Full Pressure Coupling for Geo-mechanical Multi-phase Multi-component Flow Simulations
- Florian Doster (Inst. of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, UK) | Jan Martin Nordbotten (Dep. of Mathematics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 23-25 February, Houston, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2015. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.2.2 Geomechanics
- multi-phase flow, geo-mechanics, multi-component flow, finite volume
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 245 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
Simulation of coupled flow and geomechanics is of rising importance as unconventional subsurface exploration pushes the operational envelope of geological media. However, coupled simulations remain challenging since the different physics and the different mathematical structure of the corresponding equations favor different discretization techniques. Therefore common and established software packages are tailored to either flow or geo-mechanical simulations, while the fluid-mechanical problem is addressed through various coupling schemes.
Coupling schemes are commonly assigned to three categories (e.g. (Settari & Walters, 2001)): Decoupled, iteratively coupled and fully coupled schemes. Stability and accuracy as well as implementation effort increase from decoupled to fully coupled schemes. Despite disadvantages, decoupled and iteratively coupled schemes are preferred in practice because they allow for using established software packages (see e.g. (Pettersen, 2012)).
Here, we focus on iterative coupling and propose a new coupling scheme: Full pressure coupling. In contrast to established iterative schemes we solve the geo-mechanics fully coupled to a single-phase flow problem using global pressure, and iteratively couple the resulting deformation to a multi-phase multi-component flow solver. As most geo-mechanic simulators include fully coupled single-phase flow solvers, this does not require any new software development. The splitting scheme requires solving the pressure field twice. However, since solving the deformation equations and the non-linear flow equations represent the majority of the computational cost, we expect the overhead per iteration step to be small, and justified if the number of iterations can be reduced.
To illustrate the full pressure coupling scheme we present a finite volume Implicit Pressure and Deformation Explicit Masses (ImPDEM) scheme that builds on a finite volume discretization for geo-mechanics and single-phase flow (Jan Martin Nordbotten, 2014b) and a robust finite volume Implicit Pressure Explicit Masses (ImPEM) method for multi-phase multi-component flow (Doster, Keilegavlen, & Nordbotten, 2013). For this time-stepping scheme the coupling is exact and the iterative scheme converges in one iteration, even for nonlinear flow and nonlinear geo-mechanics. The finite volume discretization of stress and strain further enables a seamless integration of geo-mechanical phenomena into existing ImPEM solvers. Advanced transport and thermodynamic solvers hence can be applied without additional modifications. We illustrate our new coupling scheme through numerical examples for test problems related to geological carbon storage.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||12|
Bažant, Z. P., Salviato, M., Chau, V. T., Visnawathan, H., & Zubelewicz, A. (2014). Why Fracking Works. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 81(10), 101010. doi: 10.1115/1.4028192
Doster, F., Keilegavlen, E., & Nordbotten, J. M. (2013). A Robust Implicit Pressure Explicit Mass Method for Multi-Phase Multi-Component Flow Including Capillary Pressure And Buoyancy. In R. Al-Khoury & J. Bundschuh (Eds.), Computational Models for CO2 Geo-sequestration & Compressed Air Energy Storage. Taylor & Francis Group/CRC Press.
Kim, J., Tchelepi, H. a., & Juanes, R. (2011b). Stability and convergence of sequential methods for coupled flow and geomechanics: Fixed-stress and fixed-strain splits. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 200(13-16), 1591–1606. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.022
Mikelic, A., Wang, B., & Wheeler, M. F. (2014). Numerical convergence study of iterative coupling for coupled flow and geomechanics. Computational Geosciences, 18(3-4), 325–341. doi: 10.1007/s10596-013-9393-8
Nordbotten, J. M. (2014a). Cell-centered finite volume discretizations for deformable porous media. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 100(6), 399–418. doi: 10.1002/nme.4734
Nordbotten, J. M. (2014b). Finite-volume hydro-mechanical simulation in porous media. Water Resources Research, 50(5), 4379–4394. doi: 10.1002/2013WR015179
Pettersen, Ø. (2012). Coupled Flow- and Rock Mechanics Simulation: Optimizing the coupling term for faster and accurate computation. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and …, 9(3), 628–643. Retrieved from http://folk.uib.no/fciop/index_htm_files/Injam_OP_2012-03-08.pdf
Prevost, J. H. (2013). One-Way versus Two-Way Coupling in Reservoir-Geomechanical Models. Poromechanics V, only the a, 517–526. doi: 10.1061/9780784412992.061
Rutqvist, J. (2012). The Geomechanics of CO2 Storage in Deep Sedimentary Formations. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 30(3), 525–551. doi: 10.1007/s10706-011-9491-0
Schlumberger. (n.d.-a). ECLIPSE Industry Reference Reservoir Simulator. Retrieved from http://www.software.slb.com/products/foundation/Pages/eclipse.aspx
Schlumberger. (n.d.-b). VISAGE Finite-Element Geomechanics Simulator. Retrieved from http://www.software.slb.com/products/foundation/Pages/visage.aspx
Settari, A., & Walters, D. A. (2001). Advances in coupled geomechanical and reservoir modeling with applications to reservoir compaction. Spe Journal, (March), 14–17. Retrieved from https://www.onepetro.org/journal-paper/SPE-74142-PA
Wallis, J. R., Kendall, R. P., & Little, T. E. (2013). Constrained Residual Acceleration of Conjugate Residual Methods. In SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 10.2118/13536-MS