| Source |
Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference,
19-21 October 2010,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
| Preview |
Abstract
Geological storage of CO2 requires that policy makers, regulatory agencies, and
industry ensure that these operations are safe for the public and that
sequestered CO2 is permanently removed from the atmosphere. One possible risk
identified with storing CO2 into the subsurface is the potential for leakage
through existing wells penetrating the cap rock. This study evaluated the well
integrity for existing wells in the Wabamun Area as part of a University of
Calgary lead study which examined the feasibility of storing 20 Mt-CO2/year for
50 years within 60 km of Wabamun (WASP- Wabamun area CO2 Sequestration
Project). A number of large stationary CO2 emitters are located in central
Alberta with cumulative annual emissions in the order of 30 Mt CO2. A discrete
approach was taken where each individual well was investigated and the need for
any additional workovers were on the basis of a decision matrix developed based
on current knowledge of well integrity for CO2 injection schemes. When
analyzing the existing well population only 4 out of 27 wells were identified
as work over candidates. This result demonstrates that well leakage from
existing wells is less of a mitigation problem than was first anticipated for
this area. For the existing wells only a few had production casing installed
through the Nisku formation, which is a situation more prone towards leakage.
The other wells had cement plugs through the cap rock with a cement type that
will prevent leakage through the Calmar shale. For existing wells that do
require work overs, it is recommended they be performed prior to pressurizing
the reservoir area. The cost and complexity of properly abandoning these wells
will be higher at higher pressures or when CO2 and possibly H2S are
present.
Introduction
To successfully inject CO2 into the subsurface to mitigate green house gases
CO2 has to be trapped in the subsurface and not leak to surface or to potable
water sources above the injection horizon. Potential leakage can occur through
several different mechanisms such as natural occurrences or along wells. To
avoid leakage from injection wells the integrity of the well has to be
maintained both during the injection period and after, as long as free (mobile
or movable) CO2 exists in the injection horizon. In addition to injection
wells, monitoring wells will most likely be required to monitor the plume
movement and possible leakage. For instance the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) in the United States has stated that their goal is to be able to account
for 99% of the injected CO2 (NETL, 2009).
In addition to the new injection and monitoring wells saline aquifers, seen as
attractive storage sites for CO2, are often located in areas with concurrent or
past oil production and there is a large number of existing wells. In the
province of Alberta there are already more than 350,000 wells and and annual
drilling rate of approximately 15,000 wells (ERCB, 2009). The integrity of
existing wells penetrating the capping formation to avoid leakage also needs to
be addressed.
|