| Source |
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,
30 October-2 November 2011,
Denver, Colorado, USA
|
| Preview |
Abstract
This paper addresses insights obtained from dynamic simulation of detailed
models of low permeability fluvial sandstones in the Williams Fork Formation,
Piceance Basin, Colorado. The detailed static models and an overview of the
dynamic modeling aspects were decribed previously (Pranter et. al., in press).
The static models represent the complex stratigraphic architecture and
connectivity of these fluvial sandstones as developed through outcrop analysis
while the flow simulation provide a means to understand the dynamic
connectivity. The Williams Fork Formation consists of fluvial channel
sandstones, crevasse splays, floodplain mudstones, and coals that were
deposited by meandering- and braided-river systems. Static connectivity
analyses of 3-D outcrop-based architectural-element models have shown how
relatively wide sandstone bodies enhance connectivity. The dynamic simulations
illustrated in this paper shows that historical performance can be mimicked by
considering only point bars, channel bars and marine sandstones
(reservoir-quality sandstones) as pay. The reservoir simulations used an
integrated approach to create 3D dynamic simulation models by combining
detailed static geological, geophysical and petrophysical characterizations. We
incorporated and calibrated hydraulic fracture properties at each well to
approximate initial productivity, used the characterization process to match
hyperbolic decline behavior and then investigated the volume influence of wells
and the impact of geologic characterization on performance by predicting
long-term gas recovery. These realistic and detailed reservoir models can honor
the historical gas rate without applying the assumption of open natural
fractures. This work demonstrates that an integrated approach can lead to
realistic 3D geologic and dynamic models which are consistent with static data
and historical performance. Such models are useful for estimating the impact of
complex sandstone connectivity on early and long-time performance including
well interference and optimal spacing. The paper also briefly discusses how
seismic constraints can lead to more unique descriptions with regard to
distributions of multi-story sandstone channels. Such methods combined with
detailed geologic models as described here could be used for designing more
optimal well locations and optimal spacing in less developed areas in tight gas
reservoirs.
Introduction
Mamm Creek Field is located in the Piceance Basin, northwestern Colorado, in
the United States. Most of the natural gas production in Mamm Creek Field comes
from fluvial tight sandstone (~5000 ft deep) in the Williams Fork formation;
however, marine sandstone in the Corcoran, Cozzette and Rollins members (~7000
ft deep) of the Iles Formation and the middle and upper sandstones of the
Williams Fork Formation also contribute to production (Scheevel and Cumella,
2009). The Williams Fork Formation is well known as a low porosity and low
permeability tight-sandstone within a basin center gas accumulation system.
Deposition of these Williams Fork Formations include fluvial channel
sandstones, crevasse splays, floodplain mudstones, and paludal coals that were
deposited by meandering- and braided-river systems within coastal- and alluvial
plain settings (Pranter et. al., in press). This complex fluvial depositional
environment results in highly heterogeneous reservoir connectivity. From a
production point of view, it is essential to understand the details of
properties and trends within the system.
To better understand the gas production from basin centered tight sandstone
systems, static sandstone-body connectivity is not the only issue with regard
to effective well drainage. The near-well connectivity improvement by modern
hydraulic fracturing must also be considered. Long-term drainage is affected by
the sandstone-to-sandstone contact area and permeability. This long-term
effective drainage is best evaluated through dynamic modelling.
|