The Value of Focused Consensus Ecological Risk Assessments with Trans-Boundary Considerations for Oil Spill Response
- Geeva Varghese (Oil Spill Response Limited) | Thomas Coolbaugh (ExxonMobil) | Ann Hayward Walker (SEA Consulting Group)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Asia Pacific Health, Safety, Security, Environment and Social Responsibility Conference, 4-6 April, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2017. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 6.5.5 Oil and Chemical Spills, 7 Management and Information, 6.1 HSSE and Social Responsibility Management
- Global, Trans-Boundary, Comparative ERA, Regional, Risk Based
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 82 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
The risk of an oil spill in Asia Pacific region has escalated in recent years due to increases in maritime traffic and oil and gas activities. It is possible that oil spills may result in serious environmental and socio-economic consequences with long term detrimental effects to the wider community. Implementing effective response to an oil spill incident is a complex decision-making process involving the consideration of multiple variables such as available response technologies, operational factors and logistical constraints, and is often carried out in the face of incomplete information. A rapid decision making process is also needed as the effective implementation of the various options to mitigate the oil spill impacts may be reduced with time.
Comparative Ecological Risk Assessment is a widely accepted tool for evaluating ecological concerns that allows for the objective comparison of the relative risk contributed by each specific ‘stressor’ or ‘option’ being considered. The process facilitates optimum decision making through a more complete use of available information and participative consultation with key stakeholders.
The focus of this paper is the adaptation of the widely accepted comparative ecological risk assessment process towards a uniquely complex trans-boundary oil spill scenario for the Asia Pacific Region. The application of the comparative ecological risk assessment to region-specific scenarios will drew upon the authors' operational knowledge of responding to oil spills in the region and similar project studies conducted in other regions globally. While presenting oil spill response issues that are unique to Asia Pacific region, the paper will detail a fit for purpose comparative ecological risk assessment framework that can be implemented during a trans-boundary oil spill scenario with limited information and few resources. Emphasis will be given to problem formulation that takes temporal considerations and long term net benefits while combining expert judgment, stakeholder values and local knowledge to reach optimum decisions without undue stress on the resources available to do so.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||15|
Guavarra, J. 2014. The Global Initiative for South East Asia. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings: May 2014, Vol. 2014, No. 1, pp. 1375-138. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.7901/2169-3358-2014.L1375
Aurand, D.; Pond, R.; Coelho, G.; Cunningham, LCDR M.; Cocanaur, LCDR A.; Stevens, L. The Use Consensus Ecological Risk Assessments to Evaluate Oil Spill Response Options: Lessons Learned From Workshops in Nine Different Locations, Proceedings of International Oil Spill Conference, Miami Beach, FL, USA, 15-19 May 2005; pp. 379–386.
NOAA Office of Response and Restoration. Ecological Risk Assessment Workshops. Available online: http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/era (Accessed on 15 January 2017)
NOAA Office of Response and Restoration. Evaluating the performance of the Consensus Ecological Risk Assessment (C-ERA) process in improving oil spill response and planning. Available online: http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/C-ERAAssessmentIOSC2008.pdf (Accessed on 15 January 2017)
IPIECA. Net Environmental Benefit Analysis. Available online: http://www.oilspillresponseproiect.org/strategy/net-environmental-benefit-analysis/ (Accessed on 19 January 2017)
IPIECA. Oil Spill Risk Assessment and Response Planning for Offshore Installations. Available online: http://www.oilspillresponseproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/JIP-6-Oil-spill-risk-assessment.pdf (Accessed on 19 January)
IPIECA. Impacts of Oil Spills on Marine Ecology. Available online: http://www.oilspillresponseproject.org/impacts/ (Accessed on 19 January)
Owens, E.H., Shoreline Evaluation Methods Developed during the Nestucca Response in British Columbia, IOSC Proceedings 1991 Available online: http://www.ioscproceedings.org/doi/pdf/10.7901/2169-3358-1991-1-177
Yaroch, G.N. The Nestucca Major Oil Spill; A Christmas Story, IOSC Proceedings 1991. Available online:http://www.ioscproceedings.org/doi/pdf/10.7901/2169-3358-1991-1-263
Storrie, J., Montara Wellhead Platform Oil Spill – A Remote Area Response, IOSC Proceedings 2011 Available online: http://www.ioscproceedings.org/doi/pdf/10.7901/2169-3358-2011-1-159