A Model for Optimizing Energy Investments and Policy under Uncertainty
- Hasan A. Al-Ahmadi (Saudi Aramco) | Duane A. McVay (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 26-28 September, Dubai, UAE
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2016. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 7.4.5 Future of energy/oil and gas, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 7 Management and Information, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 7.4 Energy Economics, 5.6.3 Deterministic Methods, 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, 7.4.3 Market analysis /supply and demand forecasting/pricing
- Stochastic Optimization, Energy Modeling, Portfolio Optimization, Uncertainty Quantification, Sustainability
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 170 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
An energy producer must determine optimal energy investment strategies in order to maximize the value of its energy portfolio. Determining optimal energy investment strategies is challenging. One of the main challenges is the large uncertainty in many of the parameters involved in the optimization process. Most existing large-scale energy models are deterministic and so have limited capability for assessing uncertainty. Modelers usually use scenario analysis to address model input uncertainty.
In this paper, we describe a coarse probabilistic model developed for optimizing energy investments and policies from an energy producer's perspective. The model uses a top-down approach to probabilistically forecast primary energy demand. Distributions rather than static values are used to model uncertainty in the input variables. The model can be applied to a country-level energy system. It maximizes portfolio expected net present value (ENPV) while ensuring energy sustainability. The model is built in MS Excel® using the @RISK add-in, which is capable of modeling uncertain parameters and performing stochastic simulation optimization.
The model was applied to synthetic data for a typical fossil-fuel-dependent country to determine its optimum energy strategy. For this synthetic case, the model suggests that the subject country should increase its oil production capacity slightly higher than its current level, increase its gas production, and meet most of its future power generation (electricity) demand using alternative energy sources—nuclear, solar, and wind.
A primary contribution of this work is rigorously addressing uncertainty quantification in energy modeling. The model could be applied, with minor modification, by either companies or countries to assist in determining optimal energy investment strategies.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||26|
Bhattacharyya, S.C. and Timilsina, G.R. 2010. A Review of Energy System Models. International Journal of Energy Sector Management 4 (4): 494-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506221011092742.
Brashear, J.P., Becker, A.B., and Faulder, D.D. 2001. Where Have All the Profits Gone? J Pet Tech 53 (6). SPE-73141-JPT. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/73141-JPT.
Brashear, J.P., Becker, A.B., and Gabriel, S.A. 1999. Interdependencies among E&P Projects and Portfolio Risk Management. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 3-6 October. SPE-56574-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/56574-MS.
Brier, G.W. 1950. Verification of Forecasts Expressed in Terms of Probability. Monthly Weather Review 78 (1): 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:vofeit>2.0.co;2.
Bukhari, A.A. and Jablonowski, C.J. 2012. Optimization of Production Allocation under Price Uncertainty: Relating Price Model Assumptions to Decisions. Presented at the SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Mexico City, Mexico, 16-18 April. SPE-151673-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/151673-MS.
Capen, E.C. 1976. The Difficulty of Assessing Uncertainty (Includes Associated Papers 6422 and 6423 and 6424 and 6425). J Pet Technol 28 (08): 843 - 850. SPE-5579-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/5579-PA.
Chakravorty, U., Roumasset, J., and Tse, K. 1997. Endogenous Substitution among Energy Resources and Global Warming. Journal of Political Economy 105 (6): 1201-1234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/516390.
Cooper, J.C.B. 2003. Price Elasticity of Demand for Crude Oil: Estimates for 23 Countries. OPEC Review 27 (1): 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0076.00121.
EIA. 2016. The Natural Gas Wellhead Decontrol Act of 1989. U.S. Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.gov/oil_gas/natural_gas/analysis_publications/ngmajorleg/ngact1989.html (accessed 22 June 2016).
Eidt, B.D. 2012. Global Energy Management System. Presented at the Carbon Management Technology Conference, Orlando, Florida, 7-9 February. CMTC-151218-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.7122/151218-MS.
Fondren, M., McVay, D., and Gonzalez, R. 2013. Applying Calibration to Improve Uncertainty Assessment. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September - 2 October. SPE-166422-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/166422-MS.
Gao, W., Hartley, P., and Sickles, R. 2009. Optimal Dynamic Production from a Large Oil Field in Saudi Arabia. Empir Econ 37 (1): 153-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-008-0227–9.
Kann, A. and Weyant, J. 2000. Approaches for Performing Uncertainty Analysis in Large-Scale Energy/Economic Policy Models. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 5 (1): 29-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1019041023520.
Matar, W., Murphy, F., Pierru, A.. 2015. Lowering Saudi Arabia's Fuel Consumption and Energy System Costs without Increasing End Consumer Prices. Energy Economics 49: 558-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.019.
McCarl, B.A. and Spreen, T.H. 2003. Applied Mathematical Programming Using Algebraic Systems: http://agecon2.tamu.edu/people/faculty/mccarl-bruce/mccspr/thebook.pdf.
McVay, D.A. and Dossary, M.N. 2014. The Value of Assessing Uncertainty. SPE Econ & Mgmt 6 (2): 100-110. SPE-160189-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/160189-PA.
Nakata, T. 2004. Energy-Economic Models and the Environment. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 30 (4): 417-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2004.03.001.
Pfenninger, S., Hawkes, A., and Keirstead, J. 2014. Energy Systems Modeling for Twenty-First Century Energy Challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 33: 74-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003.
Pye, S., Usher, W., and Strachan, N. 2014. The Uncertain but Critical Role of Demand Reduction in Meeting Long-Term Energy Decarbonisation Targets. Energy Policy 73: 575-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.025.
Shlyakhter, A.I., Kammen, D.M., Broido, C.L.. 1994. Quantifying the Credibility of Energy Projections from Trends in Past Data: The Us Energy Sector. Energy Policy 22 (2): 119-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90129–5.
Timilsina, G.R. 2011. Sectoral Models for Energy and Climate Policies. PowerPoint Slides. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMACEDONIA/Resources/GG_EnergySectorModels.pdf Accessed 11/01/2012.
Tschang, F.T. and Dowlatabadi, H. 1995. A Bayesian Technique for Refining the Uncertainty in Global Energy Model Forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting 11 (1): 43-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(94)02010-M.
Weijermars, R., Taylor, P., Bahn, O.. 2012. Review of Models and Actors in Energy Mix Optimization – Can Leader Visions and Decisions Align with Optimum Model Strategies for Our Future Energy Systems? Energy Strategy Reviews 1 (1): 5-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2011.10.001.