An Evaluation of Underground Storage as a Potential Solution for Stranded Associated Gas in Oil Fields
- Kazeem A. Lawal (FIRST E&P) | Mathilda I. Ovuru (FIRST E&P) | Stella I. Eyitayo (FIRST E&P) | Saka Matemilola (FIRST E&P) | Ayodeji T. Adeniyi (Centre for Petroleum, Energy Economics & Law, University of Ibadan)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, 2-4 August, Lagos, Nigeria
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2016. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.9.1 Gas Hydrates, 2.7 Completion Fluids, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.9 Non-Traditional Resources, 2 Well completion, 5.7 Reserves Evaluation, 6.3 Safety, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 2.7.1 Completion Fluids, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 133 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
In the absence of a gas market, the management of the gas associated with oil production often poses serious challenges to the development of oil fields, resulting in potentially stranded gas resources. While gas flaring was the default solution, more stringent carbon constraints have rendered this solution unattractive, owing to its negative health, safety, environmental and socio-economic impacts. One potential solution entails injecting the otherwise stranded associated gas (AG) into underground geologic systems for temporary storage, but re-producing same when a viable gas market becomes available.
Faced with the challenge of providing temporary AG solution for a new oil development in the shallow offshore area of the Niger Delta, this paper presents an overview of candidate solutions, which include (i) venting, (ii) flaring, (iii) injection for improved oil recovery, (iv) underground sequestration (AG injected but not re-produced), and (v) on-site conversion to natural-gas hydrates to facilitate evacuation to other outlets. Their relative strengths and weaknesses are examined relative to this case study.
The paper details the key aspects of a reservoir-engineering assessment of temporary AG storage in a non-associated gas (NAG) reservoir for later monetisation of both the native NAG and alien (injected) AG resources. Rigorous numerical-simulation studies highlight the key factors that control both the injection and production phases of the subject reservoir. For a given set of abandonment conditions, effects of the gas volume injected prior to the production phase on the ultimate recovery factors of the native and alien gas resources are presented. Additionally, the relative advantages of matrix, pseudo-fractured, and fractured injection modes are explored.
Compared against the above-mentioned alternative solutions in terms of (i) effective sales volume of hydrocarbon, (ii) infrastructural requirements, and (iii) net carbon savings, underground storage is the most attractive solution to address stranded AG in this example field, and possibly others.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||17|
McCarthy, J. J., Canziani, O. F., Leary, N. A., Dokken, D. J. and White, K. S. (2001). "Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability". Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.