| Authors |
C.A. Torres, SPE, Schlumberger; F. Treint and C. Alonso, Total; A. Milne, SPE,
Schlumberger; and A. Lecomte, Total
|
| Preview |
Abstract
Crude produced in the North of Monagas Estate, East Venezuela, has a high
asphaltene content, which comes out of solution in both the wellbore tubulars
and pipeline. This can eventually lead to complete plugging of the pipeline.
This increases the cost of maintaining production because of the need to
periodically remove these organic deposits. In a specific case, 9 km of
8-5/8-in. outside diameter (OD) production pipeline was successfully cleaned
out using 2-in. OD coiled-tubing (CT) to regain pipeline production. As there
is limited literature or documentation on the use of CT for this specific
application, the operator and the service company established a joint team to
do the feasibility study and engineering. Some of the key points were; the
design of a frame to lay down the injector head, define the entry points along
the pipeline, the selection of the bottomhole assembly (BHA), and fluids to
use. Other issues were the measurement of stresses (push/pull) on the CT so
that the CT could be run as far as possible in the pipeline without damaging
either the CT or the pipeline. The pipeline was successfully cleaned, the CT
being run seven times from five different entry points in the pipeline. This
resulted in savings of USD 1 million for the operator and significantly
reduced the time to recover normal production in the pipeline.
Background
The characteristic asphaltene content in the crude produced from the
northeastern Venezuelan oilfields,1 requires periodic CT cleanouts with
solvents and mechanical means to remove the obstructions that plug the wells
and reduce production. These asphaltenes precipitate from solution in the
wellbore tubular, caused by the pressure and temperature differentials, and
progressively reduce the flow area in the tubing. Surface facilities are not
exempt from this phenomenon. As the crude flows through the pipeline, the
asphaltenes settle at the bottom due to the lower temperatures and pressures
in the system. To prevent total plugging, the operators pump solvent mixtures
and pigs through the pipelines, however without regular treatments the
pipelines become restricted and eventually the production rate drops.
In the case studied, this phenomenon led to an increase in the differential
pressure in the line and ended in complete production stoppage on the surface
system. This forced the operator to look for alternative means to reestablish
and maintain production. Fig. 1 illustrates the progressive increase in the
pipeline’s differential pressure caused by the asphaltenes accumulation.
Conventional pipeline maintenance practices could not be performed. Pumping
aromatic solvents was not an option given the environmental constraints.
Temporary Production Assisted by a Mobile Testing Unit
To maintain the well’s production, a program designed to produce the well
using a mobile testing unit (MTU) was implemented. A choke manifold, a flare,
two separators, and twelve 500-bbl capacity storage tanks were connected to
the well and reconnected to the production line. Because of the severity of
the pipeline plugging, it was necessary to transport the produced oil using
trucks, increasing the risk associated with human error and environmental
incidents. Fig. 2 illustrates the MTU layout.
An attempt was performed to unplug an entire pipeline section, with the
assumption that the plugged section would be below the river crossed by the
pipeline, as this was the coldest and the lowest point in the pipeline. Two
pipeline entry points (HT1 and HT2) were constructed to perform a first test
across the river section by pumping water at a maximum pressure of 2,900 psi.
Different pipeline sections were tested following the same procedure. When the
pressure built up and there was no resultant flow at the other end, a plugged
section was identified. Two main plugged sections were identified. The results
showed that these plugged sections were located between the pipeline entry
points HT3 and HT2 and between HT1 and HT4. Fig. 3 illustrates the
pipeline layout on the field and the pipeline entry point locations.
|