Analysis and Optimization of Bubbly Oil Production in Heavy Oil Reservoirs
- Cenk Temizel (Aera Energy) | Raul Moreno (University of Kansas) | Bao Jia (University of Kansas) | Ahmad Alkouh (Middle East Oilfield Services) | Basel Al-Otaibi (Kuwait Oil Company) | Mohammad Kyanpour (RGL Reservoir Management Inc.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Kuwait Oil & Gas Show and Conference, 15-18 October , Kuwait City, Kuwait
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2017. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.2 Fluid Characterization, 4.6 Natural Gas, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 5.5.5 Evaluation of uncertainties, 5.7 Reserves Evaluation, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 4.6 Natural Gas
- heavy oil, optimization, foamy oil
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 89 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Some heavy oils reservoirs present an unusual behavior when put on production under significant drawdown conditions. In these reservoirs, the high formation depressurization increments the recovery factor and accelerates the production rates driven by a solution gas mechanism. Due to the chemical and physical properties of these oils they tend to stabilize the dispersion of gas bubbles, promoting the generation of foam in the oleic phase. This foamy oil when compared with conventional oils result in a more productive response at similar drawdown conditions. The foamy oil phase behavior is the result of a number of complex mechanisms and requires a good understanding on each of them to estimate the potential response of these reservoirs. In this work, the role of key factors that affect the bubbly oil production is summarized.
To outline the significance of key variables on the performance, a commercial optimization and uncertainty analysis software coupled with a mechanistic simulator is used. The simulator allows a detailed modeling of the physics involved on the generation and behavior of the foamy oils, in which the foamy oil is modeled as a disperse phase of gas bubbles in the oleic phase, including small mobile gas bubbles and larger trapped gas bubbles flowing as discontinuous gas dispersion which affect foam viscosity, compressibility, mobility and relative permeability. Fluid properties used in this work are from Maini (1996).
The sensitivity and optimization analysis performed in this work on key reservoir variables and well operational parameters shows the significance of each factor on the production response. The relative importance of each variable is reported in tornado diagrams. Results showed that a strong approach on handling the reservoir unknowns are as crucial as the control of operational parameters from reservoir management point of view.
Nowadays the foamy oil behavior and its favorable production response are not totally well understood. Solutions have been proposed but they are still controversial and the use of horizontal wells introduces more complexity in the production operations. In this work is provided an in-depth optimization and uncertainty analysis to outline the role of each major parameter affecting the production response and the recovery efficiency in this type of reservoirs using horizontal wells.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||32|
Chopra, S.Lines, L.Schmitt, D.. 2010. Heavy Oils: Reservoir Characterization and Production Monitoring, Society of Exploration Geophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802235.
Li, S.Li, Z.Lu, T.. 2012. Experimental Study on Foamy Oil Flow in Porous Media with Orinoco Belt Heavy Oil. Energy & Fuels 26 (10): 6332–6342. http://doi.org/10.1021/ef301268u.
Maini, B. 1996. Foamy Oil Flow In Heavy Oil Prodution. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 35 (06): 21–24. http://doi.org/10.2118/96-06-01.
Maini, B. B. 1999. Foamy Oil Flow in Primary Production of Heavy Oil under Solution Gas Drive. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 3-6 October. SPE-56541-MS. http://doi.org/10.2118/56541-MS.
Moe Soe Let, K. P., Manichand, R. N., and Seright, R. S. 2012. Polymer Flooding a ~500-cp Oil. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 14-18 April. SPE-154567-MS. http://doi.org/10.2118/154567-MS.
Sheng, J. J. 1999. Critical Review of Foamy Oil Flow. Transport in Porous Media 35 (2): 157–187. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006575510872.
Tatham, R. 1982. Vp/Vs and lithology. Geophysics 47 (3): 336–344. http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441339.
Tatham, R. and Stoffa, P. 1976. Vp/Vs—A Potential Hydrocarbon Indicator. Geophysics 41 (5): 837–849. http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440668.
Yuan, J. Y., Babchin, A., and Tremblay, B. 2000. Modelling Wormhole Flow in Cold Production. 39 (04): 40–44. http://doi.org/10.2118/00-04-02.