Please enable JavaScript for this site to function properly.
OnePetro
  • Help
  • About us
  • Contact us
Menu
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Log in / Register

Log in to your subscription

and
Advanced search Show search help
  • Full text
  • Author
  • Company/Institution
  • Publisher
  • Journal
  • Conference
Boolean operators
This OR that
This AND that
This NOT that
Must include "This" and "That"
This That
Must not include "That"
This -That
"This" is optional
This +That
Exact phrase "This That"
"This That"
Grouping
(this AND that) OR (that AND other)
Specifying fields
publisher:"Publisher Name"
author:(Smith OR Jones)

“Red” Vs. “Green” Scale Inhibitors For Extending Squeeze Life - A Case Study From North Sea, Norwegian Sector

Authors
Myles Jordan (Nalco Energy Services Ltd) | Eyvind Sorhaug (Talisman Energy Norge AS) | David Marlow (Nalco Energy Service AS) | Gordon Graham (Scaled Solutions Ltd)
Document ID
NACE-10137
Publisher
NACE International
Source
CORROSION 2010, 14-18 March, San Antonio, Texas
Publication Date
2010
Document Type
Conference Paper
Language
English
Copyright
2010. NACE International
Keywords
squeeze, polymer scale inhibitor, scale, environmental, phosphonate scale inhibitor
Downloads
0 in the last 30 days
158 since 2007
Show more detail
Price: USD 20.00
ABSTRACT

Over the years environmental legislation has forced changes in the types of scale inhibitor molecule that can be deployed in certain regions of the world. These regulations have results in changes from phosphonate scale inhibitor to polymer based chemistry particularly in the Norwegian and UK continental shelf where phosphonates have either been on the substitution list or phased out for many applications. Over the past 10 years significant improvements in inhibitor properties of the so called “Green” scale inhibitors have been made. For one particular operator the squeeze application of this “green” scale inhibitor resulted in poorer than expected treatment lifetimes and significant operating cost due to the frequency of retreatment. To overcome the increasing operating cost an evaluation was made of the current treatment chemicals vs. the older more established phosphonate scale inhibitors. The results for the laboratory evaluation suggested that the older chemistry would extend treatment life and reduce operating cost. A case was made to the legislative authority and field applications started. The squeeze lifetimes for the “red” phosphonate chemistry were shown to be better than the “yellow/green” inhibitors. This paper presents the laboratory evaluation of the scale inhibitors, outlines the rationale for the change back to phosphonate scale inhibitors and illustrates the improvement observed via field results from the 2 wells treated so far.

INTRODUCTION

The subject field is located in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea and came on stream in December 1998. The 8 production and 3 injection wells are tied into the wellhead platform and the oil processed at a Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessel (FPSO). The distance between the wellhead platform and the ship is 1 km. The water depth is 86 m. The oil is exported by tankers and the produced gas re-injected. Map of the field's location is shown in Figure 1. Water injection utilises seawater for reservoir support and is incompatible with the formation water. Over the years scale squeeze treatments have been applied to production wells to control sulphate scale. This is supplemented by application of scale inhibitor on the wellhead platform to prevent further deposition during transport of fluids to the FPSO and during its processing prior to discharge to sea.

Scale squeeze deployment is more challenging in this field than normal platform wells for the following reasons. The field is an unmanned wellhead platform and FPSO separated by approximately 1 km with flexible multiphase flowlines and umbilicals. This makes scale squeeze operations difficult due to the lack of space on the unmanned wellhead platform to locate chemical tanks and pumping equipment. To perform these operations, separate crews are deployed to both the wellhead platform and the FPSO which is only possible during periods of good weather due to helicopter landing issues on the FPSO and lack of accommodation and bedspace on the unmanned platform. Hardlines are taken from the water injection system through a manual choke to the wing valve on the target well.
File Size  694 KBNumber of Pages   16

Other Resources

Looking for more? 

Some of the OnePetro partner societies have developed subject- specific wikis that may help.


 


PetroWiki was initially created from the seven volume  Petroleum Engineering Handbook (PEH) published by the  Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).








The SEG Wiki is a useful collection of information for working geophysicists, educators, and students in the field of geophysics. The initial content has been derived from : Robert E. Sheriff's Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics, fourth edition.

  • Home
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Copyright © SPE All rights reserved
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Help
  • Terms of use
  • Publishers
  • Content Coverage
  • Privacy
  Administration log in