Customizing Polymer Rheology for Application in Commercial Scale Polymer Floods
- R. Fortenberry (Ultimate EOR Services) | R. Hernandez (Ultimate EOR Services) | Z. Li (Ultimate EOR Services) | M. Delshad (Ultimate EOR Services)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 9-11 October, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2017. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3.6 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.4.10 Microbial Methods, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics
- Polymer, Sweep, Injectivity, Commercial Scale
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 385 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Reservoirs facing challenges such as high oil viscosity and high heterogeneity benefit from polymer flooding by decreasing unfavorable mobility ratios or improving crossflow. Despite this diversity of needs, polymer floods are often designed around a single point viscosity value, which doesn't account for variable shear rates in the porous media, in-situ viscosity, challenges with fluid injectivity, etc.
Polymers have diverse rheological characteristics. For example, synthetic polymers like HPAM are elastic and can range in their degree of shear sensitivity, while biopolymers like scleroglucan are inelastic and highly shear-thinning. We generated laboratory data for two such polymers, scleroglucan and an Acrylamide-ATBS Co-Polymer. We developed parameters to describe their rheological characteristics for a variety of models, including shear thinning, shear thickening and preshearing.
We then assessed the impact of these attributes on polymer flooding performance using UTCHEM, the University of Texas Chemical Flooding Reservoir Simulator. Polymer injectivity, viscosity, and shear rate were assessed for sensitivity to polymer rheology using simplified models of radial geometry. These results were correlated to laboratory experiments to ensure correct estimate of in-situ viscosities. Sensitivity to a variety of important parameters, including shear rate correction factor, simulation grid size, shear-thickening, and skin were also completed. A final sensitivity study was conducted using a heterogeneous reservoir model with the multiple patterns.
Simulations using the simplified radial model and the heterogeneous, commercial scale model support the same conclusion: the specifics of polymer rheology can have a significant impact on polymer flooding performance, and polymer rheology should be considered an important design attribute along with injection viscosity and retention. We show that injection of an elastic, HPAM-based polymer may require higher injection pressure or lower rates than a highly shear-thinning, inelastic biopolymer like scleroglucan. We also demonstrate how the differences in rheology impact reservoir pressure, in-situ viscosity distribution, in situ shear-rate distribution and flow into various reservoir layers.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||20|
Behr, A., & Rafiee, M. (2017, May 5). Prediction of Polymer Injectivity in Damaged Wellbore by Using Rheological Dependent Skin. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/186054-MS.
Cannella, W. J., Huh, C., & Seright, R. S. (1988, January 1). Prediction of Xanthan Rheology in Porous Media. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/18089-MS.
Delshad, M., Kim, D. H., Magbagbeola, O. A., Huh, C., Pope, G. A., & Tarahhom, F. (2008, January 1). Mechanistic Interpretation and Utilization of Viscoelastic Behavior of Polymer Solutions for Improved Polymer-Flood Efficiency. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/113620-MS.
Dupas, A., Henaut, I., Rousseau, D., Poulain, P., Tabary, R., Argillier, J.-F., & Aubry, T. (2013, April 8). Impact of Polymer Mechanical Degradation on Shear and Extensional Viscosities: Toward Better Injectivity Forecasts in Polymer Flooding Operations. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/164083-MS.
Fortenberry, R. 2013. Experimental Demonstration and Improvement of Chemical EOR Techniques in Heavy Oils. MS Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 2013. http://pge.utexas.edu/images/pdfs/theses13/fortenberry.pdf.
Fortenberry, R., Delshad, M., Suniga, P., Koyassan Veedu, F., Wang, P., Al-Kaaoud, H., Pope, G. A. (2016, April 11). Interwell ASP Pilot Design for Kuwait's Sabriyah-Mauddud. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/179703-MS
Fortenberry, R., Suniga, P., Delshad, M., Singh, B., AlKaaoud, H. A., Carlisle, C. T., & Pope, G. A. (2016, August 1). Design and Demonstration of New Single-Well Tracer Test for Viscous Chemical Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Fluids. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/178914-PA
Gaillard, N., Giovannetti, B., Leblanc, T., Thomas, A., Braun, O., & Favero, C. (2015, November 18). Selection of Customized Polymers to Enhance Oil Recovery from High Temperature Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/177073-MS.
Gogarty, W. B. (1967, June 1). Mobility Control with Polymer Solutions. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/1566-B.
Jennings, R. R., Rogers, J. H., & West, T. J. (1971, March 1). Factors Influencing Mobility Control by Polymer Solutions. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/2867-PA.
Jouenne, S., Klimenko, A., & Levitt, D. (2016, April 11). Tradeoffs between Emulsion and Powder Polymers for EOR. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/179631-MS.
Koh, H., Lee, V. B., & Pope, G. A. (2016, April 11). Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Polymers on Residual Oil Saturation. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/179683-MS.
Kulawardana, E. U., Koh, H., Kim, D. H., Liyanage, P. J., Upamali, K., Huh, C., Pope, G. A. (2012, January 1). Rheology and Transport of Improved EOR Polymers under Harsh Reservoir Conditions. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/154294-MS, L. (1989). Enhanced Oil Recovery. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Levitt, D., & Pope, G. A. (2008, January 1). Selection and Screening of Polymers for Enhanced-Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/113845-MS.
Leonhardt, B., Ernst, B., Reimann, S., Steigerwald, A., & Lehr, F. (2014, April 12). Field Testing the Polysaccharide Schizophyllan: Results of The First Year. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/169032-MS.
Li, Z., & Delshad, M. (2014, June 1). Development of an Analytical Injectivity Model for Non-Newtonian Polymer Solutions. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/163672-PA
Manichand, R. N., Moe Soe Let, K. P., Gil, L., Quillien, B., & Seright, R. S. (2013, September 4). Effective Propagation of HPAM Solutions Through the Tambaredjo Reservoir During a Polymer Flood. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/164121-PA.
Peaceman, D. W. (1983, June 1). Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation with Nonsquare Grid Blocks and Anisotropic Permeability. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/10528-PA.
Pope, G. A. (1980, June 1). The Application of Fractional Flow Theory to Enhanced Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/7660-PA.
Rivenq, R. C., Donche, A., & Nolk, C. (1992, February 1). Improved Scleroglucan for Polymer Flooding Under Harsh Reservoir Conditions. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/19635-PA.
Selle, O. M., Fischer, H., Standnes, D. C., Auflem, I. H., Lambertsen, A. M., Svela, P. E., Melien, I. (2013, September 30). Offshore Polymer/LPS Injectivity Test with Focus on Operational Feasibility and Near Wellbore Response in a Heidrun Injector. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/166343-MS.
Seright, R. S., Seheult, J. M., & Talashek, T. (2009, October 1). Injectivity Characteristics of EOR Polymers. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/115142-PA.
Seright, R. S. (1983, June 1). The Effects of Mechanical Degradation and Viscoelastic Behavior on Injectivity of Polyacrylamide Solutions. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/9297-PA.
Sharma, K. K., Mishra, S., Kumar, P., Pandey, A., Jain, S., Ghosh, P., Kushwaha, M. K. (2016, March 21). Polymer Injectivity Test in Bhagyam Field: Planning, Execution and Data Analysis. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/179821-MS
Shuler, P. J., Kuehne, D. L., Uhl, J. T., & Walkup, G. W. (1987, August 1). Improving Polymer Injectivity at West Coyote Field, California. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/13603-PA.
Suresh Kumar, M., Pandey, A., & Jha, M. K. (2012, January 1). Polymer Injectivity Test in Mangala Field - A Significant Step towards Field Wide Implementation. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/155162-MS
Yerramilli, S. S., Zitha, P. L. J., & Yerramilli, R. C. (2013, June 5). Novel Insight into Polymer Injectivity for Polymer Flooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/165195-MS.
Yuan, C. 2012. Commercial Scale Simulations of Surfactant/Polymer Flooding. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 2012. http://pge.utexas.edu/images/pdfs/theses12/yuan,changli.pdf.
Yuan, C., Delshad, M., & Wheeler, M. F. (2010, January 1). Parallel Simulations of Commercial-Scale Polymer Floods. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/132441-MS.
Zechner, M., Buchgraber, M., Clemens, T., Gumpenberger, T., Castanier, L. M., & Kovscek, A. R. (2013, September 30). Flow of Polyacrylamide Polymers in the Near-Wellbore-Region, Rheological Behavior within Induced Fractures and Near-Wellbore-Area. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/166085-MS.
Zaitoun, A., Makakou, P., Blin, N., Al-Maamari, R. S., Al-Hashmi, A.-A. R., & Abdel-Goad, M. (2012, June 1). Shear Stability of EOR Polymers. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 10.2118/141113-PA.