Impact of Fluvial Geological Characteristics on EOR Screening of a Large Heavy Oil Field
- Arash Soleimani (Schlumberger Oilfield Services) | Richard K. Penney (Schlumberger) | Osama Hegazy (Schlumberger) | Ab Wahab Bin Ngah (WNPOC) | Abdalla Elhaj Sulliman | Raj Deo Tewari (Sudapet Co Ltd)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, 19-21 July, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.3.9 Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage, 5.4.7 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 4.1.5 Processing Equipment
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 583 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Many fields in the Middle East suffer from low recovery and declines in primary production due to low oil gravity (<20 API) and viscosities above 100 cP. The studied field contains well in excess of 1 billion barrels in place with overall recovery expected to be less than 10% without EOR. 75% of the STOIIP comprises 20 API oil with 120-160 CP viscosity while the remainder comprises 17 API with 800 cP viscosity. Complicating matters, the three main sandstone reservoirs vary from braided fluvial streams in Upper formation (A), to thick sheet sands in the middle formation (B) and thinner sands separated vertically by thin shales in the Lower formation C.
In this study EOR techniques have been assessed for these three formations in order to recommend suitable development options for the field. Simulation schemes were developed for the following seven recovery mechanisms, including, water flood, chemical EOR - polymer and ASP, thermal EOR - CSS, steam flood, SAGD and in-situ combustion. Due to geological and fluid variation in these three formations, EOR mechanism behaves differently in terms of recovery for each reservoir.
The three most promising techniques, ASP, steam flood/CSS and insitu combustion were then developed to optimise pattern spacing and injection rates for each technique and for all three formations in this field.
Heterogeneity and geological factors have different impacts on the various EOR mechanisms, including convective methods like ASP and polymer flooding and convective-conductive methods like Thermal EOR. Overall, thermal EOR has been found to be more effective and economically feasible for this field, in particular for the heterogeneous formation with high viscosity oil. Different EOR techniques could be considered for each formation due to the variation in heterogeneity,
with recovery also changing from one formation to another due to fluid viscosity.
Different thermal schemes, for example varying the number of steam injection cycles before continuous steam injection, have been suggested for each formation in respect to its heterogeneity and oil properties. It is also noted that a SAGD EOR process can be more effective in certain formations in this field.
The studied field is located in the Middle East and contains oil in an accumulation covering an area some 13 km by 5 km. These shallow reservoirs, 1100 to 1250 m depth, have porosities ranging from 18 to 35% and permeability from 100mD to more than 10000 mD. The reservoirs are low sinuosity, stacked fluvial channels (the middle and lower sands) overlain with high sinuosity, deltaic meandering channels in the upper formation (A), figure 1. 75% of the STOIIP comprises 20 API oil with 120-160 CP viscosity (upper and middle formation) while the remainder comprises 17 API with 800 cp viscosity (Lower Formation).
In the upper formation (A) , typically 15% of the reservoir having a channel environment, the poorest 30% of the reservoir comprising silts and shale and typical reservoir comprising a mixture of channel and silty facies. The proportion of channel facies increases in the middle and lower sands (B & C), with only 12-15% of the reservoir in the poorest facies. By considering permeability distributions (figure 2) and initial water saturations, withwith magnetic resonance logs indicating Swi varies from 30% to 70% for the upper formation and 20% to 55% for the middle and lower formations, it is apparent that the upper formation (A) has poorer reservoir quality than the middle and lower formations (B & C). Given a low primary and secondary recovery from field development activities, an EOR study has been considered to develop these reservoirs. These formations have different reservoir characteristic and geology which will impact on the individual EOR process in each reservoir.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||13|