Multi-Well, Multi-Phase Flowing Material Balance
- M. S. Shahamat (University of Calgary) | C. R. Clarkson (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, 15-16 February, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2017. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.3 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 0.2 Wellbore Design, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 0.2.2 Geomechanics, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation
- Unconventional Reservoirs, Multi-Well, Pseudo-pressure, Flowing Material Balance, Tight and Shale
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 518 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Flowing material balance (FMB) analysis is a practical method for determining original hydrocarbon volumes in-place. It is attractive because it enables performing material balance calculations without having to shut-in wells to obtain estimates of reservoir pressure. However, with some exceptions, its application is limited to single-phase oil and/or gas reservoirs over limited pressure ranges during depletion. In unconventional reservoirs, reservoir and/or production complexities may further restrict FMB usage. Among these complexities are significant production/injection of water, production resulting in higher Gas-Oil-Ratios and pressure drawdowns, geomechanical effects, and multi-well production effects. As a result, application of the conventional FMB to unconventional reservoirs may lead to significant errors in hydrocarbons-in-place estimation.
This paper first discusses the application of conventional FMB to the analysis of single or multi-phase flow in single or multi-well scenarios, and then provides a new, comprehensive version of the FMB to address the above-mentioned complications. For the new FMB, pseudo-pressure is used to account for two-phase oil and gas flow. In addition, by using a general material balance equation, water production/injection and multi-well effects are included in the analysis. The new FMB analysis approach is validated by comparing results against numerical simulation of multi-fractured horizontal wells (MFHWs). These comparisons demonstrate that, not only gas production, but also water production/injection, can have a significant effect on the calculated original in-place hydrocarbon volumes. The new FMB analysis approach provided herein successfully accounts for all flowing phases in the reservoir, and is demonstrated to be applicable for multi-well scenarios.
The methodology presented in this paper maintains the simplicity of FMB, yet accounts for multi-phase flow and multi-well complications. The developed FMB and the presented approach can be used by reservoir engineers to reasonably determine the original volumes of hydrocarbons in-place in both conventional and unconventional reservoirs.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||28|
Boe, A., Skjaeveland, S.M., and Whitson, C.H. 1989. Two-Phase Pressure Test Analysis. SPE Form Eval. 4 (4): 604-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/10224-PA.
Clarkson, C.R. 2009. Case Study: Production Data and Pressure Transient Analysis of Horseshoe Canyon CBM Wells. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 48 (10): 27-38. SPE-114485-PA. doi: 10.2118/114485-PA.
Clarkson, C.R., Bustin, R.M., and Seidle, J.P. 2007. Production-Data Analysis of Single-Phase (Gas) Coalbed-Methane Wells. SPE Res Eval & Eng 10 (3): 312-331. SPE-100313-PA. doi: 10.2118/100313-PA.
Clarkson, C.R., Jordan, C.L., Gierhart, R.R., and Seidle, J.P. 2008. Production Data Analysis of Coalbed-Methane Wells. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 11 (02): 311-325. SPE-107705-PA. doi: 10.2118/107705-PA
Fevang, O., and Whitson, C.H. 1996. Modeling Gas-Condensate Well Deliverability. SPE Res Eng 11 (4): 221–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/30714-PA.
Jones, J.R., and Raghavan, R. 1988. Interpretation of Flowing Well Response in Gas-Condensate Wells. SPE Form Eval 3 (3): 578-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/14204-PA
Jones, J.R., Vo, D.T., and Raghavan, R. 1989. Interpretation of Pressure-Buildup Responses in Gas-Condensate Wells. SPE Form Eval 4 (1): 93-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15535-PA.
Kondash, A., and Vengosh, A. 2015. Water Footprint of Hydraulic Fracturing. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2015, 2, 276-280. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00211.
Mattar, L., and McNeil, R. 1998. The "Flowing" Gas Material Balance. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 37 (02): 52-55. doi: 10.2118/98-02-06
Morad, K. and Clarkson, C.R. 2008. Application of Flowing p/Z* Material Balance for Dry Coalbed-Methane Reservoirs. Paper SPE 114995 presented at the CIPC/SPE Gas Technology Symposium 2008 Joint Conference, Calgary, 16-19 June. doi: 10.2118/114995-MS.
Raghavan, R. 1976. Well-Test Analysis: Wells Producing by Solution Gas Drive. SPEJ 16 (4): 196-208; Trans., AIME, 261. SPE-5588-PA. DOI: 10.2118/5588-PA.
Shahamat, M. S., Mattar, L., and Aguilera, R. 2015. A Physics-Based Method To Forecast Production From Tight and Shale Petroleum Reservoirs by Use of Succession of Pseudosteady States. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 18 (04): 508-522. SPE-167686-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/167686-PA.
Stalgorova, E. and Mattar, L. 2016. Analytical Methods for Single-Phase Oil Flow: Accounting for Changing Liquid and Rock Properties. Paper SPE 180139 presented at the SPE Europec featured at 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 30 May-02 June. doi: 10.2118/180139-MS.
Sureshjani, M.H., Behmanesh, H., and Clarkson, C.R. 2013. Multi-Well Gas Reservoirs Production Data Analysis. Paper SPE 167159 presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, Calgary, 5–7 November. doi: 10.2118/167159-MS.
Sureshjani, M.H., Gerami, S., and Emadi, M.A. 2014. A Simple Approach to Dynamic Material Balance in Gas-Condensate Reservoirs. Journal of Oil & Gas Science and Technology 69 (2): 307-317. DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2012022.