Numerical Interpretation of Single Well Chemical Tracer Tests for ASP injection
- Albert Hendrik De Zwart (Shell Intl E&P Co) | Diederik W. van Batenburg (Shell Exploration & Production) | Martin Stoll (Shell E&P International Ltd) | Paulus Maria Boerrigter (Shell Development Co.) | Said Harthy (PDO)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 25-28 September, Manama, Bahrain
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.4 Scale, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 3.3.1 Production Logging, 2.2.2 Perforating, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 2.4.5 Gravel pack design & evaluation, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.5.8 History Matching, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 5.4.7 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 3.1.1 Beam and related pumping techniques, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.3.4 Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation, 3.1 Artificial Lift Systems, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.6.5 Tracers, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 501 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 9.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
A series of single well injection tests has been conducted to estimate the efficiency of Alkaline Surfactant Polymer (ASP) flooding. These injection tests comprised a Single Well Chemical Tracer (SWCT) test that was done after water injection to establish a baseline remaining oil saturation and a second SWCT test conducted after ASP injection to measure the Remaining Oil Saturation (ROS) after ASP.
Analytical methods are generally used to interpret SWCT tests and to determine the remaining oil saturation. These techniques work best when the response is close to an ideal, single peak. However, the responses from the SWCT tests in our single well tests sequences are complex, showing multiple peaks. This is indicative of complicating factors such as cross-flow between layers. To understand the complex response we used numerical simulation techniques to interpret the SWCT tests. The numerical model includes the physics of ASP, such as interfacial tension reduction, water viscosity modification, and the related reduction in ROS as wells as an accurate model for tracer dispersion. The model allows full control of physical dispersion and does not require the use of numerical diffusion to mimic the effect of physical dispersion. The numerical simulation sequence involves the full single well injection test history including SWCT tests before and after the ASP injection.
The key challenge in matching the tests results with the numerical simulations was to model the complex response, which was different for each well tested. Elaborate numerical simulations, different from the conventional interpretation method, were used to successfully match all tests. This paper presents the simulation work, an explanation of the parameters varied to obtain agreement between numerically predicted and actual SWCT responses and the numerical simulation tools used to match the SWCT tests.
In this paper we present the analysis of a series of single well ASP injection tests. These tests were carried out to assess the ability to reduce the ROS of tailor-made chemical formulations under real subsurface conditions, and to quantify the potential benefits of full-field ASP developments. Details on the design of these single well trials have been presented earlier by Oyemade et al. (2010) and Stoll et al. (2010).
|File Size||6 MB||Number of Pages||19|