Comparative Study of Open Hole and Cemented Multistage Vertical Completion Technologies in the Permian Basin
- Darrell Stephen Lohoefer (Eagle Oil & Gas Co.) | Saiff Ezeldin (Packers Plus Energy Services Inc) | Brett Keener (Eagle Oil & Gas Co.) | Daniel Snyder (Packers Plus Energy Services Inc)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition-Asia Pacific, 11-13 November, Brisbane, Australia
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2013, Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.14 Casing and Cementing, 1.10.1 Drill string components and drilling tools (tubulars, jars, subs, stabilisers, reamers, etc), 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 2.2.2 Perforating, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.6.5 Tracers, 2.5.4 Multistage Fracturing, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant)
- Comparative Study, Completion Technologies, Cost differences, Production Results
- 16 in the last 30 days
- 472 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
The Permian Basin is one of the top five resource plays in the United States and consists of a number of stacked pay zones. Two of these formations, the Wolfcamp shale and Bone Spring (Wolfbone), together deliver a pay zone thickness of 1,000 to 1,500 ft. They are made up of several different layers of organic rich shales intermingled with sandstone and siltstone. Horizontal completions in the shales are just beginning and have yet to be proven; however, operators are successfully exploiting the reserves through vertical wells.
While a mature exploration area, the completion of the thick shale intervals is a new target formation. To date, two vertical completion methods have been utilized to gain access to hydrocarbons: open hole multistage (OHMS) fracturing systems and the conventional cemented liner, "plug and perf?? (CLPP) method. This paper compares 30-, 60-, 90-, and 180-day production results from 12 vertical wells in Reeves County, Texas completed with OHMS systems and 33 offset wells completed with the CLPP method. The system details, fracture methods used, as well as the cost and operational differences are discussed.
By comparing these two methods, this paper highlights OHMS as a long-term solution for operators completing vertical wells in stacked pay. The production, operation and cost comparisons of the two completion methods will provide theoretical and practical arguments to assist in designing a completion. The results of this study contribute to the technical conversation of how to economically produce a vertical well.
The Permian system consists of three basins: Delaware Basin, Central Basin Platform, and Midland Basin (Fig. 1). The Permian Basin is an unconventional trend comprising a mix of fine sandstone and siltstone interbedded with various shale and carbonate layers. Early production targets in the Permian Basin were shallow formations on the basin edges to deeper deposits in the central Delaware (Avalon, Bone Spring, and Wolfcamp formations). The Delaware Basin encompasses three zones of the Bone Spring formation as well as the Wolfcamp shale below (Fig. 2). Since 2009, this play has been developed with vertical wells commingling the oil resource from the Third Bone Spring and Wolfcamp formations with conventional reservoirs.
Wolfcamp Formation. The Wolfcamp is a shale formation that extends throughout the Permian basin and has the ideal mineralogy and grain-size distribution to behave as both a source rock and a reservoir, which is now estimated to contain 3 billion bbl of oil (Beckwith, 2013). The Wolfcamp was deposited in a marine environment with productive targets consisting of sandstones, siltstones, shales, and limestones. While there are pockets of high porosity and permeability in the trend, the majority of the reservoir interval is of lower quality with porosity and permeability ranges of 5 - 8% and 0.001 - 1.0 mD (Fairhurst and Hanson, 2012), respectively with 2 - 5% total organic content (TOC).
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||10|