| Authors |
T.C. Grant, D. Morgan, US DOE/National Energy Technology Laboratory; M.
Godec, R. Lawrence, Advanced Resources International; J. Valenstein, R. Murray,
Booz Allen Hamilton
|
| Source |
Carbon Management Technology Conference,
7-9 February 2012,
Orlando, Florida, USA
|
| Preview |
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL)
has developed a model to estimate the costs of sequestering captured CO2. This
model includes costs from initial regional geologic evaluation through site
characterization, permitting, injection/MVA operations, postinjection
site care to final site closure and transfer to long-term stewardship.
Differences in storage costs across different geologic formations are driven by
two basic factors: injectivity which determines the number of injection wells
drilled to accommodate a given rate of CO2 injection and the volume of CO2 to
be sequestered which determines, per in-situ reservoir parameters, the areal
extent of the plume and hence the Area of Review of a Class VI well permit. The
AoR defines the areal extent of MVA activities which dominates costs during
injection and post-injection operations. The basic framework for this model
provides costs for compliance with various sections of EPA’s Class VI
regulation and Subpart RR of the GHG Reporting Program. Cost analysis at two
levels is provided by this model: site
specific where the modeler can enter their own reservoir and cost data and
regional in the form of cost supply curves. A geologic and cost database was
developed to support this model. Published analyses of storage cost to date
have been very general, providing estimates for site characterization or
overall
costs but few details. While storage costs are a small percentage of overall
CCS costs, they represent a significant investment. Getting to the point of
injection operations will take tens of millions of dollars.
Model results indicate that operation/post-closure MVA costs will represent
some 70 percent of overall storage costs. Also, the financial mechanisms used
to establishing Financial Responsibility prior to permitting may represent a
significant cost. A detailed understanding of overall storage costs is critical
for investors and policy planners. This model can be combined with a simple
pipeline costing model that is part of NETL’s current Transport, Storage, and
Monitoring Cost Model as well as with NETL’s Capture-Transport-Storage pipeline
model capable of modeling CO2 pipeline networks. This model can be combined
with NETL’s Power Supply Financial Model for cost analysis across the CCS value
chain.
Introduction
The National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) has developed a CO2
Transportation & Storage cost model. This model represents further
development of NETL’s existing model, Estimating Carbon Dioxide Transportation
and Storage Costs.i Recently, NETL developed a Capture-Transport-Storage (CTS)
model to model pipeline development for transportation of captured CO2 from
source to sink. NETL also has a Power Supply Financial Model (PSFM)ii to model
the cost of capture for an IGCC or Super-critical PC plant.
|