Operators Optimize High-Pressure/High-Temperature and Ultrahigh-Pressure Perforation Strategies Using Laboratory Testing
- Brenden Grove (Halliburton-Jet Research Center) | Rory DeHart (Halliburton-Jet Research Center) | Jacob McGregor (Halliburton-Jet Research Center) | Haggerty Dennis (Halliburton-Jet Research Center) | Chow Christopher (ProDuce Consulting)
- Document ID
- Offshore Technology Conference
- Offshore Technology Conference, 6-9 May, Houston, Texas
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. Offshore Technology Conference
- 2.2 Installation and Completion Operations, 2 Well completion, 2.1.3 Completion Equipment, 2.4 Sand Control, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 3 Production and Well Operations, 2.2.2 Perforating, 7 Management and Information, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 1.14 Casing and Cementing, 3 Production and Well Operations, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment
- HPHT, perforating, laboratory, risk reduction, qualification testing
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 224 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
Multiple perforation laboratory programs have been conducted during recent years to support high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) and ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) oil and gas field developments at various offshore locations globally. This paper highlights six such projects that supported activities within the Asia-Pacific, North Sea, and US Gulf of Mexico (GOM) (both Miocene and Lower Tertiary) regions. Each program was designed and conducted in collaboration with an operator and field operations personnel to help reduce potential risks, improve operational efficiency, and optimize well performance across a variety of challenging environments.
Laboratory experiments were based on API RP 19B Sections 2 and 4, with test conditions customized to match specific downhole environments of interest (rock and fluid properties, stress, pressure, temperature, and flow scenarios). Matching downhole conditions at the laboratory proved important because this yields results that can be quite different from those obtained at surface (or scaled) test conditions. Reliable estimations of field perforation skin, sanding propensity, and the effectiveness of subsequent stimulation operations depend on realistic perforation and flow data obtained at relevant downhole conditions. The overriding goal for test design is to create and expose the laboratory perforation in an environment that matches its field counterpart as closely as possible. Beyond obtaining accurate flow data for skin and/or sanding propensity determination, post-test diagnostics, such as computed tomography (CT) and optical techniques, provide additional essential insight into the characteristics of the perforation tunnel, core interior, and the hole through the casing and cement.
Results from these various programs were used to confirm or, in some cases, guide the field perforating strategy.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||22|
Ayre, D.,Atwood, D.,Geerts, S.et al. 2017. API RP 19B Section 2 Perforation Tests Conducted at Multiple Facilities to Guide the Latest Section 2 Revision. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 9–11 October. SPE-187408-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/187408-MS.
Chang, F. F., Kageson-Loe, N. M.,Walton, I. C.et al. 2004. Perforating in Overbalance – Is It Really Sinful? SPE Drill & Compl 19 (03):173–180. SPE-82203-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/82203-PA.
Crabtree, P.,Underdown, D., and Grove, B. 2018. Perforation Laboratory Testing: How Close is Close Enough? Presented at the North American Perforating Symposium, Galveston, Texas. https://perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/6_1-2018-NAPS-21-Matching-Field-Conditions-in-the-perforation-laboratory_how-close-is-close-enough.pdf.
Fleming, N.,Karunakaran, M., and Hireche, S. 2018. Qualification and Implementation of Oil-Based Mud as a Cost-Effective and Low-Damaging Perforation Fluid for High-Pressure/High-Temperature Fields: Gudrun Case History, SPE Prod & Oper 1–17. SPE-189531-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/189531-PA.
Grove, B.,Grader, A.,Derzhi, N.et al. 2019. Perforation Damage, Cleanup, and Inflow Performance; Advances in Diagnostics and Characterization. Presented at the North American Perforating Symposium, Galveston, Texas. https://perforators.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/4_2-2018-NAPS-20-Perforation-Damage-Cleanup-and-Inflow-Performance.pdf.
Grove, B. M.,Heiland, J. C.,Walton, I. C.et al. 2009. New Effective Stress Law for Predicting Perforation Depth at Downhole Conditions. SPE Drill & Compl 24 (04): 678–685. SPE-111778-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/111778-PA.
Haggerty, D. and Christie, S. 2015. Operator Uses Advanced Perforation Flow Laboratory to Support HMX Perforating by Coiled Tubing in HPHT Field. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference and Exhibition, Budapest, Hungary, 3–5 June. SPE-174173-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174173-MS.
Haggerty, D.,McGregor, J., and Akhmadikin, V. 2017. Configuring Dynamic Underbalance to Achieve Perforation Tunnel Cleanup in a Gas Well at High Static Overbalance. Presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 13–16 November. SPE-188769-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/188769-MS.
Halliburton.com. 2019. About HP/HT, https://www.halliburton.com/en-US/ps/solutions/high-pressure-temperature/about-hp-ht-ht.html (accessed January 2019).
Harvey, J. P.,Grove, B. M., and Zhan, L. 2012. Stressed Rock Penetration Depth Correlation. Presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, 15–17 February. SPE-151846-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/151846-MS.
Procyk, A. D.,Burton, R. C.,Atwood, D. C.et al. 2012. Optimizing Cased and Perforated Completion Designs Through The Use of API RP-19B Laboratory Testing to Maximize Well Productivity. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–10 October. SPE-159920-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/159920-MS.
Schatz, J. F.,Haney, B. L., and Ager, S. A. 1999. High-Speed Downhole Memory Recorder and Software Used to Design and Confirm Perforating/Propellant Behavior and Formation Fracturing. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 3–6 October. SPE-56434-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/56434-MS.