Better Decision Making in an Ever More Complex World
- Jill Sweatman (Sweatman Consultancy Pty. Ltd.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, 9-12 November, Abu Dhabi, UAE
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2015. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 7 Management and Information
- thinking, decision, interruption, question, performance
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 71 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
The oil and gas industry has the opportunity to guide its collective intellects in innovative practices that grow sustainable industries. Thinking differently can further contribute to world economies and communities.
This paper is intended to stimulate debate, raise some intriguing questions and encourage in each of us the willingness to do and see things a little differently. Three key areas are discussed in the context of making better decisions in an ever more complex world:
Why we need to ask the right questions
Why we need to discipline distractions
Why we need to create a conducive environment for decision making.
The result of multitasking, heavy multimedia usage and our world of ubiquitous distractions is having a negative impact on thinking. It takes effort to make the time to think deeply and to discipline our distractions. It is at our peril that we ignore the evidence and merely accept the velocity of our professional worlds and demanding lifestyles.
The complex and the ambiguous abound in the petroleum industry. These elements dictate a depth of thinking and intellectual dexterity that can inspire creativity and capitalize on technology. Research shows that despite sophisticated technology, the human brain remains pivotal in interpreting the practical and the nuanced. The field of neuroscience proves taking care of our most important asset, our brain, is imperative to being more effective in decision making. There are some simple actions we can all take, like walking briskly, that will improve judgment and outcomes.
Our brain may be changing due to the constant use of technology and the distractions it provides. Studies show workers are interrupted every 11 minutes, they self-interrupt 44% of the time and handle interruptions immediately 73% of the time. Such disruptions come at a high cost to ourselves and our business, especially when risk mitigation is compromised. Choosing how and when to be interrupted is necessary if we are working on an important task so that mistakes can be mitigated. We are immersed in an environment that is data-rich yet attention-impoverished. We need to be judicious about the interruptions we allow and how we deal with them. Aspects are explored with recommendations for daily practice that will improve decision making.
|File Size||660 KB||Number of Pages||14|
Belsky, S. 2012. What Happened to Downtime?: The Extinction of Deep Thinking & Sacred Space. 99U.http://99u.com/articles/6947/what-happened-to-downtime-the-extinction-of-deep-thinking-sacred-space (accessed 30 August 2015).
Branson, R. 2015. Why You Should Stand up in Meetings. Virgin, 6 April 2015, http://www.virgin.com/richard-branson/why-you-should-stand-up-in-meetings. (accessed 4 September 2015)
Coelho, P. 2007. The Lesson of the Butterfly. 10 December 2007. http://paulocoelhoblog.com/?s=butterfly+story (accessed 1 August 2015).
Flavell, J. 1979. Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive–Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist34(10): 906–911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Foroughi, C.K., Werner, N.E., BarragÁn, D.. (2015). Interruptions Disrupt Reading Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144(3): 704–709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000074
Foroughi, C.K., Werner, N.E., Nelson, N.. (2014). Do Interruptions Affect Quality of Work. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society November 201456(7): 1262–1271 Advance online publication April 22, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720814531786
Gomex-Pinilla, F., and Hillman, C. (2013). The Influence of Exercise on Cognitive Abilities. Comprehensive Physiology, 3(1), 403–428. http://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c110063
Jonas, P., and Lisman, J. (2014). Structure, Function, and Plasticity of Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus Microcircuits. Front. Neural Circuits 8: 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2014.00107
Mark, G., Gonzales, V., and Harris, J. 2005. No task left behind?: Examining the Nature of Fragmented Work. Proceedings of the SIGCHI (CHI'05) Presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon, 2–7 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055017
Mark, G., Hausstein, D., and Kloecke, U. 2008. The Cost of Interrupted Work: More Speed and Stress. Presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'08), Florence, Italy, 5–10 April, ACM Press, 107–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357072
Morgentaler, A., and Conners, W.P. 2015. Testosterone Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer: Literature Review, Clinical Experience, and Recommendations. Asian Journal of Andrology[serial online] 2015, 17(2): 206–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.148067
Ophir, E., Nass, C., and Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive Control in Media Multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37):15583–15587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
Redelmeier, Donald, M.D., and Tibshirani, Robert, PhD. 1997. Association between Cellular-Telephone Calls and Motor Vehicle Collisions. The New England Journal of Medicine. 336: 453–458. February 13, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199702133360701
Rosen, L., Carrier, M., and Cheever, N. 2013. Facebook and Texting Made Me Do It: Media-Induced Task Switching While Studying. Computers in Human Behaviour 29(3): 948–958. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.001
Stothart, C., Mitchum, A., and Yehnert, C. 2015. The Attentional Cost of Receiving a Cell Phone Notification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 41(4): 893–897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000100
Strayer, D.L, Cooper, J.M., and Drews, F.A. 2004. What Do Drivers Fail to See When Conversing on a Cell Phone?. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting September 200448(19): 2213–2217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120404801902
Strayer, D., Drews, F.A., and Crouch, D.J. 2006. A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver. The Journal of the Society of Human Factors and Ergonomics 48(2): 381–391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872006777724471
Sullivan, B. 2013. Students Can't Resist Distraction for Two Minutes … And Neither Can You. NBC News, 18 May 2013, http://redtape.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/18/18322435-students-cant-resist-distraction-for-two-minutes-and-neither-can-you?lite (accessed 1 September 2015).
Van Praag, H., Kempermann, G, and Gage, F. 1999. Running Increases Call Proliferation and Neurogenesis in the Adult Mouse Dentate Gyrus. Nature Neuroscience 2: 266–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/6368