Please enable JavaScript for this site to function properly.
OnePetro
  • Help
  • About us
  • Contact us
Menu
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Log in / Register

Log in to your subscription

and
Advanced search Show search help
  • Full text
  • Author
  • Company/Institution
  • Publisher
  • Journal
  • Conference
Boolean operators
This OR that
This AND that
This NOT that
Must include "This" and "That"
This That
Must not include "That"
This -That
"This" is optional
This +That
Exact phrase "This That"
"This That"
Grouping
(this AND that) OR (that AND other)
Specifying fields
publisher:"Publisher Name"
author:(Smith OR Jones)

Microemulsion-Assisted Fluid Recovery and Improved Permeability to Gas in Shale Formations

Authors
Andrei S. Zelenev (CESI Chemical) | Hui Zhou (CESI Chemical) | Linda Ellena | Glenn S. Penny (CESI Chemical)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/127922-MS
Document ID
SPE-127922-MS
Publisher
Society of Petroleum Engineers
Source
SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, 10-12 February, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA
Publication Date
2010
Document Type
Conference Paper
Language
English
ISBN
978-1-55563-276-2
Copyright
2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
Disciplines
1.6.6 Directional Drilling, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.8.1 Tight Gas, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.8 Formation Damage, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.8.2 Shale Gas, 2.7.1 Completion Fluids, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 4.6 Natural Gas, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 3.2.3 Hydraulic Fracturing Design, Implementation and Optimisation, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating
Downloads
3 in the last 30 days
994 since 2007
Show more detail
View rights & permissions
SPE Member Price: USD 8.50
SPE Non-Member Price: USD 25.00

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing of shale formations presents a well-known challenge due to high entrapment of frac fluids. Typical levels of fluid recovery from shale formations are on the order of 30% or lower. Fluid loss into shale produces liquid blocks that interfere with the gas flow in already tight formations. Friction reducers or other additives present in fluids can cause further formation damage.  Search for technologies that would maximize gas flow rate and yield high recoveries is on-going. In recent years microemulsions have been successfully used for remediating damaged wells and enhancing production from tight gas formations. In the present work we have explored the use of such additives for improving fluid recoveries from columns packed with shale/sand mixtures and for improving permeability of split shale cores to gas.

Introduction

Shale reservoirs have a number of characteristic features associated with them, such as extremely low permeability of the rock, high organic content, high clay content, fine grain size and plate-like microporosity. At times of high natural gas prices an interest in producing from shale formations and the need for developing advanced technologies for drilling, fracturing, and completion in such formations is especially high. Chemical treatments constitute an inseparable part of shale gas production technologies. The role of chemical treatments in increasing natural gas production and load recoveries from shale formations has been documented in numerous publications [1-6]. These studies have illustrated that surfactant and microemulsion treatments can be used for enhancing gas flow rates and fluid flowback from shale formations. The benefits of surfactants and microemulsions are related to their surface activity, which is revealed as their ability to lower surface tension at a gas/water interface and influence contact angle at the gas/water/rock three-phase contact line.  Both surface tension and contact angle have a direct influence on capillary pressure, which is the main driving force for fluid penetration into the porous media. Capillary pressure is given by a well-known equation

Equation                                                                                       (1)

where ? is the surface tension, ? is contact angle, and r is the radius of pores.   For a liquid of density ??, capillary rise, h, determining the depth of liquid penetration, can be calculated as

Equation                                                                                       (2)

where g is the acceleration of gravity.  From Equations 1 and 2 it is immediately evident that fine porosity, common for shale formations, results in high capillary pressure and promotes formation damage due to fluid blockage. Indeed, it is well known that load recoveries from shale formations are very low, and without using stimulation chemicals often do not exceed 20-30% [6]. Consequently, improving the flowback of injected fluids or recovery of formation fluids is directly linked to enhancing permeability of shale formations to gas, thus making production from such formations economically viable.

The treatment of shale formations with microemulsions results in an improved gas production rates and increased fluid recovery levels, often exceeding those achieved with common surfactants, as has been exemplified in the studies describing fracturing jobs in Barnette and Marcellus shale formations [1,6]. Although these and other studies indicated good performance of microemulsions in these applications, there is still a rather limited number of experimental laboratory evaluations aimed at investigating the benefits of using micoremulsion technology for enhanced gas production and fluid recoveries from shale rocks. More such studies are especially desirable in view of recently reported success in horizontal drilling in shale formations [7,8].

File Size  232 KBNumber of Pages   7

Other Resources

Looking for more? 

Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.


 


PetroWiki was initially created from the seven volume  Petroleum Engineering Handbook (PEH) published by the  Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).








The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Copyright © SPE All rights reserved
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Help
  • Terms of use
  • Publishers
  • Content Coverage
  • Privacy
  Administration log in