Management of Steam Flashing in SAGD Completion Design via the Implementation of Flow Control Devices
- Sudiptya Banerjee (Texas A&M Univ.) | Berna Hascakir (Texas A&M Univ.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Thermal Well Integrity and Design Symposium, 23-25 November, Banff, Alberta, Canada
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2015. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 4.2.3 Materials and Corrosion, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, 7 Management and Information
- steam flashing, flashing erosion, SAGD, Flow Control Devices
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 315 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
The integrity of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) wells are often threatened by the very steam that provides the process its name. High rate steam production, or the adiabatic flashing of steam condensate to a vapor state, often creates an environment of "flashing erosion", erosive damage created by the water-cutting effect of high velocity wet steam or the corrosive elements (e.g., carbonic acid) that can be associated with low temperature condensate. Condensate flashing to steam also carries additional risk from "cavitation erosion", erosion of completion equipment that occurs from the sudden shock wave impacts caused by the implosion of small liquid-free zones with the condensate, similar to the well- understood water hammer effect. Conventionally, to prevent the production of live steam or the flashing of steam condensate, operators have relied upon choking production rates based upon monitored temperature differences between injected and produced fluids. However, this methodology based on subcool carries its own risks and undermines the economic viability of SAGD projects. Another approach is to improve conformance of steam injection and fluid production by installing inflow/injection control devices (ICDs) in either, or both, the SAGD injector and producer. If properly designed, these devices in the producer can equalize heel-to-toe influx of bitumen emulsion, provide greater control of the sub-cool, and behave as an autonomous (or self-regulating) valve. This presentation will focus upon this last design objective. By coupling published performance equations for various ICD designs with steam behavior equations, competing designs will be evaluated for their likelihood of steam flashing within a SAGD completion and their respective ability to control flashed steam prior to the steam creating damage in the completion. Further, the discussion will examine possible future avenues of research, such as ICD designs with a steam throttle effect driven through a velocity-sensitive choking of steam production.
|File Size||309 KB||Number of Pages||13|
Banerjee, S., Jobling, R., Abdelfattah, T. A., & Nguyen, H. T. (2013, September 30). The Role of Autonomous Flow Control in SAGD Well Design. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/166266-MS
Carpenter, C. (2014, March 1). The Role of Autonomous Flow Control in SAGD Well Design. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/0314-0136-JPT
Chien, S.-F. 1990. Critical Flow of Wet Steam through Chokes. J Pet Technol 42 (03): 363–370. SPE-17575-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/17575-PA.
Edmunds, N., & Gittins, S. D. (1993, June 1). Effective Application of Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage of Bitumen to Long Horizontal Well Pairs. Petroleum Society of Canada. doi:10.2118/93-06-05
Garcia, L., Coronado, M. P., Russell, R. D., Garcia, G. A., & Peterson, E. R. (2009, January 1). The First Passive Inflow Control Device That Maximizes Productivity During Every Phase of a Wells Life. International Petroleum Technology Conference. doi:10.2523/IPTC-13863-MS
Jain, R., Syal, S., Long, T. A., Wattenbarger, R. C., & Kosik, I. J. (2013, April 3). An Integrated Approach To Design Completions for Horizontal Wells for Unconventional Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/147120-PA
Lauritzen, J. E., & Martiniussen, I. B. (2011, January 1). Single and Multi-phase Flow Loop Testing Results for Industry Standard Inflow Control Devices. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/146347-MS
Matthews, C. (2014, March 1). Technology Focus: Heavy Oil (March 2014). Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/0314-0128-JPT
Morrison, G.L. 2003. Euler Number Based Orifice Discharge Coefficient Relationship. J. Fluids Eng. 125 (1): 189–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/m521955.
National Energy Board. 2014. Canadian Energy Dynamics: Review of 2014. February 2015, http://www.neb-one.gc.ca/nrg/ntgrtd/mrkt/dnmc/2014/2014nrgdnmc-eng.pdf (accessed 11 June 2015.
Peterson, E. R., Coronado, M. P., Garcia, L., & Garcia, G. A. (2010, January 1). Well Completion Applications for the Latest-Generation Low-Viscosity-Sensitive Passive Inflow-Control Device. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/128481-MS.