| Authors |
P. Macini, SPE, and E. Mesini, SPE, U. of Bologna, Italy; F. Moia and R.
Guandalini, Erse, Italy; and D. Savoca, SPE, Environmental Quality Dept,
Regione Lombardia, Italy
|
| Preview |
Abstract
The paper is aimed to the assessment of the CO2 underground
storage potential of Lombardia Region (Italy), one of the most populated and
industrialized area of the Country. The study is intended to locate adequate
sites for the potential application of carbon capture and geologic storage in
deep underground formations.
The first part of the study concerns the evaluation and analysis of the mass
of CO2 generated in Lombardia Region (the largest CO2
producer in Italy, with over 70 million metric tonnes per year of
CO2 released in the atmosphere) by investigating both the localized
sources (industry, power generation, etc.) and the diffused ones (transport,
domestic heating, etc.). The second part of the study concerns the technical
evaluation of the possibility to put into practice the geologic storage of
CO2 in deep underground formations of Lombardia Region. Finally, the
study reports some preliminary evaluation for the possible implementation of a
CO2 storage pilot plant in the area. In particular, a potential
candidate located in a deep saline aquifer has been identified, and its
geological and hydrodynamic modelling has been extensively studied and
analyzed. The investigated reservoir has a storage capacity of more than 370
million metric tonnes of CO2, corresponding to about 30 years of
CO2 emissions produced by the main thermoelectric power plants
located in the same area.
Introduction
CO2 Capture and Storage (CCS) is a 3-step process including a)
CO2 capture from power plants, industrial sources, and natural gas
wells with high CO2 content; b) transportation (usually via
pipelines) to the storage site; c) geological storage in deep saline aquifers,
depleted oil or gas fields, unmineable coal seams, and enhanced oil or gas
recovery (EOR or EGR) sites. It must be remembered that CO2 can be
utilized as well to produce fertilizers and other chemicals, for enhanced plant
growth and as algae growth promoter, an interesting technique to capture
CO2 and transforming it into liquid fuel (as biodiesel) via
biological and chemical processes. In combustion processes, CO2 can
be captured either in pre-combustion mode (by fossil fuel treatment) or in
post-combustion mode (from flue gas or by oxyfuel).
Today, CO2 concentration in the atmosphere has drastically
increased from 280 ppm during the pre-industrial age to its current level of
380 ppm. It is proven that this is mainly due to the dramatic increase in the
fossil fuel combustion. This has caused climate changes concerns among
environmentalists and it is gaining more publicity as international agencies
and governmental sectors in different countries are seriously considering
CO2 reduction policies. It should be mentioned that there is no
direct proven evidence showing the relation between climate change and the
CO2 emissions. However, due to the greenhouse effect of
CO2 it is mainly suspected that a higher CO2
concentration in the atmosphere has caused these climate changes. Fossil fuel
power plants are responsible for one third of the total CO2
emissions. Reducing CO2 atmospheric concentrations by capturing
emissions at the source and then storing them in subsurface reservoirs is
thought by many scientists to be a reliable solution until emission-free energy
sources are developed and viable.
As recalled above, the main options for geological CO2 storage
are saline formations, depleted or partially depleted oil and gas reservoirs,
and deep unmineable coal seams. Here, CO2 can be stored using a
variety of different mechanisms (CO2 as single phase in pore space,
dissolved in water, absorbed on surfaces, trapped by relative permeability and
fixed in minerals), with several options for underground storage. As reported
in the “Stategic Deployment Document” of the European Technology Platform for
Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants (ZEP,
http://www.zero-emissionplatform.eu/website
/docs/ETP%20ZEP/ZEP%20SDD%20-%20draft%2012.pdf, the relative order of magnitude
potential of the various storage methods may be basically described as follows:
1000, deep saline aquifer storage (porous rocks); 100, oil and gas field use
and storage; 10 deep unmineable coal bed use and storage; 1, mineral
sequestration.
|