Industrial Waste Injection Feasibility in North Dakota

Authors
I. M. Mohamed (Advantek Waste Management Services) | G. Block (Advantek Waste Management Services) | O. Abou-Sayed (Advantek Waste Management Services) | A. S. Abou-Sayed (Advantek Waste Management Services)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/181678-MS
Document ID
SPE-181678-MS
Publisher
Society of Petroleum Engineers
Source
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 26-28 September, Dubai, UAE
Publication Date
2016
Document Type
Conference Paper
Language
English
ISBN
978-1-61399-463-4
Copyright
2016. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Disciplines
5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 6.3 Safety, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 6.5.4 Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials, 6.3.3 Operational Safety, 1.8 Formation Damage, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics
Keywords
re-injection, North Dakota, NORM, Class I wells
Downloads
4 in the last 30 days
156 since 2007
Show more detail
View rights & permissions
SPE Member Price: USD 8.50
SPE Non-Member Price: USD 25.00

Class I and Class II waste re-injection are the most important methods for disposing of fluid in North Dakota: in 2007, more than 96% of produced water were disposed of using underground injection, and by 2012 all produced water was being managed by underground injection. While Class II injection covers waste produced from most Exploration & Production (E&P) activities, Class I injection wells are used for disposing of a special class of industrial wastes, including waste generated by petroleum refining, metal production, chemical production, pharmaceutical production, commercial disposal, and food production. Non-hazardous industrial waste and Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) not associated with E&P can also be injected using Class I wells. In all cases, the primary concern for permitting and safe operations is to (1) predict the movement of the injected waste to ensure that it stays within pre-defined formations, and (2) ensure that pore-pressure increases caused by injection do not impact neighboring offset wells.

Results from a geochemical study of the feasibility of disposal into the Dakota Sands (Inyan Kara formation) in North Dakota will be presented. Analyses were made using a compositional reservoir simulation (REVEAL) to predict the pore-pressure distribution, direction and movement of the injected fluid, as well as chemical reactions between formation brine/waste/formation rocks and the effect of these chemical reactions on formation injectivity and cap rock integrity. Forecasts indicate that over 50 years of injection the injected wastes will be completely trapped within the Dakota Sands (no fluid flow is expected to penetrate through the cap rock) and injection pressures are expected to remain well below the estimated fracture pressure. While the Inyan Kara formation is therefore a reasonable storage trap for industrial wastes, carbonate and sulfate scales may cause near wellbore formation damage and rising wellhead pressures which operators will need to address.

File Size  12 MBNumber of Pages   23

Supporting information

  • SUPPLEMENTARY/SPE-181678-SUP.pdf

Armstrong, C.A. 1967. "County Groundwater Studies 9 &- Part II". North Dakota State Water Conservation Commission.

Bluemle, J.P., Anderson, S.B., Andrew, J.A., Fischer, D.W., and LeFever, J.A. 1986. North Dakota Stratigraphic Column. North Dakota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Series 66, sheet 1.

Bredehoeft, J. D., C. E. Neuzil, and P. C. D. Milly (1983), Regional flow in the Dakota aquifer: A study of the role of confining layers, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Supply Pap., 2237, 45 pp.

Butler, R.D., 1984, Hydrogeology of Dakota Aquifer system, Williston Basin, North Dakota, in Jorgensen, D.G., and Signor, D.C., eds., Geohydrology of the Dakota Aquifier, National Water Well Association, C.V. Thesis Conference on Geohydrology, 1st, Lincoln, Nebraska, Proceedings: p. 14&-23.

Case, H.L., III, 1984, Hydrology of Inyan Kara and Dakota-Newcastle aquifer system, South Dakota, in Jorgensen, D.G., and Signor, D.C., eds., Geohydrology of the Dakota Aquifier, National Water Well Association, C.V. Thesis Conference on Geohydrology, 1st, Lincoln, Nebraska, Proceedings: p. 147&-165.

Eaton, B.A., 1969, Fracture gradient prediction and its applications in oilfield operations: Journal of Petroleum Technology, p. 1353&-1360.

Eaton, B.A. 1975. Equation for Geopressure Prediction from Well Logs. Paper SPE 5544 presented at the Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, Texas.

https://www.epa.gov/uic/class-i-industrial-and-municipal-waste-disposal-wells.

Ferguson, R.J., and Ferguson, B.R. 2010. The Chemistry of Strontium and Barium Scales. Association of Water Technologies, Reno, NV, USA.

Fooshee, J.S., 2009. "The Development of a Pore Pressure and Fracture Gradient Prediction Model for the Ewing Banks 910 Area in the Gulf of Mexico." M.S. Thesis. Louisiana State University.

Gaus, I., Azaroual, M., and Czernichowski-Lauriol, I. 2005. "Reactive transport modeling of the impact of CO2 injection on the clayey cap rock at Sleipner (North Sea)". Chemical Geology 217 (3): 319&- 337.

Goldstein, A. 1984. Cementation of Dakota Sandstone of Colorado Front Range. Journal of Sedimentary Research 18(3):108&-125.

Gries, J.P., Rahan, P.H., and Barker, R.K. 1976. A Pump Test in the Dakota Sandstone at Wall, South Dakota. South Dakota Geological Survey Circular 43, 9P.

Hall, H.N. 1953. Compressibility of Reservoir Rocks, Transactions AIME. 198, 309.

Hantush, M.S. and C.E. Jacob, 1955. Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer, Am. Geophys. Union Trans. 36(1): 95&-100.

Jacob, C.E. 1950. Flow of ground water, chap. 5 in Rouse unter. Engineering hydraulics: New York, John Wiley & Sons.

Joeckel, R.M., Ludvigson, G.A., Witzke, B.J., Kvale, E.P., Phillips, P.L., Brenner, R.L., Thomas, S.G., Howard, L.M., 2004. Paleogeography and fluvial to estuarine architecture of the Dakota Formation (Cretaceous, Albian), Eastern Nebraska, USA. In Blum, M.D, Marriott, S.B., and Leclair, S.F., eds., "Fluvial Sedimentology 7". Special Publication, International Association of Sedimentologists, p. 453&-480.

Karl, H.A. 1976. Depositional history of Dakota Formation (Cretaceous) Sandstones, southeastern Nebraska. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 46: 124&-131.

Knauss, K.G., Johnson, J.W., and Steefel, C.I. 2005. Evaluation of the impact of CO2, co-contaminant gas, aqueous fluid and reservoir rock interactions on the geologic sequestration of CO2. Chemical Geology 217 (3): 339&-350.

Konikow, L.F., 1976, Preliminary digital model of ground-water flow in the Madison Group, Powder River Basin and adjacent areas, Wyoming, South Dakota, North Dakota, and Nebraska: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations 63&-75.

Lohman, S. W. 1972. Ground-water hydraulics: U.S. Geol. Survey Professional Paper 708, 70 p.

Matthews, C.S., and Russell, D.G. 1967. Pressure Buildup and Flow Tests in Wells. SPE Monograph Series Vol. 1.

Milly, C.D. 1978. Mathematical models of ground water flow and sulphate transport in the major aquifers of South Dakota. Princeton University, unpublished M.S. thesis, 46pp.

Mito, S., Xue, Z., and Ohsumi, T., 2008. Case study of geochemical reactions at the Nagaoka CO2 injection site, Japan. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2(3): 309&-318.

Neuzil, C.E. 1980. Fracture leakage in the Cretaceous Pierre shale and its significance for underground waste disposal. John Hopkins University, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, 139 pp.

Rogiers, J.C., Fairhurst, C., and Detournay, E. 1987. A comparative energetic analysis of modes of failure around underground excavation in overturned rock. Proc., 6th ISRM Congress, Montreal, Canada.

Shoon, R.A. 1971. Geology and Hydrology of the Dakota Formation in South Dakota. Report of investigations (South Dakota Geological Survey): no. 104.

Siega, F.L., Herras, E.B., and Buñing, B.C. 2005. Calcite Scale Inhibition: The Case of Mahanagdong Wells in Leyte Geothermal Production Field, Philippines. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress. Antalya, Turkey.

Veil, J. 2015. U.S. Produced Water Volumes and Management Practice in 2012. Report prepared for the ground water protection council.

Ward, C.D., Coghill, K., and Broussard, M.D. 1995. Brief: Pore and Fracture-pressure determinations: Effective-stress approach. Journal of Petroleum Technology 47(2):123&-124.

Wartman, B.L. 1983. Stratigraphy of Inyan Kara formation (lower Cretaceous) in vicinity of the Nesson anticline, northwest North Dakota. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota.

Other Resources

Looking for more? 

Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.


  

PetroWiki was initially created from the seven volume  Petroleum Engineering Handbook (PEH) published by the  Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).







The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.