Polymer-Enhanced Foams for Water Profile Control
- L. Hernando (Université de Bordeaux) | H. J. Bertin (Université de Bordeaux) | A. Omari (Université de Bordeaux) | G. Dupuis (Poweltec, Rueil-Malmaison) | A. Zaitoun (Poweltec, Rueil-Malmaison)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, 11-13 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2016. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 2 Well completion, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 1.6.10 Coring, Fishing, 1.6 Drilling Operations
- conformance, polymer, foam
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 491 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
Foam injection has been proven to be an efficient technique for EOR applications, stimulation operations and profile control. However, foam is known to have low stability and poor oil tolerance but adding polymer is reported to be an efficient way to improve such foam stability. An extensive study has been undertaken with different surfactants (foaming agents) and polymers to screen out the surfactant/polymer combinations providing the highest foam stability.
We performed a systematic study consisting of static tests (foamability, stability) from which we selected two surfactants (nonionic and anionic) and two polymers (nonionic and associative polymer) expected to highly improve foam performances. Core-flood experiments were performed in high-permeability sandpacks in successive sequences starting with foam propagation, followed by a water flow and then an oil backflow. The Resistance Factor (RF) has been measured for each flow sequence.
Based on our experiments, polymer-enhanced foams is shown to be a promising way for profile control during waterflood and recommendation of use of an associative polymer instead of a classical nonionic polymer is discussed.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Friedmann, F., Hughes, T. L., Smith, M. E., Hild, G. P., Wilson, A., & Davies, S. N. Development and Testing of a Foam-Gel Technology to Improve Conformance of the Rangely CO2 Flood. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/54429-PA, 1999.
Hiraski G. J. The Steam-Foam Process. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/19505-PA, 1989.
Shen, C., Nguyen, Q. P., Huh, C., & Rossen, W. R. Does Polymer Stabilize Foam in Porous Media? Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/99796-MS, 2006.
Tang, G. and Kovscek, A.R. Trapped Gas Fraction During Steady-State Foam Flow. Transport in Porous Media 65 (2): 287–307. doi:10.1007/s11242-005-6093-4, 2006.
Telmadarreie, A., & Trivedi, J. New Insight on Carbonate Heavy Oil Recovery: Pore Scale Mechanisms of Solvent Alternating CO2 Foam/Polymer Enhanced Foam Flooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/174510-MS, 2015.