Machine Learning for Detecting Stuck Pipe Incidents: Data Analytics and Models Evaluation
- Abrar Alshaikh (Saudi Aramco) | Arturo Magana-Mora (Saudi Aramco) | Salem Al Gharbi (Saudi Aramco) | Abdullah Al-Yami (Saudi Aramco)
- Document ID
- International Petroleum Technology Conference
- International Petroleum Technology Conference, 26-28 March, Beijing, China
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- Conference Paper
- 2019. International Petroleum Technology Conference
- 1.12.6 Drilling Data Management and Standards, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 7.2 Risk Management and Decision-Making, 7.2.1 Risk, Uncertainty and Risk Assessment, 7 Management and Information, 7.6.6 Artificial Intelligence, 1.12 Drilling Measurement, Data Acquisition and Automation, 1.10 Drilling Equipment
- Prediction, Real-Time, Stuck Pipe, Detection, Machine Learning
- 17 in the last 30 days
- 231 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 7.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 23.00|
The earlier a stuck pipe incident is predicted and mitigated, the higher the chance of success in freeing the pipe or avoiding severe sticking in the first place. Time is crucial in such cases as an improper reaction to a stuck pipe incident can easily make it worse. In this work, practical machine learning, classification models were developed using real-time drilling data to automatically detect stuck pipe incidents during drilling operations and communicate the observations and alerts, sufficiently ahead of time, to the rig crew for avoidance or remediation actions to be taken.
The models use machine learning algorithms that feed on identified key drilling parameters to detect stuck pipe anomalies. The parameters used in building the system were selected based on published literature and historical data and reports of stuck pipe incidents and were analyzed and ranked to identify the ones of key influence on the accuracy of stuck pipe detection via a nonlinear relationship. The model exceptionally uses the robustness of data-based analysis along with the physics-based analysis.
The model has shown effective detection of the signs observed by experts ahead of time and has helped with providing enhanced stuck pipe detection and risk assessment. Validating and testing the model on several cases showed promising results as anomalies on simple and complex parameters were detected before or near the actual time stuck pipe incidents were reported from the rig crew. This facilitated better understanding of the underlying physics principles and provided awareness of stuck pipe occurrence.
The model improved monitoring and interpreting the drilling data streams. Beside such pipe signs, the model helped with detecting signs of other impeding problems in the downhole conditions of the wellbore, the drilling equipment, and the sensors. The model is designed to be implemented in the real-time drilling data portal to provide an alarm system for all oil and gas rigs based on the observed abnormalities. The alarm is to be populated on the real-time environment and communicated to the rig crew in a timely manner to ensure optimal results, giving them sufficient time ahead to prevent or remediate a potential stuck pipe incident.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||9|
Alshaikh, A. A., Albassam, M. K., Al Gharbi, S. H., and Al-Yami, A. S. 2018. Detection of Stuck Pipe Early Signs and the Way Toward Automation. Presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 12–15 November. SPE-192975-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/192975-MS
Alshaikh, A. A. and Amanullah, M. 2018. A Comprehensive Review of Differential Sticking, Spotting Fluids, and the Current Testing and Evaluation Methods. Presented at the SPR Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, 23–26 April. SPE-192169-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/192169-MS
Biegler, M. W. and Kuhn, G. R. 1994. Advances in Prediction of Stuck Pipe Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Dallas, Texas, 15–18 February. SPE-27529-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/27529-MS.
Chamkalani, A., Shahri, M. P., and Poordad, S. 2013. Support Vector Machine Model: A New Methodology for Stuck Pipe Prediction. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, Muscat, Oman, 28–30 January. SPE-164003-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/164003-MS.
Fernandez-Delgado M., Cernadas E., and Barro S. 2014. Do we Need Hundreds of Classifiers to Solve Real World Classification Problems? Journal of Machine Learning Research 15 (10): 3133–3781. http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/delgado14a.html
Ferreira, A. P. L. A., Carvalho, D. J. L., Rodrigues, R. M.. 2015. Automated Decision Support and Expert Collaboration Avoid Stuck Pipe and Improve Drilling Operations in Offshore Brazil Subsalt Well. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 4–7 May. OTC-25838. https://doi.org/10.4043/25838-MS.
Hempkins, W. B., Kingsborough, R. H., Lohec, W. E.. 1987. Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Stuck Drillpipe Situations. SPE Drilling Engineering 2 (03): 237–244. SPE-14181-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/14181-PA.
Howard, J. A. and Glover, S. B. 1994. Tracking Stuck Pipe Probability While Drilling. Presented at the APE/IADC Drilling Conference, Dallas, Texas, 15–18 February. SPE-27528-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/27528-MS.
Magana-Mora A. and Bajic V. B. 2017. OmniGA: Optimized Omnivariate Decision Trees for Generalizable Classication Models. Scientific Reports 7. 3898 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04281-9.
Miri, R., Sampaio, J. H. B., Afshar, M.. 2007. Development of Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Differential Pipe Sticking in Iranian Offshore Oil Fields. Presented at the International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, Veracruz, Mexico, 27 30 June. SPE-108500-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/108500-MS.
Muqeem, M. A., Weekse, A. E., and Al-Hajji, A. A. 2012. Stuck Pipe Best Practices - A Challenging Approach to Reducing Stuck Pipe Costs. Presented at the SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, 8–11 April. SPE-160845-MS. https://dx.doi.org/10.2118/160845-MS.
Murillo, A., Neuman, J., and Samuel, R. 2009. Pipe Sticking Prediction and Avoidance Using Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Modeling. Presented at the SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 4–8 April. SPE-120128-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/120128-MS.
Naraghi, M. E., Ezzatyar, P., and Jamshidi, S. 2013. Prediction of Drilling Pipe Sticking by Active Learning Method (ALM). Journal of Petroleum and Gas Engineering 4 (07): 173–183. EBB3D3041956. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPGE2013.0166.
Pedregosa F., Varoquaux G., Gramfort A., . 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 12 (11) 2825–2830. 1953048.2078195. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1953048.2078195.
Sadlier, A., Says, I., and Hanson, R. 2013. Automated Decision Support to Enhance While-Drilling Decision Making: Where Does It Fit Within Drilling Automation?. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 5–7 March. SPE-163430-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163430-MS.
Salminen, K., Cheatham, C., Smith, M., . 2017. Stuck-Pipe Prediction by Use of Automated Real-Time Modeling and Data Analysis. SPE Drilling & Completion 32 (03): 184–193. https://doi.org/10.2118/178888-PA.
Shoraka, S. A. R., Shadizadeh, S. R., and Shahri, M. P. 2011. Prediction of Stuck Pipe in Iranian South Oil Fields Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Presented at Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Abuja, Nigeria, 30 July–3 August. SPE-151076-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/151076-MS.
Siruvuri, C., Nagarakanti, S., and Samuel, R. 2006. Stuck Pipe Prediction and Avoidance: A Convolutional Neural Network Approach. Presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Miami, Florida, 21–23 February. SPE-98378-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/98378-MS.