| Paper Number | 105395-MS | ||||
| DOI What's this? | 10.2118/105395-MS | ||||
| Title |
Casing-Drilling Step Improvement: PDC Successfully Drills Out Casing Bit and Finishes Hole Section at Lowest Cost |
||||
| Authors |
Ian Johnstone, Alistair Chomley, Gheorghe Cernev, Mahbub Hoq, Geoff Atherton, Santos Simon Cornel, and Martin Jacobs, Hughes Christensen |
||||
| Source |
SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, 20-22 February 2007, Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
||||
| Copyright |
2007. SPE/IADC Drilling Conference |
||||
| Language | |||||
| Preview |
Abstract At the outset of the project, the operator’s main goal was to improve
drilling efficiencies with the aim of drilling more wells per rig per year. The
secondary objective was to reduce costs and make the wells more economically
feasible. To address these challenges, the service company recommended a
specialized casing bit manufactured from a specialized steel alloy that allows
technicians to braze PDC cutters directly to the one-piece bit ensuring a
robust cutting structure capable of efficiently drilling new formation as well
as reaming existing hole while drilling casing in place. They also recommended
a new-style drill out PDC to drill through the casing bit and The new 6-3/4” drill out PDC bit (XDO) was run with outstanding results. It demonstrated the ability to drill through the casing drilling shoe and drilled ahead 6,000ft to TD in one run. The XDO held inclination at high WOB and did not ball up. The successful trail proves the feasibility of this technology in a full scale casing drilling application, moving the application one step closer to reality. The bit company plans to redesign the XDO to improve performance in the drill out and through the softer formations out of the shoe. The authors will make cost comparisons with offset wells drilled with conventional drilling systems. They will also focus on lessons learned through using this new technology.
Introduction Looking forward, the target was to drill approx 200 oil and 50 gas wells annually. These would be infill drilling in existing fields. Evaluation would be kept to a minimum. For their future campaigns, the operator had identified several areas for performance improvements:
To achieve these results, the operator required a step change in performance. They believed this was possible by moving towards fully automated drilling rigs. This opened the door for the evaluation of associated technologies such as Casing Drilling.1-8 It was deemed critical for the success of the shallow oil wells to reduce the flat time as this constituted a significant portion of the overall time spent on each well (Figure 2)
Objectives
The operator and service company’s engineering teams, working together as technology partners, broke the task into two clearly defined sections a) 9-7/8” casing drilling of the surface hole and b) 6-3/4” production hole drilling with 4-1/2” liner.
|
||||
| File Size | 1,165 KB | ||||
| Price |
Change Currency |
||||
| Download History: | |||||
| 285 times downloaded since 2007. |