Unlocking the Potential of Naturally Fractured Basal Clastic Volcanic Rock Using Hydraulic Fracturing: First Successful Campaign Conducted in Mumbai High Field, India
- Ravindra M Patil (ONGC) | Ashok Kumar Koduru (ONGC) | P. V. R. Murthy (ONGC) | Karan Pande (Halliburton) | Kutbuddin Bhatia (Halliburton)
- Document ID
- Offshore Technology Conference
- Offshore Technology Conference Asia, 20-23 March, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2018. Offshore Technology Conference
- 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 2.2 Installation and Completion Operations, 2.6 Acidizing, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 3 Production and Well Operations, 3.1.6 Gas Lift, 3.1 Artificial Lift Systems, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 2.4.1 Fracture design and containment, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 3 Production and Well Operations, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 2.1.3 Completion Equipment, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 2 Well completion, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 4.1 Processing Systems and Design, 2.2.2 Perforating
- volcanic basement, fracturing, unconventional oil, production enhancement, Stimulation
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 139 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
The basal clastic sand (BCS) unit is derived from a granitic basement and forms the lower part of the Mumbai High field. Oil indicators in unconventional reservoirs, such as basement and BCS, were explored here before 1987; however, these reservoirs were not targeted for more than two decades after drilling the first exploratory well in 1989. Huge potential in BCS resources remained untapped, and monetizing these resources became possible because of extensive hydraulic fracturing design optimization for these layers.
Previously, acid stimulation treatment failed to provide any improvement in the BCS reservoir. Because BCS is derived from a granitic basement and contains clay minerals (kaolinite and chlorite), heavy minerals, siderite, pyrite, hematite, etc., it is difficult to obtain gains using acid stimulation because of poor leakoff and associated reaction kinetics. However, stimulation using hydraulic fracturing with proppants proves to be the ultimate productivity enhancement tool and is the prudent alternative.
The first hydraulic fracturing attempt in BCS was performed at Well B in 2013 and was unsuccessful because proppant placement and admittance are extremely difficult in these layers. High net pressure and complex branch growth were identified to be the core causes of premature screenout in this layer. Post-treatment pressure evaluation indicated propagation of short fissures and fractures leading to a complex fracture plane that reduced overall fracture conductivity.
Subsequently, Well A was diverted from the original location, completed in the BCS reservoir, and selected as a candidate for proppant fracturing. The stimulation strategy was designed to meet stimulation challenges of the BCS formation. Perforation designs were revised to reduce near-wellbore tortuosity and perforation friction. After perforating, the well was treated with an acetic acid cushion against the target zone. A new fracturing treatment design based on slug and sweep, where the slug stages were increased, was used to control excessive near-wellbore complex fracture growth. Aggressive pumping rates and high conductivity proppant size and concentration were designed to help increase stimulation efficiency. These unconventional modifications aided successful placement of the fracture plane in the BCS reservoir in Well A.
Well A initially produced 202 BOPD; however, production declined because of the tight nature of the BCS reservoir. Later, the well produced 100 BOPD with gas lift. After hydraulic fracturing treatment for this well was successfully performed, as per the modified design, the production increased to 1,580 BLPD with 100% oil and no artificial lift using a 1/2-in. choke. This paper highlights design considerations, execution results, and post-treatment evaluation of this extremely challenging BCS volcanic rock and can be viewed as a best practice for addressing stimulation challenges in similar volcanic reservoirs in other fields.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Britt, L. K., Smith, M. B., Haddad, Z. A.. 2006. Waterfracs: We Do Need Proppant After All. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24-27 September. SPE-102227-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/102227-MS.
Cipolla, C. L., Warpinski, N. R., Mayerhofer, M.. 2010. The Relationship Between Fracture Complexity, Reservoir Properties, and Fracture-Treatment Design. SPE Prod & Oper, 25 (04). SPE-115769-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/115769-PA.
DGHIndia.gov.in. 2017. Mumbai Offshore Basin, http://www.dghindia.gov.in/assets/downloads/56cfd7ae55eb2Mumbai_Offshore_basin.pdf (accessed 6 December 2017).
Moonan, X., Kimber, R., and Nagassar, V. T. 2016. Unlocking the Potential of the Basal Sands, Paria Sub-Basin, Trinidad and Tobago. Presented at the SPE Trinidad and Tobago Section Energy Resources Conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, 13-15 June. SPE-180896-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180896-MS.
Weijers, L., Griffin, L. G., Sugiyama, H.. 2002. The First Successful Fracture Treatment Campaign Conducted in Japan: Stimulation Challenges in a Deep, Naturally Fractured Volcanic Rock. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September-02 October, SPE-77678-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/77678-MS.