The Effect of Chelating Agents on the Use of Produced Water in Crosslinked-Gel-Based Hydraulic Fracturing
- Ahmed M. Elsarawy (Texas A&M University) | Hisham A. Nasr-El-Din (Texas A&M University) | Kay E. Cawiezel (BP America)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Low Perm Symposium, 5-6 May, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2016. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2 Well completion, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 1.8 Formation Damage, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4.3.4 Scale, 3.2.6 Produced Water Management, 3.2 Well Operations, Optimization and Stimulation
- hydraulic fracturing, produced water, Reuse, fracturing fluid
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 149 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
Hydraulic fracturing operations require large amount of water which, in some cases, could reach six million gallons per treatment. Fresh water, from surface and subsurface sources, is usually used to formulate the fracturing fluid. The use of produced water in hydraulic fracturing has gained increased attention in the last few years, as it would solve fresh water acquisition challenges and reduces its disposal costs. However, produced water usually contains high amounts of total dissolved solids (TDS) that prevents its compatibility with fracturing fluid additives and negatively affects the fracturing fluid rheology. This paper investigates the effect of different chelating agents on the use of high-TDS produced water in high pH borate-crosslinked gels used in hydraulic fracturing fluids.
Samples of field-produced water were analyzed for different ion concentrations. Synthetic water was prepared with different amounts of Na, K, Ca, and Mg salts. The fracturing fluid was formulated using natural guar polymer, borate-based crosslinker, biocide, surfactant, clay controller, scale inhibitor, and pH buffer. Five chelating agents tested in this study included HEDTA, GLDA, di-sodium EDTA, di-ammonium EDTA, and sodium gluconate. Compatibility tests of the fluid system at 180ºF were conducted at different ion concentrations. Apparent viscosity of the fracturing fluid was measured using a high-pressure high-temperature rotational rheometer. All rheology tests were conducted at a temperature of 180ºF and were conducted according to API 13m procedure with a three-hour test duration.
Results indicated the potentiality of high-TDS water to cause precipitate and, hence, formation damage. However, the use of chelating agents has reduced the precipitation of divalent cations and enabled the formulation of fracturing fluid at higher Ca and Mg concentrations. The use of 2.5 wt% of HEDTA has enabled the formulation of the fracturing fluid using synthetic produced water that contains TDS of 101,000 ppm with Ca and Mg concentrations of 2,500 and 200 ppm, respectively. The fracturing fluid showed an average viscosity of 150 cp at 100 s-1 despite the high-TDS and high-hardness environment. The use of GLDA reduced the Ca and Mg ion precipitation; however, its chelation effect was found to be limited to certain concentrations. Some chelating agents showed the ability to chelate the boron ion and/or reduce the system's pH value. Consequently, viscosity measurements indicated the breaking of the fluid viscosity after the addition of the chelating agent.
This paper presents the use of chelating agents to maximize the effectiveness of produced water for hydraulic fracturing operations. Successful use of chelating agents would reduce produced water disposal costs and improve the environment by reducing the consumption of fresh water.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||14|
Al-Muntasheri, G.A. 2014. A Critical Review of Hydraulic-Fracturing Fluids for Moderate- to Ultralow-Permeability Formations over the Last Decade. SPE Production & Operations. 29 (04): 243–260. SPE-169552-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/169552-PA
Haghshenaz, A. and Nasr-El-Din, H. A. 2014. Effect of Dissolved Solids on Reuse of Produced Water at High Temperature in Hydraulic Fracturing Jobs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 21: 316–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.08.013.
Huang, F., Gundewar, R., Steed, D., et al. 2005. Feasibility of Using Produced Water for Crosslinked Gel-Based Hydraulic Fracturing. Presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 16-19 April. SPE-94320-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/94320-MS.
Kakadjian, S., Thompson, J.E., Torres, R.et al. 2013. Stable Fracturing Fluids from Produced Waste Water. Presented at the SPE Kuwait Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Kuwait City, Kuwait, 8-10 October. SPE-167275-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/167275-MS.
LeBas, R., Lord, P., Luna, D.et al. 2013. Development and Use of High-TDS Recycled Produced Water for Crosslinked-Gel-Based Hydraulic Fracturing. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 4-6 February. SPE-163824-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/163824-MS.
Li, L., Eliseeva, K., Eliseev, V.et al. 2009. Well Treatment Fluids Prepared with Oilfield Produced Water. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 4-7 October. SPE-124212-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/124212-MS.
Means, J.L., Kucak, T., and Crerar, D.A. 2003. Relative Degradation Rates of NTA, EDTA and DTPA and Environmental Implications. Environmental Pollution Series B, Chemical and Physical1 (1): 45–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0143-148x(80)90020-8
Sun, H., Li, L., Mayor, J.et al. 2015. Study on Abnormal Viscosity Development in High-TDS Produced Water. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 13-15 April. SPE-173784-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/173784-MS.
Taylor, K.C. and Nasr-El-Din, H.A. 1999. A systematic study of iron control chemicals-part 2. Paper SPE 50772 presented at the International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, Texas, 16-19 February. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/50772-MS.
US Department of Energy (DOE), Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Premier, April 2009. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/03/f0/ShaleGasPrimer_Online_4-2009.pdf