| Authors |
Yousef Ghomian, SPE, Gary A. Pope, SPE, and Kamy Sepehrnoori, SPE, The
University of Texas at Austin
|
| Source |
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,
21-24 September 2008,
Denver, Colorado, USA
|
| Preview |
Abstract
Correlations are commonly used to predict CO2 multiple contact miscibility
(MMP) since such correlations are generally inexpensive and easy to use. In
this study, we used a novel approach based upon four dimensionless scaling
groups commonly used for hydrocarbon phase behavior modeling (reduced
temperature and acentric factors for light and heavy pseudo components) as well
as multivariate regression analysis based on response surface methodology to
develop an MMP correlation for a broad range of reservoir oils. Applying the
response surface method and multivariate regression analysis made it possible
to quantify and rank the effect of each one of the mentioned dimensionless
groups on the predicted MMP value. Since reservoir temperature is one of the
main parameters, slim tube simulations were performed at four different
reservoir temperatures (90, 150, 180, and 220 °F) for all of the fluid models.
Based on the results from these simulations, and by performing multi-variate
regression analysis, MMP values were correlated using a response surface based
on linear, quadratic, and third degree equations. Our new MMP correlation takes
into account the important equation-of-state properties for heavy- and
light-oil components as well as temperature. Predicted MMP values from the new
correlation were compared with previously published MMP correlations and found
to have a lower average error.
Introduction
Miscible CO2 flooding is one of the most efficient displacement processes among
tertiary oil recovery methods. Based on a study by Stosur et al. (1990), on
future potential of Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods in the US, miscible CO2
gas injection is gaining more popularity and eventually will be more attractive
than any other EOR techniques. This can be related to higher oil prices as well
as availability of more CO2 sources considering the global regulations and
restrictions on CO2 emissions. In a CO2 displacement project, when full
miscibility between injected CO2 and reservoir fluid is reached, capillary
forces are eliminated from displacement process which ideally results in no oil
trapping and consequently higher recovery values. Difference between reservoir
pressure (or displacement pressure) and Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) is
the most important factor to determine whether miscibility has been achieved in
the reservoir. Displacement pressure should be higher than MMP in order to
achieve miscibility in the reservoir.
Miscibility in reservoir conditions is generally achieved by two different
mechanisms. When the injected fluid and reservoir crude become fully miscible,
or in other words, First Contact Miscible (FCM) conditions are achieved, a
single phase fluid is created and therefore, injected fluid completely
displaces the reservoir fluid. One of the most obvious cases for this type of
miscibility condition is FCM of Butane with some crude oils at reservoir
conditions. Another type of miscibility mechanism is called multiple contact
miscible displacement. Carbon dioxide generally makes multiple contact
miscibility with crude oils at some reservoir conditions. This means that many
contacts are necessary (in the form of mass transfer) for crude oil components
and CO2 to be mixed with each other. In these contacts, CO2 first starts to be
condensed into the
reservoir oil, and then light oil components are vaporized into the CO2-rich
phases. This continues until there is no interfacial tension between these two
new phases and a single hydrocarbon phase is being produced. This process
mainly depends on reservoir pressure since reservoir temperature is considered
constant in the CO2 flooding processes. As reservoir pressure increases, more
CO2 is dissolved in the oil and more oil components are vaporized by oil. It is
known that the extraction of hydrocarbons depends greatly on the density of CO2
(Lake, 1989). As CO2 density increases, more hydrocarbon components are
vaporized from crude. In general, higher reservoir pressure results in higher
CO2 density. The pressure at which reservoir oil and CO2 are in extremely close
contact is called MMP.
|