| Source |
Offshore Technology Conference,
30 April-3 May 2012,
Houston, Texas, USA
|
| Preview |
Abstract
As part of potential work in a CO2 sequestration project, several flow
assurance related issues were evaluated. Of particular importance were issues
that impacted design decisions and operability for wells, pipeline, and
facilities. In this work, the major design impacts were compressor discharge
pressure, dehydration requirements of the injected CO2, hydrate mitigation at
the wellhead, and placement of safety valves in the wells. In addition to these
main design decisions, flow assurance also played a role in developing key
operating strategies. These included: 1) pipeline blowdown impacting material
integrity, 2) hydraulics analysis for required number of wells, 3) thermal
performance of the system for both materials issues and hydrate management, 4)
fluid hammer impacts due to rapid valve closure. Finally, to complete this
effort, various tools were employed which had to be assessed for their
applicability and accuracy in both the steady state and transient system
performance.
Introduction
As a part of a potential carbon sequestration project, CO2 is captured from a
crude upgrading process and subsequently dehydrated, compressed, and
transported via pipeline (50 miles) before finally being injected into an
underground saline aquifer. The goal is to capture, transport, and sequester
several billion pounds of CO2 per year.
This work looks at many of the flow assurance issues that impact system design
and the safe operation of the project. By evaluating these issues early in the
project development phase, relatively simple design changes can be made that
significantly reduce the operating complexity of the project. In this work, the
flow assurance risks consisted of hydrate and ice formation, material integrity
issues due to low operating temperatures, and potential issues regarding the
multiphase flow operation of the pipeline and injection wells.
Modeling Background
In order to accurately design and operate the system, a sound understanding of
the various thermodynamic and flow modeling software was required. Although the
phase behavior of pure CO2 is well understood, it is relatively more difficult
to model once impurities are introduced. These impurities can influence the
phase behavior as well as the solubility of water in the CO2-rich fluid. The
phase behavior is important in the assessment of the potential operating region
where multiphase conditions may exist. The solubility of water into the
CO2-rich fluid largely dictates the ice and hydrate stability region. In
addition to the phase behavior aspects of the fluid, the physical properties of
these different phases need to be accurately captured in a flow simulator to
adequately model transient phenomena.
Given these modeling complexities, it was critical to understand how well each
of the software packages predicted these various items and the intended range
of applicability of the software. In cases where it was not possible to model
the system precisely, it was necessary to understand what the critical input
and output parameters were from the model so that a reasonable proxy could be
used instead.
|