Years of Tight Oil Fracturing: What Have We Learned?
- Yucai Wang (Jilin Oilfield) | Zhonghe P. Wang (IUT Group) | Yingan Zhang (Jilin Oilfield, PetroChina) | Jianguo Xu (Jilin Oilfield, PetroChina) | Yongwei Duan (Jilin Oilfield, PetroChina)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Asia Pacific Hydraulic Fracturing Conference, 24-26 August, Beijing, China
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2016. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.1 Completion Selection and Design, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 6.1 HSSE & Social Responsibility Management, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.1.3 Completion Equipment, 0.2 Wellbore Design, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 6.1.5 Human Resources, Competence and Training, 2.2 Installation and Completion Operations, 2.1 Completion Selection and Design, 6 Health, Safety, Security, Environment and Social Responsibility, 2.2.2 Perforating, 0.2.2 Geomechanics
- Net Present Value, Improvement strategies, Effective Propped Volume vs SRV, horizontal well multi-stage fracture, Fracture optimization
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 431 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Production rapid decline is the major problem for the tight sandstone reservoirs in Jilin oilfield. For the particular reservoir investigated in this study, production is not only subjected to the reservoir properties, but also the well completion designs especially fracturing. A comprehensive study has been conducted for multi-stage fractured horizontal wells. New fracturing improvement strategies are presented in this paper for future operations in the studied field and also those who may have similar tight sandstone reservoirs to share.
Through the integrated studies of the petrophysical characteristics, geomechanical properties and fracturing data from the fractured wells of the tight oil reservoirs in Jilin Field, numerous fracturing modeling scenarios were compared with actual fracturing monitoring data. A fully three dimension finite element simulation, associated with the analytical result from earlier production data, and the theory of interaction between fracture clusters, were built in this study. We conducted the inversing design parameters from the multi-stage hydraulic fracture with some monitoring data to improve the understanding of the reservoir properties. Additionally, a calibrated geomechanical stress model for a completed well in this field was built. At the end, the production model was presented. Data was provided to facilitate later comparison with the actual multi-stage hydraulic fracture production and valuable lessons have learned through those iteration studies.
With thoroughly trained and well calibrated model, a new fracturing strategy has been developed for the studied tight oil field. The best NPV can be achieved with the optimal fracture conductivity, fracture geometry and well performance. But first of all, the most valuable lesson we learned is that, the Effective Propped Volume (EPV) is the dominating factor for the fractured well performance, instead of the so-called Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV). SRV is a misinterpreted concept yet un-calculable. By adopting a numerical simulator and a proficient technology, we developed the most suitable design (perforation, fracture spacing etc.) and the fluid system (slick water, linear gel etc.) for this reservoir so that the optimal fracture geometry and fracture conductivity can be achieved. Besides that, the fracture geometry and proppant distribution were simulated. The simulated oil production data from the finite element fracture and production software is highly matched with the recorded oil production data.
An adaptability evaluation was conducted along with this study. To ensure the relevance and the authenticity of design, we analyzed the effective factors of treating material from both the laboratory and the field data in this field. A novel fracturing fluid system was applied. The fluids are more effective and leave less damage to the formation.
|File Size||5 MB||Number of Pages||17|
Cipolla, C., and Wallace, J. 2014. Stimulated Reservoir Volume: A Misapplied Concept? paper SPE 168596 presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodland, Texas, USA, 4-6 February. doi:10.2118/168596-MS.
Ennis, M. 2014. The Rough Guid to Frackistan. TexasMonthly, May 2014, http://www.texasmonthly.com/politics/the-rough-guide-to-frackistan/ (accessed June 27 2016)
Fisher, M. K., Heinze, J. R., Harris, C. D., Davidson, B. M., Wright, C. A., and Dunn, K. P. 2004. Optimizing Horizontal Completion Techniques in the Barnett Shale Using Microseismic Fracture Mapping. paper SPE 90051 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 26-29 September. doi:10.2118/90051-MS.
Jin, X., Shah, S. N., Roegiers, J.-C., and Zhang, B. 2014. Fracability Evaluation in Shale Reservoirs - An Integrated Petrophysics and Geomechanics Approach. paper SPE 168589 presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodland, Texas, USA, 4-6 February. doi:10.2118/168589-MS.
Mayerhofer, M. J., Lolon, E., Warpinski, N. R., Cipolla, C. L., Walser, D. W., and Rightmire, C. M. 2010, What Is Stimulated Reservoir Volume? SPE Prod & Oper. 25(01): 89–98. doi:10.2118/119890-PA.
Olson, J. E., and Taleghani, A. D. 2009. Modeling Simultaneous Growth of Multiple Hydraulic Fractures and Their Interaction with Natural Fractures. paper SPE 119739 presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Conference, The Woodland, Texas, USA, 19-21 January. doi:10.2118/119739-MS
Olson, J. E., and Wu, K. 2012. Sequential vs. Simultaneous Multizone Fracturing in Horizontal Wells: Insights From a Non-Planar, Multifrac Numerical Model. paper SPE 152602 presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodland, Texas, USA, 6-8 February. doi:10.2118/152602-MS
Palmer, I. D., Moschovidis, Z. A., Schaefer, A., and Mcketta, S. 2014. Case Histories from Fayettville Shale: SRV Sizes, Fracture Networks, Spacing, Aperture Widths, and Implications for Proppant. paper SPE 169015 presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, The Woodland, Texas, USA, 1-3 April. doi:10.2118/169015-MS.
Rickman, R., Mullen, M. J., Petre, J. E., Grieser, W. V., and Kundert, D. 2008. A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale. Paper presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, 21-24 September.
Sierra, L., Mayerhofer, M., and Jin, C.J. 2013. Production Forecasting of Hydraulically Fractured Conventional Low-Permeability and Unconventional Reservoir Linking the More Detailed Fracture and Reservoir Parameters. paper SPE 163833 presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodland, TX, USA, 4-6 February.
Slatt, R. M., and Abousleiman, Y. 2011. Merging Sequence Stratigraphy and Geomechanics for Unconventional Gas Shales. The Leading Edge, 30(3), 274–282. doi:10.1190/1.3567258.
Vermilye, J., and Sicking, C. 2016. Microseismic Maps Production Volume. THE AMERICAN OIL & GAS REPORTER, January 2016, http://www.globalgeophysical.com/docs/AOGR%20Jan%202016%20Production%20Monitoring.pdf (accessed June 27 2016).