| Authors |
Mark L. Butler, SPE, John B. Trueblood, Trueblood Resources Inc.; Gary A.
Pope, SPE, Mukul M. Sharma, SPE, The University of Texas at Austin; and Jimmie
R. Baran Jr. and Doug Johnson, SPE, 3M Company
|
| Preview |
Abstract
The loss of productivity due to liquid blockage in gas wells is a common
problem. Dropout of condensate from gas and/or water accumulates in the pores
of the rock near a producing well or within a hydraulic fracture, causing a
significant reduction in gas relative permeability, curtailing production. As a
solution to this problem, we have developed a chemical treatment designed to
increase flow rates of blocked gas wells. The treatment alters the wettability
of the solid surface, minimizing capillary pressure and increasing the relative
permeabilities of gas and condensate. In laboratory core flood experiments,
application of this chemical treatment increased flow rates by a factor of
about 2 for two-phase flow of gas and condensate, gas and water, and gas and
volatile oil. To bring this technology from the laboratory into the field, we
stimulated
a blocked gas well. The initial results of this field trial are reported in
this paper and demonstrate the treatment was highly effective.
Introduction
Over time, many gas wells reach a point where flow rates are reduced due to the
accumulation of oil, condensate and/or water blockage and may eventually become
uneconomic. In gas condensate reservoirs, liquid begins forming as the pressure
drops below the saturation or dewpoint pressure of the gas (Afidick et al.,
1994; Ayyalasomayajula et al., 2005). Since the largest pressure drop occurs
near the producing well, the formation of this condensate phase usually starts
near the wellbore. The
condensed liquid becomes trapped by capillary forces and is retained in the
rock as a result of low liquid mobility. Production avenues in the formation
are subsequently blocked, reducing relative permeability to gas and causing
production to decline. This loss of productivity due to liquid blockage is an
especially serious problem for rich condensate gases. Depending on the
reservoir’s fluid composition, pressure and temperature, the liquid dropout
from the gas phase may be as high as 30-40%.
Even for dry gas wells, a 1% liquid dropout reduces production significantly
which has been reported to decline by a factor of 2 to 4 as a result of
condensate accumulation (Afidick et al., 1994).
Hydraulic fracturing is commonly used to increase well productivity but has
limitations. One such limitation is significant condensate saturation will
simply buildup in the fracture reducing conductivity (Mohan, 2005). In fields
where there is significant liquid blockage in the formation, fracturing is not
always effective. Other conventional methods such as gas, microemulsion,
surfactant or solvent injection may also prove only marginally effective. There
is a need for an inexpensive, durable and alternative solution to this common
problem.
A new approach under development is the use of an innovative chemical treatment
solution to alleviate liquid blockage (Kumar, 2006; Kumar et al., 2006; Bang,
2007; Bang et al., 2008; Bang et al., 2009). The treatment solution consists of
an active chemical in a solvent that is brine tolerant. The active chemical is
a non-ionic polymeric fluorinated surfactant that is non-reactive, but
interacts with the substrate under reservoir conditions to alter the
wettability of the surface. This change in wettability increases the relative
permeabilities of gas and condensate (Bang et al., 2006). The selection of an
appropriate solvent mixture to deliver the chemical is an important part of the
chemical treatment. A mixture of 2-butoxyethanol and ethanol was used as the
solvent in this application. More details about the chemistry of the
fluorochemical, alternative solvents and the method of selecting solvents can
be found in Bang (2007) and Bang et al., (2008).
In extensive laboratory experiments (at field pressures, temperatures and flow
rates) application of the experimental treatment increased gas and condensate
flow rates in core samples by about 1.5 to 3.0 times over an extended time,
without plugging or other undesirable effects (Bang, 2007). These treatments
have been shown to be durable for thousands of pore volumes of subsequent flow
of the gas-condensate/oil fluid.
|