Case Study: Evaluation of an Oxidative Biocide During and After a Hydraulic Fracturing Job in the Marcellus Shale
- Shawn M. Rimassa (BASF Oilfield and Mining) | Paul R. Howard (Schlumberger) | Bruce MacKay (Schlumberger) | Kristel Arrington Blow (Schlumberger) | Noel Coffman (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, 11-13 April, The Woodlands, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2011. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.4 Scale, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 1.8 Formation Damage, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 5.4.10 Microbial Methods, 4.2.3 Materials and Corrosion, 3.4.5 Bacterial Contamination and Control, 4.1.9 Tanks and storage systems, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4.3.1 Hydrates
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 600 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 8.50|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 25.00|
Effective microbiological control is an important aspect of a successfully executed fracturing job. Control of bacterial growth is often accomplished through the use of biocides such as glutaraldehyde, particularly in the multi-stage, high-volume fracturing of unconventional shale gas reservoirs. Biocidal additives, which are toxic by necessity, can persist in flowback water, so their use in shale fracturing has come under increasing scrutiny since high biocide concentrations in flowback water increase fluid cost and limit the options for disposal. The case for designing a bactericide program to match, and not exceed, the required amount of bacterial control is clear, but rarely is the bacterial load determined during and after the job to verify this balance.
Herein, we report a case study undertaken to evaluate the bacterial load of field mix water and flowback water during and after a large hydraulic fracturing job in the Marcellus Shale. A novel oxidative biocide product was used during the fracturing job that has both an effective fast kill and a low toxicity profile (e.g. HMIS rating of 1,0,0). Because of its rapid biodegradability, there was concern that the effective kill of this biocide would not persist beyond a few days. Industry standard techniques (NACE Std. TMO194-94) for quantifying bacteria were applied to water samples taken during the job and over several weeks of production. The biocide was also evaluated for compatibility with common fracturing additives and for its corrosivity to surface equipment and tubular goods.
This study determines that the new biocide does not persist in flowback water beyond a few days. However, analysis of flowback water samples reveals that the bacteria count stays low (less than 10 cells/mL) for up to 81 days after application of this biocide in a slickwater fluid. Additionally, genetic fingerprinting using Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Analysis (DGGE) was applied to the bacteria in the initial field mix water to allow comparison to any bacteria detected in the flowback samples. This paper will describe the details of this case study.
Since the completion of this case study, we have successfully deployed this technology on treatments in the Barnett, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Granite Wash shale regions. This paper reveals details of a field test and of the efficacy of this biocide as tested in flowback waters from the Piceance and Marcellus Shale basin. The results of the bacteria enumerated from each job site sample are presented. Finally, dosage requirements for biocidal efficacy were optimized for slickwater hydraulic fracturing applications are described.
Control of microbial growth is an essential consideration in the design of fracturing fluids. (Brandon, et al., 1995) Because of their ability to rapidly degrade biopolymers such as guar, bacterial enzymes can seriously affect the rheology of traditional gels. Slickwater fracturing fluids, where viscosity is not critical and the (typically synthetic) drag-reducing polymers are unaffected by bacterial enzymes, also require a biocide strategy to prevent well damage. The re-use of produced water (PW) in slickwater campaigns raises the risk of introducing anaerobic bacteria to the well, because PW is generally less oxygenated (Seright, et al., 2009) and is often rich with inorganic nutrients. Acid-producing bacteria (APB), and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) can cause problematic localized corrosion to completions and tubular goods. (Nemati and Voordouw, 2000) The latter can also be responsible for well souring and iron sulfide precipitation in the low-oxygen wellbore environment. (Carpenter and Nalepa, 2005) These and other general heterotrophic bacteria (GHB) can form biofilms that damage proppant packs and impair production flow, and can be problematic for surface equipment and even pipelines. (Bottero, et al., 2010).
|File Size||415 KB||Number of Pages||10|