Integration of Core Analysis, Pumping Schedule and Microseismicity to Reduce Uncertainties of Production Performance of Complex Fracture Networks for Multi-Stage Hydraulically Fractured Reservoirs
- Geng Niu (Texas A&M University) | Jianlei Sun (Texas A&M University) | Sergei Parsegov (Texas A&M University) | David Schechter (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, 4-6 October , Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2017. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.6.6 Directional Drilling, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 5.6 Formation Evaluation & Management, 5.6.2 Core Analysis, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 2 Well completion, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.5.8 History Matching, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 3 Production and Well Operations
- Stochastic Discrete Fracture Networks, Pumping Schedule, Fracture Characterization, Microseismic, History Match
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 181 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
Microseismicity is a physical phenomenon which allows us to estimate the production capability of the well after hydraulic fracturing (HF) in a naturally fractured (NF) reservoir. Some of the microseismic events are reactivations of NFs induced by a direct hit of HF, while others are induced by the fluid leak-off from the previous stages or by elastic waves emitted into the reservoir with hydraulic fracture plane propagation. The former NFs have a chance to be propped there as the latter will not significantly increase their contribution to the production. Identification of such microseismic events helps to reduce uncertainty in the description of fracture network geometry.
Based on inferred data from core analysis NF densities and orientations, we generated multiple realizations of the semi-stochastic Discrete Fracture Network (DFN). In order to constrain them, we used time evolution of microseismic cloud in addition to results of core analysis. Fluid and proppant pumping schedule is used to identify such microseismic events because they should be located close to the pressure diffusion front generated by hydraulic fluid. Events outside of proposed region may be triggered by other factors, such as stress-strain relaxation from other stages and correspondent fractures. In most cases, they are not wide enough to take proppant from the main HF. This approach was used to reduce range of production for DFN realizations.
This workflow is implanted to a 15-stage hydraulic fracture treatment on a horizontal well placed in a siltstone reservoir with intrinsic fractures. The spatio-temporal dynamics of microseismic events are classified into two groups by the front of nonlinear pressure diffusion caused by 3-dimensional hydraulic fracturing, considered as effective and ineffective events. DFNs with only effective microseismicity and with all the induced events are generated. Then, two types of DFN related uncertainties on production are performed to evaluate the impact of filtration. Results of aleatory uncertainty quantification caused by the randomness of DFN modeling indicate the filtered events can generate a production DFN with a more consistent connected fracture area. Moreover, sensitivity analysis caused by lack of accuracy in natural fracture characterization shows the production area of DFN with filtration process is more insensitive to the variation of fracture parameters. Finally, a history match with production data and pressure data indicates this DFN model properly represents the reservoir and completion.
Our methodology characterizes well the conductive fracture network utilizing core data, microseismic data, and pumping schedule. It could restore the true productivity of each fractured stage from a massive microseismic cloud, which helps understand the contribution of fracturing job right after the treatment.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||20|
Albright, J.N. and Pearson, C.F. 1982. Acoustic Emissions as a Tool for Hydraulic Fracture Location: Experience at the Fenton Hill Hot Dry Rock Site. SPE Journal 22 (04): 523&-530. SPE 9509. http://doi.org/10.2118/9509-PA.
Barba, R.E., Jr. and Cutia, A.S. 1992. Evaluating Horizontal Well Potential in the Spraberry Trend. Presented at the Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, 18-20 March, Midland, Texas. http://doi.org/10.2118/23949-MS.
Batchelor, A.S., Baria, R., and Hearn, K. 1983. Monitoring the Effects of Hydraulic Stimulation by Microseismic Event Location: A Case Study. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 5-8 October, San Francisco, California. http://doi.org/10.2118/12109-MS.
Beggs, D.H. and Brill, J.P. 1973. A Study of Two-Phase Flow in Inclined Pipes. Journal of Petroleum Technology 25 (05): 607&-617. SPE 4007. http://doi.org/10.2118/4007-PA.
Blyton, C.a.J., Gala, D.P., and Sharma, M.M. 2015. A Comprehensive Study of Proppant Transport in a Hydraulic Fracture. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 28-30 September, Houston, Texas, USA. http://doi.org/10.2118/174973-MS.
Chierici, G.L., Ciucci, G.M., and Sclocchi, G. 1974. Two-Phase Vertical Flow in Oil Wells - Prediction of Pressure Drop. Journal of Petroleum Technology 26 (08): 927&-938. SPE 4316. http://doi.org/10.2118/4316-PA.
Cui, J., Yang, C., Zhu, D.. 2016a. Fracture Diagnosis in Multiple-Stage-Stimulated Horizontal Well by Temperature Measurements with Fast Marching Method. SPE Journal 21 (06): 2289&-2300. SPE 174880. http://doi.org/10.2118/174880-PA.
Cui, J. and Zhu, D. 2014. Diagnosis of Multiple Fracture Stimulation in Horizontal Wells by Downhole Temperature Measurements. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, 19-22 January, Doha, Qatar. http://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-17700-MS.
Cui, J., Zhu, D., and Jin, M. 2016b. Diagnosis of Production Performance after Multistage Fracture Stimulation in Horizontal Wells by Downhole Temperature Measurements. SPE Production & Operations 31 (04): 280&-288. SPE 170874. http://doi.org/10.2118/170874-PA.
Deghmoum, A.H., Tiab, D., and Mazouzi, A. 2001. Relative Permeability in Dual Porosity Porous Media. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 40 (12): 32&-42. PETSOC-01-12-01. http://doi.org/10.2118/01-12-01.
Dyes, A.B. and Johnston, O.C. 1953. Spraberry Permeability from Build-up Curve Analyses. Journal of Petroleum Technology 5 (05). SPE 228. http://doi.org/10.2118/228-G.
Gamboa, E.S., Sun, J., and Schechter, D. 2016. Reducing Uncertainties of Fracture Characterization on Production Performance by Incorporating Microseismic and Core Analysis Data. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Hydraulic Fracturing Conference held in Beijing, China, 24-26 August 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/181785-MS.
Garcia-Teijeiro, X. and Rodriguez-Herrera, A. 2014. Dependence of Stress-Induced Micro-Seismicity on Natural Fracture Properties and in-Situ Stress. Presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference - Canada, 30 September-2 October, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. http://doi.org/10.2118/171632-MS.
Heinemann, Z.E., Brand, C.W., Munka, M.. 1991. Modeling Reservoir Geometry with Irregular Grids. SPE Reservoir Engineering 6 (02): 225&-232. SPE 18412. http://doi.org/10.2118/18412-PA.
Hui, M.-H., Glass, J., Harris, D.. 2013. Discrete Natural Fracture Uncertainty Modelling for Produced Water Mitigation: Chuandongbei Gas Project, Sichuan, China. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, 26-28 March, Beijing, China. http://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-16814-MS.
Janssen, H. 2013. Monte-Carlo Based Uncertainty Analysis: Sampling Efficiency and Sampling Convergence. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 109: 123&-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.08.003.
Kou, R. and Akkutlu, Y. 2016. A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Approach in Estimating Organic-Rich Shale Permeability. Presented at the International Conference and Exhibition 3-6 April 2016, Barcelona, Spain 335&-335. http://doi.org/10.1190/ice2016-6479003.1.
Kou, R., Alafnan, S.F.K., and Akkutlu, I.Y. 2016. Coupling of Darcy's Equation with Molecular Transport and Its Application to Upscaling Kerogen Permeability. Presented at the SPE Europec featured at 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, 30 May-2 June, Vienna, Austria. http://doi.org/10.2118/180112-MS.
Kou, R., Alafnan, S.F.K., and Akkutlu, I.Y. 2017. Multi-Scale Analysis of Gas Transport Mechanisms in Kerogen. Transport in Porous Media 116 (2): 493&-519. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-016-0787-7.
Luo, S., Lutkenhaus, J.L., and Nasrabadi, H. 2016. Use of Differential Scanning Calorimetry to Study Phase Behavior of Hydrocarbon Mixtures in Nano-Scale Porous Media. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.12.019.
Mccain, W.D., Jr. 1991. Reservoir-Fluid Property Correlations-State of the Art (Includes Associated Papers 23583 and 23594). SPE Reservoir Engineering 6 (02): 266&-272. SPE 18571. http://doi.org/10.2118/18571-PA.
Mcdaniel, R.R., Holmes, D.V., Borges, J.. 2009. Determining Propped Fracture Width from a New Tracer Technology. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 19-21 January, The Woodlands, Texas. http://doi.org/10.2118/119545-MS.
Nagel, N.B., Garcia, X., Sanchez, M.A.. 2012. Understanding "SRV": A Numerical Investigation of "Wet" Vs. "Dry" Microseismicity During Hydraulic Fracturing. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 8-10 October, San Antonio, Texas, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/159791-MS.
Nordgren, R.P. 1972. Propagation of a Vertical Hydraulic Fracture. SPE Journal 12 (04): 306&-614. SPE 3009. http://doi.org/10.2118/3009-PA.
Perkins, T.K. and Kern, L.R. 1961. Widths of Hydraulic Fractures. Journal of Petroleum Technology 13 (09): 937&-949. SPE 89. http://doi.org/10.2118/89-PA.
Putra, E. and Schechter, D.S. 1999. Reservoir Simulation of Waterflood Pilot in Naturally Fractured Spraberry Trend. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/54336-MS.
Rogers, S., Elmo, D., Dunphy, R.. 2010. Understanding Hydraulic Fracture Geometry and Interactions in the Horn River Basin through DFN and Numerical Modeling. Presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, 19-21 October, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. http://doi.org/10.2118/137488-MS.
Rutledge, J. and Phillips, W. 2003. Hydraulic Stimulation of Natural Fractures as Revealed by Induced Microearthquakes, Carthage Cotton Valley Gas Field, East Texas. GEOPHYSICS 68 (2): 441&-452. http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1567214.
Shapiro, S.A., Dinske, C., and Berlin Freie, U. 2009. Fluid-Induced Seismicity: Pressure Diffusion and Hydraulic Fracturing. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING 57 (2): 301&-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00770.x.
Sharma, M.M. and Manchanda, R. 2015. The Role of Induced Un-Propped (IU) Fractures in Unconventional Oil and Gas Wells. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 28-30 September, Houston, Texas, USA. http://doi.org/10.2118/174946-MS.
Sun, J., Niu, G., and Schechter, D. 2016a. Numerical Simulation of Stochastically-Generated Complex Fracture Networks by Utilizing Core and Microseismic Data for Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells in Unconventional Reservoirs- a Field Case Study. Presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, 13-15 September, Canton, Ohio, USA. http://doi.org/10.2118/184077-MS.
Sun, J. and Schechter, D. 2015. Optimization-Based Unstructured Meshing Algorithms for Simulation of Hydraulically and Naturally Fractured Reservoirs with Variable Distribution of Fracture Aperture, Spacing, Length, and Strike. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 18 (04): 463&-480. SPE 170703. http://doi.org/10.2118/170703-PA.
Sun, J., Schechter, D., and Huang, C.-K. 2015. Sensitivity Analysis of Unstructured Meshing Parameters on Production Forecast of Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells. Presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, 9-12 November, Abu Dhabi, UAE. http://doi.org/10.2118/177480-MS.
Sun, J., Schechter, D., and Huang, C.-K. 2016b. Grid-Sensitivity Analysis and Comparison between Unstructured Perpendicular Bisector and Structured Tartan/Local-Grid-Refinement Grids for Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells in Eagle Ford Formation with Complicated Natural Fractures. SPE Journal 21 (06): 2260&-2275. SPE 177480. http://doi.org/10.2118/177480-PA.
Warpinski, N.R., Wolhart, S.L., and Wright, C.A. 2004. Analysis and Prediction of Microseismicity Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing. SPE Journal 9 (01): 24&-33. SPE 87673. http://doi.org/10.2118/87673-PA.
Wheaton, B., Haustveit, K., Deeg, W.. 2016. A Case Study of Completion Effectiveness in the Eagle Ford Shale Using Das/Dts Observations and Hydraulic Fracture Modeling. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 9-11 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. http://doi.org/10.2118/179149-MS.
Wilson, T. and Sullivan, P. 2016. Microseismic Energy Density and Event Trend Constraints on Model DFN Development for Hydraulically Fractured Reservoirs: Marcellus Shale, Southwestern Pennsylvania, USA. Presented at the 2016 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, 16-21 October, Dallas, Texas.
Wu, C.-H., Yi, S., and Sharma, M.M. 2017. Proppant Distribution among Multiple Perforation Clusters in a Horizontal Wellbore. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 24-26 January, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. http://doi.org/10.2118/184861-MS.
Wu, W., Kakkar, P., Zhou, J.. 2017. An Experimental Investigation of the Conductivity of Unpropped Fractures in Shales. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 24-26 January, The Woodlands, Texas, USA. http://doi.org/10.2118/184858-MS.