| Authors |
P.R. Neal,1,2 M. Ho,1,2 G. Fimbres-Weihs,1,2 F. Hussain,2 and Y.
Cinar1,2
1. Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC),
Canberra, Australia
2. School of Petroleum Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney,
Australia
|
| Preview |
Abstract
All engineering freshman at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) are
required to complete the course “Engineering Design and Innovation”. The
course, commenced in 2006, provides students with learning opportunities in
design, communication and teamwork. Each year, over 1,000 students combine
lectures in design theory and communications skills with a hands-on design
project. Ten of the schools in the Faculty of Engineering offer design projects
as part of the course. The first project offered by the School of Petroleum
Engineering was involved designing a “mini sucker rod pump”. In recent years
the School offers a project on CO2 sequestration – which has broader appeal and
relevance to students across the faculty. Despite students’ enthusiasm to win
the design contest, the aim of the course is to build skills rather than a
device.
In this paper, we highlight the innovative approaches to demonstrating CO2
injection taken by UNSW first year students. We also evaluate the teaching and
learning outcomes from this project. All teams worked together to design and
build their device and to document their experience. However, some teams
collaborated more effectively than others. We quantified this effectiveness
using an online peer assessment tool that enables students to rate the
performance of their team mates. We incorporated these ratings into the
assignment of individual marks for group assignments.
We analyse the marks students achieved for various assessments and components
of the course. We find that female students tended to out-perform their peers
in both individual and team assessments. We also find that students who did
well in individual components of the course also did well in the team
components. We find it is hard to use early assessments to predict performance
in later assessments. There is a strong connection between students’ results
for their Design Proposal and their results for the Final Design work. We are
able to show a statistically significant improvement for marks for
presentations but not for report writing. We also found that there is an
improving trend in marks over the semester. Having surveyed students, we find
that 90% of students were satisfied with their experience of the course.
Students found this course to be challenging and fun, giving them a good start
in developing their skills as engineers.
Course Design
Our aim in teaching “Engineering Design and Innovation” is that students might
be introduced to the principles of, skills used and methods applied in the
practice of engineering design. In addition to this, we aim to for the students
develop skills and experience in professional communication and
team-work.
The teaching strategy we take is for learning to occur in the context of the
design project. Lectures are designed to either instruct students in the
technical knowledge or introduce the skills required for the successful
completion of the project. We expect students to then apply this knowledge in
the project. They develop communication skills by having to talk and write
about their project. By being part of a project team, they learn team-work
skills. By having to build a device within a timeframe and under constraints,
they gain experience in design, project management, time management and
construction. They learn to think-ahead about problems that might arise,
develop contingency plans and trouble-shoot – all important skills in the
practice of engineering.
|