History-Matching with Sensitivity-Based Parameter Modifications at Gridblock Level
- Hussein Almuallim | Kelly Allan Edwards (Barrick Energy Inc) | Leonhard Ganzer (Tech. U. Clausthal)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, 14-17 June, Barcelona, Spain
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 2.2.2 Perforating, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 5.5.8 History Matching
- 11 in the last 30 days
- 422 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 28.00|
Traditionally, history-matching has been a trial-and-error process, where various model parameters are repeatedly adjusted over successive simulation runs so that the difference, or mismatch, between simulated and observed values is minimized. In general, the relationship between such mismatch and the values of the parameters is quite complex. A great deal of expertise is required to figure out patterns that capture such relationship intuitively. Moreover, the number of parameters is so immense that the engineer has to restrict the attention to a small set of parameters, possibly missing influential ones.
In this work, we rigorously compute the derivatives of the mismatch with respect to each parameter, taking advantage of all pieces of simulator outputs, as well as our detailed knowledge of the fluid flow equations implemented within the reservoir fluid-flow simulator. With this new approach, a single simulation run followed by a derivatives calculation session is sufficient to detect how each parameter affects the mismatch, and hence, to decide how (or whether) to change each parameter to improve the match.
This approach has been successfully applied to history-match a three-phase case of a reservoir in North America with 45 years of production history and more than 40 wells. We started from a case that has already been matched through conventional means. We show that, based on our technique, very significant improvements can be achieved beyond the point where conventional means have been exhausted using only a small number of simulation runs.
Reservoir simulation models are widely employed in practical multiphase fluid-flow studies that forecast future performance and make crucial decisions on managing hydrocarbon reservoirs. For such studies to lead to reliable conclusions, a key requirement is to ensure that the reservoir model is consistent with all the available data.
Constructing reservoir models that are consistent with the available geophysical and geological static data is possible and relatively well understood. The main challenge is to condition such models to the available production dynamic data through the process of history-matching.
Conventional history-matching is a trial-and-error process, where various model parameters are repeatedly adjusted over successive simulation runs so that the mismatch between simulated and observed values is minimized. A great deal of expertise is required to figure out patterns that capture the relationship between mismatch and the model parameters. Moreover, the number of model parameters is so vast that the engineer in conventional approaches has to restrict the attention to a small set of parameters believed to be the most influential subset.
|File Size||5 MB||Number of Pages||11|