Advanced Modeling of Interwell Fracturing Interference: an Eagle Ford Shale Oil Study
- Matteo Marongiu-Porcu (Schlumberger) | Donald Lee (Schlumberger) | Dan Shan (Schlumberger) | Adrian Morales (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 28-30 September, Houston, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2015. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 0.2.2 Geomechanics, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.6 Formation Evaluation & Management, 2 Well completion, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 0.2 Wellbore Design, 5.8.4 Shale Oil, 2.5 Hydraulic Fracturing
- Fracture Hit, stress azimuth rotation, development strategies, Shale Oil Fracturing, Well Interference
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 1,275 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
To investigate interwell interference in shale plays, a state-of-the-art modeling workflow was applied to a synthetic case based on known Eagle Ford shale geophysics and completion/development practices. A multidisciplinary approach was successfully rationalized and implemented to capture 3D formation properties, hydraulic fracture propagation and interaction with a discrete fracture network (DFN), reservoir production/depletion, and evolution of magnitude and azimuth of in-situ stresses using a 3D finite-element model.
The integrated workflow begins with a geocellular model constructed using 3D seismic data, publicly available stratigraphic correlations from offset vertical pilot wells, and openhole well log data. The 3D seismic data were also used to characterize the spatial variability of natural fracture intensity and orientation to build the DFN model. A recently developed complex fracture model was used to simulate the hydraulic fracture network created with typical Eagle Ford pumping schedules. The initial production/depletion of the primary well was simulated using a state-of-the-art unstructured-grid reservoir simulator and known Eagle Ford shale pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) data, relative permeability curves, and pressure-dependent fracture conductivity. The simulated 3D reservoir pressure field was then imported into a geomechanical finite-element model to determine the spatial/temporal evolution of magnitude and azimuth of the in-situ stresses.
Importing the simulated pressure field into the geomechanical model proved to be a critical step that revealed a significant coupling between the simulated depletion caused by the primary well and the morphology of the simulated fractures within the adjacent infill well. The modeling workflow can be used to assess the effect of interwell interferences that may occur in a shale field development, such as fracture hits on adjacent wells, sudden productivity losses, and drastic pressure/rate declines. The workflow addresses the complex challenges in field-scale development of shale prospects, including infilling and refracturing programs.
The fundamental importance of this work is the ability to model pressure depletion and associated stress properties with respect to time (time between production of the primary well and fracturing of the infill well). The complex interaction between stress reduction, stress anisotropy, and stress reorientation with the DFN will determine if newly created fractures propagate toward the parent well or deflect away. The technique should be implemented in general development strategies, including the optimization of infilling and refracturing programs, child well lateral spacing, and control of fracture propagation to minimize undesired fracture hits or other interferences.
|File Size||12 MB||Number of Pages||24|
Berard, T., Desroches, J., Yang, Y., Weng, X., and Olson, K. E. 2015. High-Resolution 3D Structural Geomechanics Modeling for Hydraulic Fracturing. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 3–5 February. SPE-173362-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/173362-MS.
Cipolla, C. L., Fitzpatrick, T., Williams, M. J., and Ganguly, U. 2011a. Seismic-to-Simulation for Unconventional Reservoir Development. Presented at the SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 9–11 October. SPE-146876-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/146876-MS.
Cipolla, C. L., Warpinski, N. R., Mayerhofer, M., Lolon, E. P., and Vincent, M. 2010. The Relationship Between Fracture Complexity, Reservoir Properties, and Fracture-Treatment Design. SPE Production and Operations Journal (Vol. 25), n. 4, pp. 438–452. SPE-115769-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/115769-PA.
Cipolla, C. L., Weng, X., Mack, M., Ganguly, U., Gu, H., Kresse, O., and Cohen, C. 2011b. Integrating Microseismic Mapping and Complex Fracture Modeling to Characterize Fracture Complexity. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 24–26 January. SPE-140185-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/140185-MS.
Ejofodomi, E., Baihly, J. D., Malpani, R., Altman, R. M., Huchton, T. J., Welch, D., and Zieche, J. 2011. Integrating All Available Data To Improve Production in the Marcellus Shale. Presented at the SPE North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 14–16 June. SPE-144321-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/144321-MS.
Elbel, J. L. and Mack, M. G. 1993. Refracturing: Observations and Theories. Presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 21–23 March. SPE-25464-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/25464-MS.
Gomez, M. G., Sanguinetti, M., Rebay, G., and Robles, F. 2015. Predictability, Distribution and Characteristics of the Unconventional Resources in Latin America. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Quito, Ecuador, 18–20 November. SPE-177133-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/177133-MS.
Gupta, J., Zielonka, M., Albert, R. A., El-Rabaa, A. M., Burnham, H. A., and Choi, N. H. 2012. Integrated Methodology for Optimizing Development of Unconventional Gas Resources. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 6–8 February. SPE-152224-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/152224-MS.
HIS Energy, US well database, https://www.ihs.com
Jochen, V. A., Malpani, R., Moncada, K., Indriati, S., Altman, R. M., Luo, F., and Xu, J. 2011. Production Data Analysis: Unraveling Reservoir Quality and Completion Quality. Presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, 15–17 November. SPE-147535-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/147535-MS.
Kanneganti, K. T., Oussoltsev, D., Grant, D., Ball, N., and Offenberger, R. M. 2013. Application of Reservoir-Centric Stimulation Design Tool in Completion Optimization for Eagle Ford Shale. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 10–12 April. SPE-164526-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/164526-MS.
Liu, H., Luo, Y., Zhang, N., Yang, D., Dong, W., Qi, D., Gao, Y. 2013. Unlock Shale Oil Reserves Using Advanced Fracturing Techniques: A Case Study in China. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, China, 26–28 March. IPTC-16522-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10..2118/
Martinez, R., Rosinski, J., and Dreher, D. T. 2012. Horizontal Pressure Sink Mitigation Completion Design: A Case Study in the Haynesville Shale. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–10 October. SPE-159089-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/159089-MS.
Maxwell, S. C., Weng, X., Kresse, O., and Rutledge, J. 2013. Modeling Microseismic Hydraulic Fracture Deformation. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166312-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/166312-MS.
Mayerhofer, M. J., Lolon, E. P., Youngblood, J. E., and Heinze, J. R. 2006. Integration of Microseismic-Fracture-Mapping Results with Numerical Fracture Network Production Modeling in the Barnett Shale. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24–27 September. SPE-102103-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/102103-MS.
Offenberger, R., Ball, N., Kanneganti, K., and Oussoltsev, D. 2013. Integration of Natural and Hydraulic Fracture Network Modeling with Reservoir Simulation for an Eagle Ford Well. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, 12–14 August. SPE-168683-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/168683-MS.
Railroad Commission of Texas, http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/
Roussel, N. P. and Sharma, M. M. 2010. Quantifying Transient Effects in Altered-Stress Refracturing of Vertical Wells. SPE Journal (Vol. 15), n. 3, pp. 770–782. SPE-119522-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/SPE-119522-PA.
Roussel, N. P. and Sharma, M. M. 2012. Role of Stress Reorientation in the Success of Refracture Treatments in Tight Gas Sands. SPE Production and Operations Journal (Vol. 27), n. 4, pp. 346–355. SPE-134491-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/134491-PA.
Siebrits, E., Elbel, J. L., Detournay, E., Detournay-Piette, C., Christianson, M., Robinson, B. M., and Diyashev, I. R. 1998. Parameters Affecting Azimuth and Length of a Secondary Fracture During a Refracture Treatment. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 27–30 September. SPE-48928-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/48928-MS.
Singh, V., Roussel, N. P., and Sharma, M. M. 2008. Stress Reorientation and Fracture Treatments in Horizontal Wells. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 21–24 September. SPE-116092-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/116092-MS.
Song, B., and Ehlig-Economides, C. A. 2011. Rate-Normalized Pressure Analysis for Determination of Shale Gas Well Performance. Presented at the North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 14–16 June. SPE-144031-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/144031-MS.
Veeken, C., Wahleitner, L., and Keedy, C. 1994. Experimental Modelling of Casing Deformation in a Compacting Reservoir. Presented at the Eurock SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering Conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 29–31 August. SPE-28090-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28090-MS.
Vincent, M. C. 2009. Examining Our Assumptions - Have Oversimplifications Jeopardized Our Ability to Design Optimal Fracture Treatments? Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 19–21 January. SPE-119143-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/119143-MS.
Wei, P., Ehlig-Economides, C. A., Juan, D., Ying, H., and Song, B. 2014. Intelligent Rate Transient Analysis for Forecasting Behavior of Shale Gas Wells. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, 25–27 August. URTEC-1921855-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2014-/1921855.
Wright, C. A., Conant, R. A., Stewart, D. W., and Byerly, P. M. 1994. Reorientation of Propped Refracture Treatments. Presented at the Eurock SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics in Petroleum Engineering Conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 29–31 August. SPE-28078-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/28078-MS.
Zhai, Z. and Sharma, M. M. 2007. Estimating Fracture Reorientation due to Long Term Fluid Injection / Production. Presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, March 31–April 3. SPE-106387-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/106387-MS.