| Preview |
Abstract
The technical integrity of a plant means that, under specific operational
conditions, the risk of failure is as low as reasonably possible, or A.L.A.R.P.
This definition does not precisely tell us what is technical integrity, nor how
it can be achieved and maintained. The obvious questions are: How can
technical integrity be achieved and maintained, and at what cost? This
presentation offers some answers to these questions through a review of the
strategy and the management systems developed and implemented in Shell to
achieve, maintain, and demonstrate the technical integrity of our plants.
Integrity and reliability are neither activities nor names of departments in an
organizational chart, but rather continuous processes that involve various
management and technical levels in the company. A robust quality system
is needed to ensure that the optimum strategies are developed and
executed. Examples of the application of these processes and their
supporting systems demonstrate that the integrity and reliability of oil and
gas production, transportation, and refining plants is a critical factor to
ensure their profitability. The elements that form the basis of these
systems, and their integration into the plant management, are analyzed. These
topics should be of interest to people interested in improving both the safety
and the performance of their plants.
Introduction
This presentation focuses on the technical and mechanical integrity, and the
reliability, of hydrocarbon processing plants, although the elements and
conclusions that will be presented are equally valid for other industrial
plants and for oil and gas production and transportation facilities.
Mechanical integrity is just one of the components of process safety
management, albeit one of its most critical. Clearly, the safety of a process
cannot be higher than that of the equipment that contains it. Mechanical
integrity is also a key element, but not the only one, to improve the
performance, reliability, and profitability of plants, since plants that cannot
operate due to failures or product leaks will not generate profits. Many
studies have shown that loss of mechanical integrity, which results in leaks,
environmental contamination, health and safety incidents, or even catastrophic
failures, is the main cause of economic underperformance and loss of human life
in the oil and gas industry1.
The A.L.A.R.P. concept ("as low as reasonably possible") was
developed to evaluate the inherent risk of an activity. It means that the
possible modes of equipment failure, such as corrosion, fracture, fatigue,
embrittlement, erosion, etc., have been evaluated, and the mechanisms and
procedures to reduce or mitigate the impact of these failures have been
implemented. The risks include economic, environmental, health and safety
aspects. Technical and mechanical integrity programmes typically focus on
establishing and maintaining risks at an ALARP level.
The information that will be presented can be used to improve the
effectiveness of mechanical integrity programmes. The intent is to describe a
programme to achieve excellence in asset integrity management (AIM), and not
simply to comply with regulations and other government requirements. In
our experience, plants that only focus on meeting these regulations and not in
achieving excellence in AIM will not achieve the benefits, in terms of economic
performance, personal safety and environmental sustainability, that can be
obtained from achieving excellence in AIM.
Excellence in AIM does not translate to “expensive”. In fact, it can be
demonstrated that maintaining asset integrity pays for itself in reducing the
number of leaks with a consequent reduction in loss or deferred production,
increase in the on-stream availability of the assets, increase in the safety
and environmental performance, optimization in the utilization of limited
resources, etc.
Maintaining the mechanical integrity of a hydrocarbon processing plant is no
secret. It means, simply, to excecute the actions required, and to do so
consistently, effectively, and continuously, regardless of other priorities
that could interfere with their execution, such as achieving or cost reduction
targets. It is crucial to maintain the focus on mechanical integrity and not
allow distractions by other priorities.
|