Successful Design and Practices Shaping Up a Robust HPHT Well Completion Concept for Subsea-Horizontal Wells
- Eko Awan Yudha Fitnawan (Statoil ASA) | Stein Hovland (Statoil Stjordal) | Berit Sara Schiefloe (Statoil ASA) | Katrine Møller (Statoil ASA)
- Document ID
- Offshore Technology Conference
- Offshore Technology Conference, 2-5 May, Houston, Texas, USA
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2011. Offshore Technology Conference
- 2.1.3 Sand/Solids Control, 1.13.1 Casing Design, 4.6 Natural Gas, 1.7.5 Well Control, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 1.13 Casing and Cementing, 2 Well Completion, 3 Production and Well Operations, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.6.5 Tracers, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 2.1.1 Perforating, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 4.5.7 Controls and Umbilicals, 4.2.3 Materials and Corrosion, 4.2.4 Risers, 2.4.1 Completion Fluids, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 1,180 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
Several improvements on fluids, equipment, completion design and practices have been successfully implemented in the first subsea well of Morvin HPHT field offshore Norwegian Continental Shelf. These improvements are: 1) Using new heavy weight reduced solid oil-based completion fluid for running the lower completion (predrilled liner) and achieving the expected initial productivity ; 2) Extra well cleaning prior to running the lower and upper completion; 3) A designed predrilled liner combined with open hole swell packers for zonal isolation and HPHT tracer-subs for data acquisition; 4) Downhole barrier being installed as an integral part of the lower completion, eliminating the middle completion ; 5) New HPHT permanentretrievable production packer; and 6) Successful installation of downhole P/T gauge with pig tail connection below the tubing hanger. Completion operation on the first well was completed in 40 days (i.e. 12 days less than the planned days) with no major operational set back, safety and environmental incidents. After the well clean up, the well has been flow-tested up to 1500 Sm3/d (limited by rig capacity) and the well testing evaluation shows that the well delivers productivity as expected. Tracer samples analyses also show good production contribution from both reservoirs being penetrated by 1000 m of 8-½?? horizontal hole section.
The HPHT reservoir (819 bar / 162 oC) in Morvin wells requires a different approach to completion design and practices in order to avoid well control incidents, operational problems, and achieve full well integrity during its production lifecycle. It demands the use of non conventional materials and fluids, careful equipment selection which is seldom available off-the-shelf in today's market, equipment qualifications and new procedures1. This paper describes the original completion concept that was much influenced by well completion experiences from the Kristin field, the world's first HPHT field to be developed subsea from multi-well templates. The paper then discusses the improvements made from the original completion design, challenges and contingencies.
Today, oil and gas E&P activities have been steadily expanded into handling more complex and challenging projects such as high pressure high temperature (HPHT) wells. Among the regulatory bodies, the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD) defines HPHT wells as deeper than 4000 mTVD and/or having an expected shut-in wellhead pressure (SIWHP) exceeding 690 bar and/or having a bottom hole temperature exceeding 150 oC2. The main factors affecting the completion design and well integrity in HPHT wells are the extreme surface pressure, very high temperature, and various load scenarios during their lifecycle combined with the corrosivity level of the well environment. Risk of failures in this HPHT completion design is usually associated with2:
• High stress environment, both tension and compression.
• High operating temperatures.
• Chemical activity of well fluid components enhanced by the high temperature.
• Narrow margin between the boundaries of load uncertainties and equipment's material rating.
Longer planning process is sometimes required to anticipate long lead times of HPHT specific equipment. Longer time is also needed for the equipment qualification.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||19|