Predictive Analytics: Development and Deployment of Upstream Data Driven Models
- Keith Richard Holdaway (SAS Institute Inc.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 16-18 April, Mexico City, Mexico
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2012. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.2.2 Drilling Optimisation, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 1.6.1 Drilling Operation Management, 7.6.2 Data Integration, 3.2.4 Acidising, 1.10.1 Drill string components and drilling tools (tubulars, jars, subs, stabilisers, reamers, etc), 1.5 Drill Bits, 5.6.9 Production Forecasting, 4.3 Flow Assurance, 2.7.1 Completion Fluids, 5.6.3 Deterministic Methods, 1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials, 4.3.4 Scale, 4.6 Natural Gas, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 1.6.5 Drilling Time Analysis, 1.4.1 BHA Design, 1.1 Well Planning, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.12.6 Drilling Data Management and Standards, 1.8 Formation Damage, 1.6.3 Drilling Optimisation, 5.8.1 Tight Gas, 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 7.6.4 Data Mining
- 9 in the last 30 days
- 551 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
The oil and gas industry is engulfed by a plethora of disparate data collated across multiple geoscientific and siloed disciplines. Moreover, the data are growing exponentially as digital oilfields are being implemented in some fashion to manage conventional and unconventional assets. Performing exploratory data analysis and generating data marts tailored to specific advanced analytical workflows are cornerstones to enable development and deployment of predictive models that are data driven, both in real-time and across historical data sets.
To build data driven models that can predict under uncertainty is essential to rapidly identify multi-dimensional parameters in a multivariate environment and thus surface hidden patterns and relationships in data that subsequently reduce time and resources in the critical decision-making cycles. With improved workflows and advances in High Performance Computing, it is now possible to ascertain risk and quantify uncertainty for very large populations of data without sampling and losing knowledge garnered by predictive models driven by the data and not by empirical petroleum engineering algorithms or deterministic methodologies. By marrying the stochastic with the interpretive school of thought, the upstream community can maintain robust data driven models that are kept current as new data are introduced.
This paper draws upon two case studies that ameliorate the path from raw data to invaluable knowledge. We shall look at a suite of predictive models driven by real-time data that were built upon patterns surfaced in historical data. These models have been implemented to identify optimized drilling and production strategies in the North American tight gas plays and acid stimulation strategies in the Gulf of Mexico.
Currently it is a commonplace activity among geoscientists to be reactive and not proactive when deliberating optimized remediation strategies to preclude wellbore impairment in the unconventional reservoirs in the United States. This ineffective practice is driven primarily by an explosion in drilling and production data that are not modeled sufficiently well owing to a lack of structured analytical methodologies to surface knowledge from the raw data. As a result of poor decision-making and inept exploitation plans and tactics valuable production is lost while awaiting optimized remediation processes to be enacted. It is necessary to rank viable remediations based on historical production rates post all strategies, and via a statistical process determine the optimized remediation, be it a hydraulic package or acid stimulation. It is thus plausible to optimize well performance by modeling drivers and leading indicators of production.
The first step of any analytical workflow is data cleansing, as seen in Figure 1 that depicts the SEMMA process detailing the progression of analytical steps including Sample, Explore, Modify, Model and Assess. The core steps follow a robust and logical path where data are accessed and controlled (Sample), then explored with various statistical methods and exploratory data visualization techniques for determining hypotheses worth modeling (Explore). Where missing or unreliable data are present, techniques for normalization, filtering and imputation are implemented (Modify) before proceeding to a suite of various model configurations (Model). Finally control of the model deployment and usage phases are enacted to deliver optimum results (Assess).
|File Size||1023 KB||Number of Pages||14|