Inversion of Downhole Temperature Measurements in Multistage Fracture Stimulation in Horizontal Wells
- Shuang Zhang (Texas A&M University) | Ding Zhu (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 9-11 October, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2017. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 2.5.4 Multistage Fracturing, 2 Well completion, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 5.8 Unconventional and Complex Reservoirs
- downhole temperature measurement, fracture diagnosis
- 15 in the last 30 days
- 197 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
Today there are still many challenges in the quantitative interpretation of downhole distributed temperature measurements to diagnose multistage fracture treatments in horizontal wells. These challenges include handling enormous amount of data measured by the sensors continuously in time and space domain, a readily-to-be-used fast but robust forward model to simulate temperature behavior, and an efficient algorithm to inverse the parameters that are of interest. Because multistage fracturing involves many uncertain parameters; ranging from reservoir properties to treatment design, to fracture geometries and conductivity; the problem is extremely complex when inverse the measured temperature to a downhole flow profile. This study presents an approach to combine forward and inversion models to interpret downhole temperature data. The goal is to improve computational efficiency. Examples use the field data from a gas well in Marcellus shale formation to illustrate the feasibility of quantitative interpretation of temperature measurement for fracture diagnosis.
The forward model uses the fast marching method. The forward simulation is order-of-magnitude faster than even the semi-analytical model, which is the essential contribution to apply the method in the field case successfully. The inversion procedure starts with a sensitivity study to select the inversion parameters among various parameters such as fracture half-length, fracture conductivity, and determine the impact of their uncertainty on inversion. The inversion model uses the initial analysis on temperature gradient to identify the zones with significant temperature changes for interpretation and eliminates the rest of the data from interpretation. Thus, we obtain a prior estimation of the selected inversion parameters, which will be used as an initial guess of the inversion process. This prior estimation saves significant computation. The inversion is performed fracture by fracture either using parallel computing or sequential computing based on the sensor locations.
We first show a synthetic example with multiple fractures to illustrate the approach, test the procedure accuracy and computation speed. The primary inversion parameter is flow rate, and either fracture length or fracture conductivity, with all other parameters as an additional constraint. With an adequate initial guess, the inverted parameters match the reference "true value" properly. The inversion process converges with limited iterations for each fracture. The operation time highlights the advantages of the inversion model. The guided initial guess ensures the gradient inversion method converge and avoid local minimization. Finally, a field application is performed using this inversion model and shows encouraging results.
The results of the paper illustrate the feasibility and procedure of using temperature date to diagnose multistage fracture treatment. The proposed inversion model is fast and reliable which provides a promising tool that can be used to interpret downhole temperature data quantitatively.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||19|
Anifowoshe, O., Yates, M., Xu, L.. 2016. Improving Wellbore Stimulation Coverage in the Marcellus: Integrating Lateral Measurements with Enhanced Engineered Completion Design and Fiber Optic Evaluation. SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Canton, Ohio, 13-15 September. SPE-184051-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/184051-MS.
Cui, J., Yang, C., Zhu, D.. 2016. Fracture Diagnosis in Multiple-Stage-Stimulated Horizontal Well by Temperature Measurements With Fast Marching Method. SPE J. 21 (6): 2289- 2300. SPE-174880- PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/174880-PA.
Cui, J., Zhu, D., and Jin, M. 2016. Diagnosis of Production Performance after Multistage Fracture Stimulation in Horizontal Wells by Downhole Temperature Measurements. SPE Prod & Oper 31(04): 280–288. SPE-170874-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/170874-PA.
Duru, O.O., and Horne, R.N. 2010. Modeling Reservoir Temperature Transients and Reservoir-Parameter Estimation Constrained to the Model. SPE Res Eval & Eng 13(6): 873–883. SPE-115791-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/115791-PA.
Fujita, Y., Datta-Gupta, A., and King, M.J. 2016. A Comprehensive Reservoir Simulator for Unconventional Reservoirs That Is Based on the Fast Marching Method and Diffusive Time of Flight. SPE J 21 (06): 2276–2288. SPE-173269-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/173269-PA.
Hasan, A. R., Kabir, C. S., and Wang, X. 1997. Development and Application of a Wellbore/Reservoir Simulator for Testing Oil Wells. SPE Form Eval 12 (03): 182–188. SPE-29892-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/29892-PA.
Huckabee, P. T. 2009. Optic Fiber Distributed Temperature for Fracture Stimulation Diagnostics and Well Performance Evaluation. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 19-21 January. SPE-118831-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/118831-MS.
Kulkarni, K.N., Datta-Gupta, A., and Vasco, D.W. 2000. A Streamline Approach for Integrating Transient Pressure Data into High Resolution Reservoir Models. SPE European Petroleum Conference, Paris, France24-25 October. SPE-65120-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/65120-MS.
Li, Z., and Zhu, D. 2010. Predicting Flow Profile of Horizontal Well by Downhole Pressure and Distributed-Temperature Data for Waterdrive Reservoir. SPE Prod & Oper 25 (3): 296–304. SPE- 124873-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/124873-PA.
Ma, X., Al-Harbi, M., Datta-Gupta, A.. 2008. An Efficient Two-Stage Sampling Method for Uncertainty Quantification in History Matching Geological Models. SPE J 13 (1): 77–87. SPE-102476- PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/102476-PA.
Ramey, H. J. 1962. Wellbore Heat Transmission. SPE J 14(4): 427–435. SPE-96-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/96-PA.
Rassenfoss, S., and Jacobs, T. 2016. Unconventional Measures for Shale Reservoirs. J Pet Technol 68 (05): 31–38. SPE-0516-0030-JPT. https://doi.org/10.2118/0516-0030-JPT.
Ribeiro, P. M., and Horne, R. N. 2016. Detecting Fracture Growth Out of Zone by Use of Temperature Analysis. SPE J21(04): 1263 - 1278. SPE-170746-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/170746-PA.
Sierra, J. R., Kaura, J. D., Gualtieri, D.. 2008. DTS Monitoring of Hydraulic Fracturing: Experiences and Lessons Learned. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 21-24 September. SPE-116182-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/116182-MS.
Sui, W., Zhu, D., Hill, A. D.. 2008. Model for Transient Temperature and Pressure Behavior in Commingled Vertical Wells. SPE Russian Oil and Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, Russia, 28-30 October. SPE-115200-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/115200-MS.
Tang, H., Killough, J.E., Heidari, Z.. 2016. A New Technique to Characterize Fracture Density Using Neutron Porosity Logs Enhanced by Electrically-Transported Contrast Agents. SPE J. SPE-181509- PA (in press). https://doi.org/10.2118/181509-PA.
Wheaton, B., Haustveit, K., Deeg, W.. 2016. A Case Study of Completion Effectiveness in the Eagle Ford Shale Using DAS/DTS Observations and Hydraulic Fracture Modeling. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 9-11 February. SPE-179149-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179149-MS.
Ugueto, G. A., Huckabee, P. T., and Molenaar, M. M. 2015. Challenging Assumptions About Fracture Stimulation Placement Effectiveness Using Fiber Optic Distributed Sensing Diagnostics: Diversion, Stage Isolation and Overflushing. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 3-5 February. SPE-173348-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/173348-MS.
Ugueto C., G. A., Huckabee, P. T., Molenaar, M. M.. 2016. Perforation Cluster Efficiency of Cemented Plug and Perf Limited Entry Completions; Insights from Fiber Optics Diagnostics. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 9-11 February. SPE-179124- MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179124-MS.
Vasco, D.W., Keers, H., and Karasaki, K. 2000. Estimation of Reservoir Properties Using Transient Pressure Data: An Asymptotic Approach. Water Resources Research 36 (12): 3447–3465. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900179.
Xue, X., Yang, C., Sharma, V.K.. 2016. Reservoir and Fracture Flow Characterization Using a Novel W(x) Formulation. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1-3 August.URTEC-2440083-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2016-2440083.
Yang, C., Xue, X., Huang, J.. 2016. Rapid Refracturing Candidate Selection in Shale Reservoirs Using Drainage Volume and Instantaneous Recovery Ratio. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1-3 August. URTEC-2459368-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2016-2459368.
Yoshida, N., and Hill, A. D. 2016. Comprehensive Modeling of Downhole Temperature in a Horizontal Well with Multiple Fractures. SPE Asia Pacific Hydraulic Fracturing Conference, Beijing, China, 24-26 August. SPE-181812-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/181812-MS.
Yoshioka, K., Zhu, D., Hill, A. D.. 2007. Prediction of Temperature Changes Caused by Water or Gas Entry into a Horizontal Well. SPE Prod & Oper 22 (4): 425–433. SPE-100209-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/100209-PA.