Understanding and overcoming risks of CSEM for reservoir monitoring
- Sofia Davydycheva (KMS Technologies) | Tilman Hanstein (KMS Technologies) | Maxim Smirnov (KMS Technologies) | Kurt Strack (KMS Technologies)
- Document ID
- Society of Exploration Geophysicists
- 2018 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, 14-19 October, Anaheim, California, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Society of Exploration Geophysicists
- Electromagnetics, Time-domain, Time-lapse, Reservoir characterization, 3D
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 19 since 2007
- Show more detail
A new technology for reservoir monitoring includes full field controlled-source electromagnetics (CSEM) and microseismics. To mitigate the risk, we have developed full technology cycle: from patents, hardware, acquisition methodology, to data processing and interpreting in 3D. The system can acquire surface-to-surface and surface-to-borehole measurements. EM data are used to track fluids, due to their high sensitivity to the fluid resistivity while seismic data relate primarily to the reservoir boundaries. Having seismic and EM sensors in the same recording unit allows the addressing of the multi-physics character of the problem early on in the workflow. The system enables acquiring large number of EM data channels at low cost similar to what is done with seismic data.
Typical risks are lack of EM image focus, formation resistivity anisotropy and unaccounted effects of steel casing(s). To mitigate these risks, we apply careful 3D modeling feasibility studies and acquire dense EM field data. In addition, we apply a novel method to focus the EM image information directly below the receiver. Operational risks include low signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio, issues related to the transmitter stability, to the stability of the groundings, and data processing inefficiency. Understanding and mitigation of these risks is key to successful reservoir monitoring job.
Presentation Date: Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Start Time: 9:20:00 AM
Location: Poster Station 15
Presentation Type: Poster
|File Size||761 KB||Number of Pages||5|
Bachinger,F.,U.Langer, andJ.Schöberl,2006,Efficient solvers for nonlinear time-periodic eddy current problem:Computing and Visualization in Science,9,197–207,10.1007/s00791-006-0023-z.
Constable,S.,2010,Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration:Geophysics,75,no.5,75A67–75A81,10.1190/1.3483451.
Davydycheva,S., andN. I.Rykhlinski,2009,Focused Source EM Survey versus time- and frequency-domain CSEM:The Leading Edge,28,944–949,10.1190/1.3192841.
Davydycheva,S., andN. I.Rykhlinski,2011,Focused-source electromagnetic survey versus standard CSEM: 3D modeling in complex geometries:Geophysics,76,no.1,F27–F41,10.1190/1.3511353.
Hill,K. S.,K.Lucas, andK.Bradley,2010,Structural styles in the Papuan Fold Belt, Papua New Guinea: Constrains from analogue modeling:Geological Society, London,Special Publications,348,353–434,10.1144/SP348.3.
Hoversten,G. M.,1996,Papua New Guinea MT: Looking where seismic is blind:Geophysical Prospecting,44,935–961,10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00185.x.
Hoversten,G. M.,M.Commer,E.Haber, andC.Schwarzbach,2015,Hydro-frac monitoring using ground time-domain electromagnetics:Geophysical Prospecting,63,1508–1526,10.1111/1365-2478.12300.
Passalacqua,H.,P.Boonyasaknanoon, andK.Strack,2016,Integrated geophysical reservoir monitoring for heavy oil:Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, SPE,10.2118/184089-MS.
Strack,K. M.,2014,Future directions of electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon applications:Surveys in Geophysics,35,157–177,10.1007/s10712-013-9237-z.
Tietze,K.,A.Grayver,R.Streich, andO.Ritter,2014,Recent developments for land-based controlled source EM Surveying,76th Annual International Conference and Exhibition, EAGE,Extended Abstracts,10.3997/2214-4609.20140561.
Tietze,K.,O.Ritter, andP.Veeken,2015,Controlled source electromagnetic monitoring of reservoir oil Saturation using a novel borehole-to-surface configuration:Geophysical Prospecting,63,1468–1490,10.1111/1365-2478.12322.