Modelling of Non-Condensable gas Injection In SAGD Process - Important Mechanisms And Their Impact On Field Scale Simulation Models
- Hossein Nourozieh (Computer Modeling Group Ltd.) | Ehsan Ranjbar (Computer Modeling Group Ltd.) | Anjani Kumar (Computer Modeling Group Ltd.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, 9-11 June, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2015. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.2 Fluid Characterization, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery
- Simulation Model, Non-condensable Gas, Field Scale, Bitumen, SAGD
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 562 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Field-scale simulation of non-condensable gas injection in a hybrid SAGD process for the heavy oil and bitumen reservoirs requires a comprehensive numerical model that considers different mechanisms involved in the processes. The complexity of modelling such processes is due to the interrelation of oil-gas phase behavior and fluid transport mechanisms such as advection, dispersion, and dissolution. The non-condensable gas in the vapour phase is transported into the reservoir by the advection process which is dominantly controlled by the rock-fluid interaction parameters.
The steam and non-condensable fluid in the gaseous phase may have different relative permeability and end-point saturations associated with their interaction with oil/liquid. The diffusion and dispersion of non-condensable gas control how it spreads within a phase and its dissolution into oil and water determines its transfer across phases. Although, it is still debated that non-condensable gas accumulates at the steam front reducing heat transfer into the oil phase and lowering oil production rate, some field production data show contrary results. That is, the co-injection of non-condensable gas with steam does not affect the oil production rate while it reduces the steam-oil ratio. The non-condensable gas may accumulate at the top of the reservoir providing an insulation effect, reducing heat losses to the overburden and increasing the thermal efficiency of steam.
This study attempts to provide insights about field scale simulation of non-condensable gas injection in the hybrid SAGD process with a comprehensive numerical simulation model. Analysis will be presented regarding important mechanisms that should be considered, their impact on the process, and techniques to model them. Some of the important mechanisms that will be discussed are diffusion and dispersion, and solubility of gas in bitumen and water. The intent is to identify factors important to the modeling of these processes at field scale and how robust simulation models can be developed to replicate observed field behaviour.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||15|
Cenovus Energy (2012a), Christina Lake In-situ Oil Scheme (Approval No. 8591) 2011-2012 Update to the ERCB, June 20, 2012, 302 pp. http://www.ercb.ca/data-and-publications/activity-and-data/insitu-progress, FINAL Cenovus Christina 8591 RMR 2012 – Subsurface.pdf
Cenovus Energy (2012b), Foster Creek In-situ Oil Scheme (Approval No. 8623) 2011-2012 Update to the ERCB, May 24, 2012, 386 pp. http://www.ercb.ca/data-and-publications/activity-and-data/insitu-progress, Final Cenovus Foster Creek Subsurface.pdf;
Suncor Energy Inc. (2012), Suncor Firebag 2012 ERCB Performance Presentation, Commercial Scheme Approval No. 8870, May 15-16, 2012, 342 pp. http://www.ercb.ca/data-and-publications/activity-and-data/insitu-progress, FINAL Suncor Firebag Project 8870 – 2012 Directive 054 – Annual Performance Presentation.pdf