini, B.B., and Mehta, S.A. 2011. Feasibility of In-Situ Combustion in the SAGD Chamber. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 50(4), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.2118/137832-PA.
Jonasson, H.P., and Kerr, R.K. 2013. SAGDOX - Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage With the Addition of Oxygen Injection. Paper SPE 165509, presented at the SPE Heavy Oil Conference, Alberta, Canada, June 11-13. https://doi.org/10.2118/165509-MS.
Ma, M., Rabiei, M., Hassanzadeh, H., Harding, T.G., and Zanon, S. 2017. Comparative Study of SAGD and Solvent and Water Assisted Electrical Heating: Effect of Shale Layers. Paper SPE-184994-MS, presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Canada, February 15-16. https://doi.org/10.2118/184997-MS.
Mercado, D. and Trevisan, O.V. 2017. Pseudokinetic Model for Field-Scale Simulation of In-Situ Combustion. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 20(1), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.2118/181760-PA.
Moore, R.G., Belgrave, J.D.M., Ursenbach, M.G., Laureshen, C.J., Mehta, S.A., and Gomez, P.A. 1999. In Situ Combustion Performance in Steam Flooded Heavy Oil Cores. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 38(13), 1-9. PETSOC-99-13-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/99-13-34.
Perez-perez, A., Mujica, M., and Bogdanov, I. 2016. A Methodological Analysis of the Mechanisms Associated with Steam/Oxygen Co-injection Processes using Dynamic Gridding. SPE Journal, 21(6), 2238-2249. https://doi.org/10.2118/169075-PA.
Rabiei, M., Hassanzadeh, H., and Harding, T.G. 2016. Numerical Simulation of Bitumen Recovery Using Solvent and Water Assisted Electrical Heating. Fuel, 186, 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.08.077.
Sammon, P.H. 2003. Dynamic Grid Refinement and Amalgamation for Compositional Simulation. Paper SPE 79683, presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, TX, February 3-5. https://doi.org/10.2118/79683-MS.
Van Batenburg, D.W., Bosch, M., Boerrigter, P.M., and Vink, J.C. 2011. Application of Dynamic Gridding Techniques to IOR/EOR-Processes. Paper SPE 141711, presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Woodlands, TX, February 21-23. https://doi.org/10.2118/141711-MS.
Yang, M., Harding, T.G., and Chen, Z. 2017a. An Improved Kinetics Model for In Situ Combustion of Pre-Steamed Oil Sands. Energy & Fuels, 31(4), 3546-3556. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02582.
Yang, M., Harding, T.G., Chen, Z., Yu, K., Liu, H., Yang, B., and He, R. 2017b. Numerical Modelling of Hybrid Steam and In-Situ Combustion Performance for Oil Sands. Paper SPE-182708-MS, presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference, Montgomery, TX, February 20-22. https://doi.org/10.2118/182708-MS.