Evaluation of Four Thermal Recovery Methods for Bitumen Extraction
- A. Mukhametshina (Texas A&M University) | A.W. Morrow (Texas A&M University) | D. Aleksandrov (Gubkin Russian State University of Oil & Gas) | B. Hascakir (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Meeting, 17-18 April, Denver, Colorado
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2014. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.10 Microbial Methods, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 5.4 Enhanced Recovery, 7.4.3 Market analysis /supply and demand forecasting/pricing, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 5.1.8 Seismic Modelling, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal
- In-Situ Combustion (ISC), Bitumen extraction, Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD), Hot Water Injection (HWI), Steam Flooding (SF)
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 497 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Around 70% of the world’s bitumen resources are deposited in Western Alberta. Surface mining is applicable only to 20% of the total reserves, and in-situ cold production can only be effective to recover the 5% of the initial bitumen in place. This low extraction yield mainly stems from the high viscosities of bitumen, which can be reduced dramatically with the application of thermal recovery. However, economically viable and technically feasible bitumen extraction with thermal methods is challenging. There are also a range of adverse environmental issues associated with thermal methods. As conventional resources decline and since conventional recovery methods are insufficient to extract unconventional reserves effectively, it is necessary to address these issues associated with thermal recovery methods.
In this study, we evaluated the recovery characteristics of a Canadian bitumen (7.5 °API-53,000 cp, at 21 °C) with four thermal recovery methods. A two-dimensional physical model was used to evaluate the performances of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) and Hot Water Injection (HWI) with SAGD well configuration. Steam Flooding (SF) and In-Situ Combustion (ISC) experiments were performed with two separate one-dimensional experimental set-ups. Experimental conditions were maintained identical at reservoir average conditions. The effluent gas composition, temperature profiles, oil recovery, behavior of fluid (oil, water, steam, and gas) front movements, and the level of oil upgrading were discussed by considering the environmental and economic constrains of the processes. Furthermore, core samples were extracted from the model to evaluate and visualize the sweep efficiency.
Experimental findings reveal that ISC yielded the highest (~90 wt%) and HWI the lowest (~33 wt%) oil recoveries. In terms of environmental footprints, SF produced the highest amount of gases per barrel oil production, and HWI resulted in the lowest gas production. Among HWI, SAGD, and SF, energy consumption was the greatest in SAGD and the worst sweep efficiency was obtained with SF.
Our results recommend a hybrid utilization of thermal recovery methods, specifically HWI with ISC for the extraction of this bitumen. HWI prepares the reservoir for ISC by aiding to increase reservoir temperature and reducing the reservoir heterogeneities with hot water distribution.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||11|