The Dependence of Methane Foam Transport on Rock Permeabilities and Foam Simulation on Fluid Diversion in Heterogeneous Model Reservoir

Authors
Y. Zeng (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Rice University) | R. Z. Kamarul Bahrim (Petronas) | S. Vincent Bonnieu (Shell Global Solutions International) | J. Groenenboom (Shell Malaysia) | S. R. Mohd Shafian (Petronas) | A. A. Abdul Manap (Petronas) | R. D. Tewari (Petronas) | S. L. Biswal (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Rice University)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4043/28229-MS
Document ID
OTC-28229-MS
Publisher
Offshore Technology Conference
Source
Offshore Technology Conference Asia, 20-23 March, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Publication Date
2018
Document Type
Conference Paper
Language
English
ISBN
978-1-61399-552-5
Copyright
2018. Offshore Technology Conference
Disciplines
5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 2 Well completion, 2.4 Hydraulic Fracturing, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5.4 Improved and Enhanced Recovery, 5 Reservoir Desciption & Dynamics, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.7 Reserves Evaluation
Keywords
Reservoir and Characterization, Modeling & Simulation, Mobility Control & Conformance of Oil Displacement, Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery, Texture Implicit Local Equilibrium Model
Downloads
1 in the last 30 days
174 since 2007
Show more detail
View rights & permissions
Price: USD 12.00
Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of rock permeability on foam transport in porous media both at the core-level and at the field level for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications. Foam offers promise to simultaneously address the issues that limit the overall oil recovery efficiency of water-alternating-gas (WAG) process such as viscous fingering, gravity override, and reservoir heterogeneity. However, in the literature, limited foam data were reported using actual reservoir cores at harsh conditions. In this paper, a series of methane (CH4) foam flooding experiments were conducted in 3 different actual cores from a proprietary reservoir at elevated temperature. It is found that foam strength is significantly correlated with rock permeability. We calculated the apparent viscosity based on the measured pressure drop along the core samples at steady state. The calculated apparent viscosity was found to be selectively higher in cores of high permeabilities compared to that in cores of low permeabilities. We parameterized our foam system using a texture-implicit-local-equilibrium model to understand the dependence of foam parameters on rock permeability. In addition, we established a 2-layered heterogeneous model reservoir in the Shell in-house simulator called MoReS (Modular Reservoir Simulator) to systematically study and compare the driving forces for fluid diversion during foam flooding at the field level including the gravitational force, the viscous force, and the capillary force. During the WAG process, gravitational force kept the gas from sweeping the lower part of the reservoir. The gravity can be overcome by viscosifying the gas with surfactant solution. In addition, capillary pressure which hinders the gas from entering the low permeability region can actually redistribute the two phases during foam EOR and improves the sweep efficiency. It is concluded that foam can effectively improve the conformance of the WAG EOR in the presence of reservoir heterogeneity.

File Size  1 MBNumber of Pages   16

Aarthi, M., 2015. Foam Rheology of Zwitterionic Anionic Surfactant Blends in Porous Media (PhD Thesis). Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.

Al Sumaiti, A., Shaik, A.R., Mathew, E.S., Al Ameri, W., 2017. Tuning Foam Parameters for Mobility Control using CO 2 Foam: Field Application to Maximize Oil Recovery from a High Temperature High Salinity Layered Carbonate Reservoir. Energy Fuels 31, 4637–4654. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02595

Alvarez, J.M., Rivas, H.J., Rossen, W.R., others, 2001. Unified model for steady-state foam behavior at high and low foam qualities. SPE J. 6, 325–333.

Apaydin, O.G., Kovscek, A.R., 2000. Transient Foam Flow in Homogeneous Porous Media: Surfactant Concentration and Capillary End Effects. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 3-5 April, 2000, Tulsa, Oklahoma https://doi.org/10.2118/59286-MS

Basheva, E.S., Ganchev, D., Denkov, N.D., Kasuga, K., Satoh, N., Tsujii, K., 2000. Role of betaine as foam booster in the presence of silicone oil drops. Langmuir 16, 1000–1013.

Basheva, E.S., Stoyanov, S., Denkov, N.D., Kasuga, K., Satoh, N., Tsujii, K., 2001. Foam Boosting by Amphiphilic Molecules in the Presence of Silicone Oil. Langmuir 17, 969–979. https://doi.org/10.1021/la001106a

Berg, J.C., 2010. An introduction to interfaces & colloids: the bridge to nanoscience. World Scientific, Singapore; Hackensack, NJ.

Bernard, G.G., Jacobs, W.L., 1965. Effect of Foam on Trapped Gas Saturation and on Permeability of Porous Media to Water. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 5, 295–300. https://doi.org/10.2118/1204-PA

Boeije, C.S., Rossen, W., 2015. Fitting Foam-Simulation-Model Parameters to Data: I. Coinjection of Gas and Liquid. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 18, 264–272. https://doi.org/10.2118/174544-PA

Chang, S.H., Owusu, L.A., French, S.B., Kovarik, F.S., 1990. The Effect of Microscopic Heterogeneity on CO2 -Foam Mobility: Part 2-Mechanistic Foam Simulation. Presented at SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, 22-25 April, 1990, Tulsa, Oklahoma. https://doi.org/10.2118/20191-MS

Christov, N.C., Denkov, N.D., Kralchevsky, P.A., Ananthapadmanabhan, K.P., Lips, A., 2004. Synergistic Sphere-to-Rod Micelle Transition in Mixed Solutions of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Cocoamidopropyl Betaine. Langmuir 20, 565–571. https://doi.org/10.1021/la035717p

Conn, C.A., Ma, K., Hirasaki, G.J., Biswal, S.L., 2014. Visualizing oil displacement with foam in a microfluidic device with permeability contrast. Lab on a Chip 14, 3968–3977. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4LC00620H

Cui, L., Ma, K., Puerto, M., Abdala, A.A., Tanakov, I., Lu, L.J., Chen, Y., Elhag, A., Johnston, K.P., Biswal, S.L., Hirasaki, G., 2016. Mobility of Ethomeen C12 and Carbon Dioxide Foam at High Temperature/High Salinity and in Carbonate Cores. SPE J. https://doi.org/10.2118/179726-PA

Dong, P., Puerto, M., Ma, K., Mateen, K., Ren, G., Bourdarot, G., Morel, D., Bourrel, M., Biswal, S.L., Hirasaki, G., 2017. Low-Interfacial-Tension Foaming System for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Highly Heterogeneous/Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs. Presented at SPE International Conference on Oilfield Chemistry, 3-5 April, 2017, Montgomery, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/184569-MS

Eftekhari, A.A., Farajzadeh, R., 2017. Effect of Foam on Liquid Phase Mobility in Porous Media. Sci. Rep. 7, 43870. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43870

Ettinger, R.A., Radke, C.J., 1992. Influence of Texture on Steady Foam Flow in Berea Sandstone. SPE Reserv. Eng. 7, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.2118/19688-PA

Falls, A., Hirasaki, G., Patzek, T. e al, Gauglitz, D., Miller, D., Ratulowski, T., 1988. Development of a mechanistic foam simulator: the population balance and generation by snap-off. SPE Reserv. Eng. 3, 884–892.

Farajzadeh, R., Andrianov, A., Krastev, R., Hirasaki, G.J., Rossen, W.R., 2012. Foam–oil interaction in porous media: Implications for foam assisted enhanced oil recovery. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 183–184, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2012.07.002

Farajzadeh, R., Lotfollahi, M., Eftekhari, A.A., Rossen, W.R., Hirasaki, G.J.H., 2015. Effect of Permeability on Implicit-Texture Foam Model Parameters and the Limiting Capillary Pressure. Energy Fuels 29, 3011–3018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00248

Franklin M Orr, 2017. Theory of gas injection processes. Tie-Line Publications, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Géraud, B., Jones, S.A., Cantat, I., Dollet, B., Méheust, Y., 2016. The flow of a foam in a two-dimensional porous medium: Foam Flow in a 2-D Porous Media. Water Resour. Res. 52, 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017936

Green, D.W., Willhite, G.P., 1998. Enhanced Oil Recovery, SPE textbook series. Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Habermann, B., 1960. The Efficiency of Miscible Displacement as a Function of Mobility Ratio. Publ. Pet. Trans. AIME Pap. Present. 35th Annu. Fall Meet. SPE 219, 264–272.

Hiraski, G.J., 1989. The Steam-Foam Process. J. Pet. Technol. 41, 449–456. https://doi.org/10.2118/19505-PA

Israelachvili, J.N., 2011. Intermolecular and surface forces, 3rd ed. ed. Academic Press, Burlington, MA.

Jones, S.A., Laskaris, G., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., Farajzadeh, R., Rossen, W.R., 2016. Surfactant Effect On Foam: From Core Flood Experiments To Implicit-Texture Foam-Model Parameters. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, 11-13 April, 2016, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/179637-MS

Kam, S.I., Rossen, W., 2003. A model for foam generation in homogeneous media. SPE J. 8, 417–425.

Khatib, Z.I., Hirasaki, G.J., Falls, A.H., others, 1988. Effects of capillary pressure on coalescence and phase mobilities in foams flowing through porous media. SPE Reserv. Eng. 3, 919–926.

Kovscek, A.R., Patzek, T.W., Radke, C.J., 1995. A mechanistic population balance model for transient and steady-state foam flow in Boise sandstone. Chem. Eng. Sci. 50, 3783–3799. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(95)00199-F

Kovscek, A.R., Radke, C.J., 1994. Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry, Advances in Chemistry. American Chemical Society.

Lake, L., Johns, R., Rossen, W.R., Pope, G., 2014. Fundementals of Enhanced Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Lotfollahi, M., Farajzadeh, R., Delshad, M., Varavei, A., Rossen, W.R., 2016. Comparison of implicit-texture and population-balance foam models. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 31, 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.03.018

Ma, K., Lopez-Salinas, J.L., Puerto, M.C., Miller, C.A., Biswal, S.L., Hirasaki, G.J., 2013. Estimation of Parameters for the Simulation of Foam Flow through Porous Media. Part 1: The Dry-Out Effect. Energy Fuels 27, 2363–2375. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef302036s

Ma, K., Ren, G., Mateen, K., Morel, D., Cordelier, P., 2015. Modeling Techniques for Foam Flow in Porous Media. SPE J. 20, 453–470. https://doi.org/10.2118/169104-PA

Manlowe, D.J., Radke, C.J., 1990. A Pore-Level Investigation of Foam/Oil Interactions in Porous Media. SPE Reserv. Eng. 5, 495–502. https://doi.org/10.2118/18069-PA

Mannhardt, K., Svorstøl, I., 1999. Effect of oil saturation on foam propagation in Snorre reservoir core. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 23, 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(99)00016-9

Miller, C.A., Neogi, P., 2007. Interfacial phenomena: equilibrium and dynamic effects. CRC Press.

Moradi-Araghi, A., Johnston, E.L., Zornes, D.R., Harpole, K.J., 1997. Laboratory Evaluation of Surfactants for CO2-Foam Applications at the South Cowden Unit. Presented at the International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, 18-21 February, 1997. https://doi.org/10.2118/37218-MS

Nwidee, L.N., Theophilus, S., Barifcani, A., Sarmadivaleh, M., Iglauer, S., 2016. EOR Processes, Opportunities and Technological Advancements, in: Romero-Zeron, L. (Ed.), Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery (CEOR) - a Practical Overview. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/64828

Patzek, T.W., Myhill, N.A., others, 1989. Simulation of the Bishop steam foam pilot. Presented at the SPE California Regional Meeting, 5-7 April, 1989, Bakersfield, California. https://doi.org/10.2118/18786-MS

Regtien, J.M.M., Por, G.J.A., van Stiphout, M.T., van der Vlugt, F.F., 1995. Interactive Reservoir Simulation. Presented in SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 12-15 February, 1995, San Antonio, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2118/29146-MS

Ren, G., Nguyen, Q.P., 2017. Understanding aqueous foam with novel CO2-soluble surfactants for controlling CO2 vertical sweep in sandstone reservoirs. Pet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-017-0149-2

Rossen, W.R., 2013. Numerical Challenges in Foam Simulation: A Review. Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 30 September-2 October, 2013, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA https://doi.org/10.2118/166232-MS

Rossen, W.R., Wang, M.W., 1999. Modeling Foams for Acid Diversion. SPE J. 4, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.2118/56396-PA

Simjoo, M., 2012. Immiscible foam for enhancing oil recovery. Pet. Eng. 187.

Spirov, P., Rudyk, S., Khan, A., 2012. Foam Assisted WAG, Snorre Revisit with New Foam Screening Model. Presented at North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, 20-22 February, 2012, Cairo, Egypt. https://doi.org/10.2118/150829-MS

Stevens, J.E., 1995. CO2 Foam Field Verification Pilot Test at EVGSAU: Phase IIIB--Project Operations and Performance Review. SPE Reserv. Eng. 10, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.2118/27786-PA

Svorstoel, I., Blaker, T., Arneson, S., Holt, T., Vassenden, F., M. Surguchev, L., 1995. Foam Pilot Evaluations for the Snorre Field, Part 2: Numerical Simulations and Economical Evaluations. Presented at the IOR 1995 – 8th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201406929

Svorstol, I., Vassenden, F., Mannhardt, K., 1996. Laboratory Studies for Design of a Foam Pilot in the Snorre Field. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 21-24 April, 1996. Tulsa, Oklahoma. https://doi.org/10.2118/35400-MS

Thomas, S., 2008. Enhanced oil recovery-an overview. Oil Gas Sci. Technol.-Rev. IFP 63, 9–19.

Wallace, M., Kuuskraa, V.A., Dipietro, P., 2014. Near-Term Projections of CO2 Utilization for Enhanced Oil Recovery (No. DOE/NETL-2014/1648). U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Notional Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL).

Wang, L., Asthagiri, D., Zeng, Y., Chapman, W.G., 2017. Simulation studies on the role of lauryl betaine in modulating the stability of AOS surfactant-stabilized foams used in enhanced oil recovery. Energy Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b03186

Xiao, S., Zeng, Y., Vavra, E.D., He, P., Puerto, M.C., Hirasaki, G.J., Biswal, S.L., 2017. Destabilization, Propagation, and Generation of Surfactant-Stabilized Foam during Crude Oil Displacement in Heterogeneous Model Porous Media. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02766

Zeng, Y., Farajzadeh, R., Eftekhari, A.A., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., Muthuswamy, A., Rossen, W.R., Hirasaki, G.J., Biswal, S.L., 2016a. Role of Gas Type on Foam Transport in Porous Media. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00949

Zeng, Y., Ma, K., Farajzadeh, R., Puerto, M., Biswal, S.L., Hirasaki, G.J., 2016b. Effect of Surfactant Partitioning Between Gaseous Phase and Aqueous Phase on $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Foam Transport for Enhanced Oil Recovery. Transp. Porous Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-016-0743-6

Zeng, Y., Muthuswamy, A., Ma, K., Wang, L., Farajzadeh, R., Puerto, M., Vincent-Bonnieu, S., Eftekhari, A.A., Wang, Y., Da, C., Joyce, J.C., Biswal, S.L., Hirasaki, G.J., 2016c. Insights on Foam Transport from a Texture-Implicit Local-Equilibrium Model with an Improved Parameter Estimation Algorithm. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55, 7819–7829. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01424

Other Resources

Looking for more? 

Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.


  

PetroWiki was initially created from the seven volume  Petroleum Engineering Handbook (PEH) published by the  Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).







The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.