A Model for the Conductivity and Compliance of Unpropped Fractures
- Weiwei Wu (The University of Texas at Austin) | Mukul M. Sharma (The University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, 24–26 January, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2017. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3 Production and Well Operations, 3 Production and Well Operations
- fracture closure, Fracture Stiffness, rock mechanical properties, roughness, fracture conductivity
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 500 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Fluid flow in unpropped and natural fractures is critical in many geophysical processes and engineering applications. The flow conductivity in these fractures depends on their closure under stress, which is a complicated mechanical process that is chanllenging to model. The chanllenges come from the deformation interaction and the close coupling among the fracture geometry, pressure and deformation, making the closure computationally expensive to describe. Hence, most of the previous models either use a small grid system or disregard deformation interaction or plastic deformation.
In this study, a numerical model is developed to simulate the stress-driven closure and the conductivity for fractures with rough surfaces. The model integrates elastoplastic deformation and deformation interaction, and can handle contact between heterogeneous surfaces. Computation is optimized and accelterated by employing an algorithm that combines the conjugate-gradient method and the fast Fourier transfrom technique. Computation time is significantly reduced compared to traditional methods. For example a 5 orders of magnitude speedup is obtained for a grid size of 512 by 512. The model is validated against analytical problems and experiments, for both elastic-only and elastoplastic scenarios.
It is shown that interaction between asperities and plastic deformation can not be ignored when modeling fracture closure. By applying our model, roughness and yield stress are found to have a larger impact on fracture closure and compliance than Young's modulus. Plastic deformation is a dominant contributor to closure and can make up more than 70% of the total closure in some shales. The plastic deformation also significantly alters the relationship between fracture stiffness and conductivity. Surfaces with reduced correlation length produce greater conductivity due to their larger apertures, despite more fracture closure. They have a similar fraction of area in contact as surfaces with longer fracture length, but the pattern of area in contact is more scattered. Contact between heterogeneous surfaces leads to increased plastic deformation and fracture closure, and results in lower fracture conductivity. Fracture compliance appears not be sensitive to the distribution pattern of hard and soft components. Our model compares well with experimental data for fracture closure, and can be applied to unpropped or natural fractures.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||29|
Ai, X. and Sawamiphakdi, K., 1999. Solving elastic contact between rough surfaces as an unconstrained strain energy minimization by using CGM and FFT techniques. Journal of tribology, 121(4):639-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.2834117
Bandis, S.C., Lumsden, A.C. and Barton, N.R., 1983. Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 20(6): 249-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(83)90595-8
Berthe, D. and Vergne, P., 1987. An elastic approach to rough contact with asperity interactions. Wear, 117(2):211-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(87)90256-0
Brown, S.R. and Scholz, C.H., 1985. Closure of random elastic surfaces in contact. J. geophys. Res, 90(B7):5531-5545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/jb090ib07p05531
Brush, D.J. and Thomson, N.R., 2003. Fluid flow in synthetic rough-walled fractures: Navier-Stokes, Stokes, and local cubic law simulations. Water Resources Research, 39(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002wr001346
Deng, J., Hill, A.D. and Zhu, D., 2011. A theoretical study of acid-fracture conductivity under closure stress. SPE Prod & Oper., 26(01): 9-17. SPE-124755-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124755-pa
Far, M.E., de Figueiredo, J.J., Stewart, R.R., Castagna, J.P., Han, D.H. and Dyaur, N., 2014. Measurements of seismic anisotropy and fracture compliances in synthetic fractured media. Geophysical Journal International, 197:1845-1857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu101
Fischer-Cripps, A.C., 2011. Nanoindentation, 3rd edtion. New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9872-9
Gangi, A.F., 1978. Variation of whole and fractured porous rock permeability with confining pressure. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 15(5): 249-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(78)90957-9
Garcia, N. and Stoll, E., 1984. Monte Carlo calculation for electromagnetic-wave scattering from random rough surfaces. Physical review letters, 52(20):1798-1801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.52.1798
Gong, M., Lacote, S. and Hill, A.D., 1999. New Model of Acid-Fracture Conductivity Based on Deformation of Surface Asperities. SPE J. 4(3): 206-214. SPE-57017-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/57017-PA.
Greenwood, J.A. and Williamson, J.B.P., 1966. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 295(142):300-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1966.0242
Kamali, A. and Pournik, M., 2016. Fracture closure and conductivity decline modeling–Application in unpropped and acid etched fractures. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 14:44-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2016.02.001
Kumar, V., Sondergeld, C. and Rai, C. 2012. Nano to Macro Mechanical Characterization of Shale. Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, 8-10 October. SPE-159804-MS http://doi.org/10.2118/159804-MS.
Liu, S., Wang, Q. and Liu, G., 2000. A versatile method of discrete convolution and FFT (DC-FFT) for contact analyses. Wear, 243(1):101-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1648(00)00427-0
Nierode, D. and Kruk, K., 1973. An Evaluation of Acid Fluid Loss Additives Retarded Acids and Acidized Fracture Conductivity. Presented at Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Las Vegas, Nevada, 30 September-3 October. SPE-4549-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4549-MS.
Nieto, C.M., Pournik, M. and Hill, A.D. 2008. The Texture of Acidized Fracture Surfaces: Implications for Acid Fracture Conductivity. SPE Prod & Oper 23(3): 343-352. SPE-102167-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102167-PA.
Ruffet, C., Fery, J.J. and Onaisi, A. 1998. Acid Fracturing Treatment: A Surface-Topography Analysis of Acid-Etched Fractures To Determine Residual Conductivity. SPE J. 3(2): 155-162. SPE-38175-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/38175-PA.
Polonsky, I.A. and Keer, L.M., 1999. A numerical method for solving rough contact problems based on the multi-level multi-summation and conjugate gradient techniques. Wear, 231(2):206-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1648(99)00113-1
Pyrak-Nolte, L.J. and Morris, J.P., 2000. Single fractures under normal stress: The relation between fracture specific stiffness and fluid flow. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 37(1):245-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1365-1609(99)00104-5
Pyrak-Nolte, L.J. and Nolte, D.D., 2016. Approaching a universal scaling relationship between fracture stiffness and fluid flow. Nature communications, 7:10663-10668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10663
Sharma, M.M. and Manchanda, R. 2015. The Role of Induced Un-propped (IU) Fractures in Unconventional Oil and Gas Wells. Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Houston, Texas, 28-30 September. SPE-174946-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/174946-MS.
Sone, H. and Zoback, M.D., 2013. Mechanical properties of shale-gas reservoir rocks—Part 1: Static and dynamic elastic properties and anisotropy. Geophysics, 78(5):D381-D392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0050.1
Swan, G., 1983. Determination of stiffness and other joint properties from roughness measurements. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 16(1):19-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01030216
Tsang, Y.W. and Tsang, C.F., 1987. Channel model of flow through fractured media. Water Resources Research, 23(3):.467-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/wr023i003p00467
Wang, L. and Cardenas, M.B. 2016. Development of an empirical model relating permeability and specific stiffness for rough fractures from numerical deformation experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(7): 4977-4989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016jb013004.
Walsh, J.B. and Grosenbaugh, M.A., 1979. A new model for analyzing the effect of fractures on compressibility. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 84(B7): 3532-3536. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/jb084ib07p03532
Wu, W. and Sharma, M.M. 2016. Acid Fracturing Shales: Effect of Dilute Acid on Properties and Pore Structure of Shale. SPE Prod & Oper. (In press; posted April 2016). SPE-173390-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/173390-PA.
Wu, W. and Sharma, M.M. 2017. A Model for the Conductivity and Compliance of Unpropped Fractures. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 24-26 January. SPE- 184852-MS. http://dx.doi.org10.2118/184852-MS.